Page 11 of 12 FirstFirst ... 89101112 LastLast
Results 251 to 275 of 297

Thread: X800Pro,, 16 pipelines

  1. #251
    Xtreme X.I.P. Soulburner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    8,868
    Originally posted by StormPC
    How could it do that if CPU doesn't matter?
    Who said CPU doesn't matter?

    Where are you going with this?
    System
    ASUS Z170-Pro
    Skylake i7-6700K @ 4600 Mhz
    MSI GTX 1070 Armor OC
    32 GB G.Skill Ripjaws V
    Samsung 850 EVO (2)
    EVGA SuperNOVA 650 G2
    Corsair Hydro H90
    NZXT S340

  2. #252
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    1,121
    Originally posted by Soulburner
    Who said CPU doesn't matter?

    Where are you going with this?


    "Mother Nature isn't really affected by CPU at all."

    "much lower than it should be, not even matching his score at default clocks."

    "That is ALL GPU and shader power there."
    You don't see how these don't exactly jive with your statement:

    "Maybe because the EE outscores the A64 in that benchmark."


    With all due respect, it takes 4 game tests to score well in 2k3, not 1. Whatever...we've beaten this horse enough I guess.

    Maybe I need a pencil mod???
    Last edited by StormPC; 06-09-2004 at 01:49 PM.

  3. #253
    Xtreme X.I.P. Soulburner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    8,868
    Ok then maybe you didn't know this...which is fine.

    GT1 is a DX7 test, which relies heavily on CPU speed much as 3DMark2001 does.

    GT2-3 your CPU has a very minimal impact on.

    GT4 your CPU has almost no impact on.

    Macci knows his stuff, he wouldn't say something like that unless he really meant it (and yes even after taking into account your CPU).
    System
    ASUS Z170-Pro
    Skylake i7-6700K @ 4600 Mhz
    MSI GTX 1070 Armor OC
    32 GB G.Skill Ripjaws V
    Samsung 850 EVO (2)
    EVGA SuperNOVA 650 G2
    Corsair Hydro H90
    NZXT S340

  4. #254
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    490
    Originally posted by StormPC
    With all due respect, it takes 4 game tests to score well in 2k3, not 1. Whatever...we've beaten this horse enough I guess.

    Maybe I need a pencil mod???
    There is always a place where programs are CPU power laking and GPU power laking...

    In 3dmark03 with R3XX series it was GPU laking... Now with R4XX its CPU laking...
    P4 3.0C 800@3.64 242FSB 1.625Vcore on Ic7 max3(Watercooled)
    Corsair 2x512@DDR484Mhz PC4000( 3-4-4-8 )2.8V
    X800XT@586/594(Watercooled)
    3*Maxtor 120 GB fluid +9 SATA RAID-0
    3Dmark01: 25250--Aquamark3: 66423--3Dmark03: 13780--3dmark05: 6361

  5. #255
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    1,121
    Originally posted by Soulburner
    Ok then maybe you didn't know this...which is fine.

    GT1 is a DX7 test, which relies heavily on CPU speed much as 3DMark2001 does.

    GT2-3 your CPU has a very minimal impact on.

    GT4 your CPU has almost no impact on.

    Macci knows his stuff, he wouldn't say something like that unless he really meant it (and yes even after taking into account your CPU).
    I know that but you have to realize that due to differences in the P4 and A64 architectures sometimes less is more.

    I know what it is. He's using modified DNA CATs and I'm using stock drivers.

    Anyway, what he gets is not very meaningful because he is the tweaking god!

    FOR GOD's SAKE, I JUST GOT THE CARD LAST NIGHT!!!

    Those were my first runs! Forgive me...


    MINI:

    Good point dude. CPU makes more of a difference with the new cards than it used to because they ARE now the bottleneck!:thumbsup:
    Last edited by StormPC; 06-09-2004 at 10:32 AM.

  6. #256
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    370
    The mod failed on a Club3D I have atm. Some data for experience:











    MSI+A64 4000+ X800XT PE : 39179
    TECHSWEDEN.ORG 3D MARK TEAM

  7. #257
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    302
    marquzz, try it again. it looks like your compound is touching the dot in the middle just a bit. remove it and see if you can get a perfect line

  8. #258
    Xtreme AMD Fanboy
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Salem / Corvallis, OR
    Posts
    979
    Soul = patience++

    Proud Founder of Redline 3D

  9. #259
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    St-Hyacinthe,Quebec
    Posts
    375
    Originally posted by Marquzz
    The mod failed on a Club3D I have atm. Some data for experience:









    i got the same stepping on my MSI and doesn't work
    Xtreme Parson Russell Terrier Breeder

    Core I7 920@ 4Ghz
    Asus P6T
    Adata 3x2gb DDR3-1600
    eVGA 9800 GX2

  10. #260
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    22
    Could someone please comment on what's posted on the front page:

    ATI responds quickly
    I spoke with ATI and confirmed that the mod works but the boards will not survive very long. We should expect to see reports of failed attempts and boards that die. . .


    I imagine this could only be because of the increased clock rates (which seems always the official line with clocks), but could the procedure of the pipe-mod, even assuming it's done correctly, shorten lifespan in your opinion?

  11. #261
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    302
    probably just a scare tactic so that people will stop modding and getting more for they pay for

  12. #262
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    1,121
    Originally posted by SuperDude
    probably just a scare tactic so that people will stop modding and getting more for they pay for
    For sure. I think they also want to discourage the mod so they don't have to deal with all the RMAs from people who messed up while doing it.

  13. #263
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    1,349
    lol stormpc this is why i wouldnt want to be the first to get a beasty card as it just came out (in this case the x800xt) people expect you to be getting the best results on your first run, when you havnt even formatted yet and your just mucking around with it. anyways, have u found out how to switch to 1T? or are you going to get another 1 later?
    Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe
    Athlon XP 2800+ Barton @ 3200+ (200x11)
    Mushkin DDR400 BASIC 2*512mb
    Albatron GeForce 6600GT 128mb (Being Repaired)
    Samsung SyncMaster 730BF 17" (4ms RT, 600:1 CR)

  14. #264
    Xtreme X.I.P. Soulburner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    8,868
    I don't think anyone expected anything from him, macci was only making a valid point about his score being low. Considering his card is overclocked and is behind a stock X800Pro in performance, it may be a cause for concern.
    System
    ASUS Z170-Pro
    Skylake i7-6700K @ 4600 Mhz
    MSI GTX 1070 Armor OC
    32 GB G.Skill Ripjaws V
    Samsung 850 EVO (2)
    EVGA SuperNOVA 650 G2
    Corsair Hydro H90
    NZXT S340

  15. #265
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    1,121
    Originally posted by r3b0rN
    lol stormpc this is why i wouldnt want to be the first to get a beasty card as it just came out (in this case the x800xt) people expect you to be getting the best results on your first run, when you havnt even formatted yet and your just mucking around with it. anyways, have u found out how to switch to 1T? or are you going to get another 1 later?
    The option is in the BIOS when the 3700+ is installed but not the 3400+, I'm guessing because it defaults to 1T. The problem is that it doesn't actually work. Have not determined whether it's a bug or whether my hardware is faulty.

    Soulburner,

    I thought I explained the low score pretty well. Macci was doing his Jason impression, that's all. Can we move on yet?

  16. #266
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    United Arab Emirates
    Posts
    33
    I think its all in the CODE (3rd Line), example if lets say a card with code GA8999.1 was successful then ALL cards with the same code should work, it has nothing to do with the last digit example GAXXXX.1 nor the BBA nor the brand itself.Ofcourse this isnt 100% right but im willing to bet on it.

    I got the Sapphire X800PRO & i did the mod at least 5 times to make sure but still with no luck, the steppings on the card are as follows :

    215RAACGA11F
    GB7293.1
    0420AA
    you can also see its week 20 of 2004 which is one of the newest cores.

    Now i went ahead & bought another card made by GeCUBE & when i opened it, it showed this steppings:
    215RAACGA11F
    GA8999.1
    0416AA


    I havent got to modding it yet but if my theory is right it should work.,since most people with the same code were successfull.
    I'll let you guys know how it goes hopefully by tonight.

    EDIT: Added images of both cards.
    Last edited by Naser; 06-09-2004 at 11:55 PM.

  17. #267
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    2,559
    Interesting info there Naser. Let us know how the CeCube card works

    StormPC, sorry the post I made was a bit evil

    BUT the default Nature scores I mentioned there were both ran on my everyday PC which has a normal P4C800-E + 3.0C NW CPU combo in it. So it shouldn't be the reason for the fairly high difference we have in the Nature fps.
    ATI-Drivers/D3D settings prolly make a difference, etc but it could be a chipset/agp/driver -problem too. 70 vs. 87 is quite a difference considering that we are basically useing the same hardware (and default clocks).
    If you get the Nature FPS tweaked to the optimal level it'll give quite a nice boost for the score too

  18. #268
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    19
    OT:
    @ Marquzz and Naser: What digicams are you guys using? These are very detailed shots! I am about to buy a digicam myself and am looking for high quality stuff. So pls be kind and tell me ... ;-)

  19. #269
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    1,349
    Originally posted by macci
    Interesting info there Naser. Let us know how the CeCube card works

    StormPC, sorry the post I made was a bit evil

    BUT the default Nature scores I mentioned there were both ran on my everyday PC which has a normal P4C800-E + 3.0C NW CPU combo in it. So it shouldn't be the reason for the fairly high difference we have in the Nature fps.
    ATI-Drivers/D3D settings prolly make a difference, etc but it could be a chipset/agp/driver -problem too. 70 vs. 87 is quite a difference considering that we are basically useing the same hardware (and default clocks).
    If you get the Nature FPS tweaked to the optimal level it'll give quite a nice boost for the score too
    any computer owned by you automatically performs 10% better than any1 else with the exact same hardware
    Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe
    Athlon XP 2800+ Barton @ 3200+ (200x11)
    Mushkin DDR400 BASIC 2*512mb
    Albatron GeForce 6600GT 128mb (Being Repaired)
    Samsung SyncMaster 730BF 17" (4ms RT, 600:1 CR)

  20. #270
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    370
    Originally posted by SuperDude
    marquzz, try it again. it looks like your compound is touching the dot in the middle just a bit. remove it and see if you can get a perfect line
    Yes, already did it 3 times, as you can see on this picture it's nothing wrong with the mod itself







    Using a Nikon 775 for those who wonder, Nikon has one of the best makros there is.


    MSI+A64 4000+ X800XT PE : 39179
    TECHSWEDEN.ORG 3D MARK TEAM

  21. #271
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    United Arab Emirates
    Posts
    33
    Originally posted by Bastieeeh
    OT:
    @ Marquzz and Naser: What digicams are you guys using? These are very detailed shots! I am about to buy a digicam myself and am looking for high quality stuff. So pls be kind and tell me ... ;-)
    The first picture was using the Fujifilm FinePix 6800Z

    the next one is with the SONY DSC-F828 which i dont not much about but definatly much better then the finepix.

  22. #272
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    61
    IMO, Nasers conclusion is the only one that can be true. Its either what Naser said, or that it is just pure luck to get a card that mods, which i dont believe.
    Originally posted by r3b0rN
    any computer owned by you automatically performs 10% better than any1 else with the exact same hardware
    Works on the same principle as a TypeR sticker

  23. #273
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    114
    here is my mod :




    and the card cooling modded but not tested, because my chiller is not working..











  24. #274
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,573


    Someone over at overclockers.co.uk thinks this might work, as it will connect ALL pipes together... anyone that has failed before want to give it a shot ?

    Naser, Chris_UKs card was a:

    GA8999.1
    0416AA
    Last edited by LilGator; 06-10-2004 at 06:12 AM.

  25. #275
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    22
    Originally posted by SuperDude
    probably just a scare tactic so that people will stop modding and getting more for they pay for
    Yeah thats what I thought too. I so hope this mod works on my sapphire!

    Almost here! It's on the fedex truck right now

Page 11 of 12 FirstFirst ... 89101112 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •