Finally the wait is over...received the card...usning 61.71 drvs i think beta...
will have some fun later...
![]()
I think 30k+ is in the works
keep us posted
I just hope it's not overclock locked like rumors are saying. Other then that, let's see that 30+ score brwmogazos!!!
Home PC: Intel i7 3770K @ 4.8ghz, 1.375v l Asus Maximus V Formula l Corsair Dominator Plantinum 2400mhz (4x4GB) l Asus GTX 690 l Samsung 840 Pro 256gb l 2 x WD Black 1T storage drive l WD MyBook 500gb External l Samsung SH-S203N DVD l Creative X-Fi Titanium HD l Corsair AX1200 PSU l Planar SA2311W23 3D LCD Monitor l Corsair 800D Case l Windows 7 Pro 64 bit l Sennheiser HD-590
Water Cooling Setup: Swiftech 320 Radiator(3 X Gentle Typhoons 1450rpm) l Swiftech Pump w/XSPC Res Top l Heatkiller 3.0 CPU Block l Heatkiller GPU-X GTX 690 "Hole Edition" Nickel l Heatkiller Geforce GTX 690 GPU Backplate l Danger Den 1/2ID UV Green tubing l EK EKoolant UV Green Liquid
-Impossible is not a word
Keep us informed, i'd like to know how it does.Originally posted by brwmogazos
i was having a bit of fun with the card..no benching tbh but...gaming lol
430 and 1.14ghz ram was a no go it rebooted even though coolbits wouldnt go higher hehe...
time to start the benching i think...i aint no 3dmark experienced member though..so dont expect great scores...
![]()
Good luck.
Asus Crosshair V Formula-Z | FX 8350 | 2x4GB Trident-X 2600 C10 | 2x ATI HD5870 Crossfire | Enermax Revo 1050watt | OCZ Vertex 3 60GB | Samsung F1 1TB
Watercooling: XSPC Raystorm | EK 5870 Delrin fullcover | TFC X-changer 480 w/ 4x Gentle Typhoon | DDC2+ Delrin top | EK 200mm res | Primochill LRT 3/8 tubing
Case: Murdermodded TJ-07
sub 9 sec. SPi1M 940BE 955BE 965BE 1090T
i dont think the nvidia cards are going to do well in 3dmark01se. Been a few around lately and less than stellar, 3dmark03 is another story tho.
I5 2500k@4.7ghz--Asus P8Z68-VGen3--4x4gb Gskill Ripsaw 1600 --EVGA GTX570--Crucial m4 128gb SSD--Corsair TX950w--Corsair H100--Corsair 800D
Scores are all 4+years old. updates soon.
All scores are outdated
24/7 3dmark06 6841
24/7 3dmark05 13357
24/7 3dmark03 22979
Very Mild 3dmark01se 55225
24/7 Aquamark 3 136020
just a quick question BRW: how did ya get those fan's on your memory to stay?
msi k8n neo2 plat
3200+ winchester (10x262)
bfg 6800gt
pdp pc3200 xbl
thermalright xp-90 w/7v tornado 92mm
Try aquamark if you really want to be blown-away.Originally posted by brwmogazos
lol
ram at 5/4 2.5 2 2 5
cpu @ 4.4ghz
card at 420-1.1ghz
score arround 24.5K...
even with my X800PRO i got 26k lolIt seems to love the 6800's.
2.6C@3.25 | P4P800-D
X800 PRO 525/560
2x256 Kingston Value CL3
11,360 03Marks
that card is a beast, i want it![]()
Those GT's look nice and slim compared to the ultra's . Let her rip on 03 should post a nice score, you need to get 12.6k to get on the front page.
Regards
Andy
they must of sent you my card on accident, i'll pm you my address![]()
![]()
![]()
Asus G60VX : Intel T9600@3.299GHZ : Nvidia GTX260M @ STOCK/ .9v
Front page of what? I count 13.9k to be on the front page.Originally posted by zakelwe
Those GT's look nice and slim compared to the ultra's . Let her rip on 03 should post a nice score, you need to get 12.6k to get on the front page.
Regards
Andy
Of course the GT won't beat an X800 Pro (on 2k1, though it should do well on 2k3). Look at the price difference?
I wish I could have kept my 6800 Ultra but that $1400.00 will come in handy!![]()
Originally posted by StormPC
Front page of what? I count 13.9k to be on the front page.
Of course the GT won't beat an X800 Pro (on 2k1, though it should do well on 2k3). Look at the price difference?
I wish I could have kept my 6800 Ultra but that $1400.00 will come in handy!![]()
Sorry, I meant first page of the GT class.
Regards
Andy
Ok i need to hide...
first of all i just formatted my hard drive and i installed again the antivirus etc etc...so my hdd is clean but i still got some proggys running...thats no excuse though...prob is that my ram is not with me any more....the 3700Eb so i am using some twinmoss sticks borrowed from a friend...512mb...at slacket timings obviously....
here are the 3dmark 01 benches...The fsb is low...and the timings affect a lot my scores as well as the low mem speed due to 5/4anyways heres some test results...for 013dmark
24474 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7955802
4.4ghz 5/4@ 2.5 2 2 5...messed OS installation.GFX @ 420/1.1ghz with OCZ 3700EB ram before formatting
24343 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7956616
1:1 242fsb 2.5 2 2 5, 400core 1100mem
24297 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7956643
252fsb 1:1 @ 3 3 3 8,400core 1.1ghz mem
After formatting at 4.3ghz
22710 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7959178
ultra speeds, 2 3 3 6, turbo, enabled, 8T, 7.8usec @ 5/4,
22666 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7959233
Ultra speeds...256aperture, spread spectrum disabled,legacy usb off,5/4 253fsb 2 3 3 6, turbo, enabled, infinite, 64usec
22657 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7959206
Ultra Speeds...5/4 253fsb 2 3 3 6, turbo, enabled, infinite, 64usec
22605 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7959161
Ultra speeds....253fsb 4.3ghz, 2 3 3 6 turbo,enabled,auto,auto @ 5/4
also
22602 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7956593
233fsb 1:1 2.5 2 2 5, GFX @ stock, dx9b,
as it can be seen with 1:1 and 2.5 2 2 5 with my ocz ram and a lot lower cpu speed i am getting better results.Driver wise i havent got a clue what settings i can change or i need to as well as windows optimisations...i havent done anything at all....
and here is a bench with my X800PRO
with my 2.8 cpu @ 300fsb
26231 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7898218
X800PRO 12 pipelines 500/560?dont remember, 4.2ghz P4, 2.5 2 2 5 5/4
i did a quick run at ultra speeds in 03...i had to run all of the bench...anyways...got me arround 12K at 4.3ghz obviously...
it aint looking good...if only i had some ram capable of 2 2 2 5 @ 260fsb :p
I need to do more testing though...still if an XT comes by at the right price...i am getting oneor an Ultra...
3dmark03 seems too low.
Here´s one of my runs
http://hometown.aol.de/Obergrossmeister/pc/3dmark03.jpg
Ram @ 186mhz lol
youre running 420 core and 1.14 mem though mate...
i am only running ultra speeds and 03 is all about gfx cards isnt it?
i cant bench with my mem that high tbh...hhe
let me check what it can do close to that speedsthanks for the linky...need to confirm whats wrong with my setup if there is something wrong..
There's nothing wrong with your scores. The GT is an extremely watered down version of the Ultra, which is a watered down version of the Ultra Extreme. Those are killer scores for a midrange card.Originally posted by brwmogazos
I was wrong...
4.3ghz...low fsb yeah...and ram i have borrowed off my mate @ 3/2 @ 2.5 4 4 8(spd)
420-1.12 11900 3dmarks..
WTF....why am i getting low scores in everything? lol
using the 60.71 drvs...dx9b and no tweaks in the os or drvs...![]()
I don't think that's fair Kunaak. The GT is only the third to the fastest card nVidia offers. You are comparing it to ATI's first and second. Compare it to ATI's 3rd (9800 XT) and it would be more fair. It is at least equal to the 9800 XT in 2k1 and actually destroys the 9800 XT in 2k3. The GT even competes well with an X800 Pro (actually better than a Pro and not as good as an XT) in 2k3. These are $280.00 cards for god's sake, although you can't get them for that now, just as you can't get a $499.00 X800 XT yet. But prices over the next month should drop down to a more realistic level.
The GT is not the bencher's card, but it looks to be the hands down value leader for gamers.![]()
hold on mate...
so far we have seen the ultras and the GTs...
I AM RUNNING ULTRA SPEEDS HERE...
the GT in latest reviews is close to the XT and Ultra...and is in front of the PRO
getting low 3dmark scores in 01 doesnt prove this card is cr*p...how can u justify my scores being low when the card in reviews only looses by a few fps than the faster ultra and XT?
Who said anything about it being crap? I said it is the best value by far for gamers. It is leaps and bounds behind the Ultra and Ultra Extreme because of the physical differences in the cards. They may bench close at stock speeds but the Ultra and Ultra Extreme are monsters. That extra connector is not just a decoration, and it's only one of the differences between the Ultras and the lower cards. Also, even the Ultra Extreme will not beat the X800 XT in 2k1. Ask Lardarse if you want confirmation of this.
I also said ALL the cards are way inflated right now as far as price is concerned.![]()
Last edited by StormPC; 07-09-2004 at 07:05 AM.