Page 5 of 12 FirstFirst ... 2345678 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 294

Thread: Amd Fsb Ranking

  1. #101
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    126
    Originally posted by VoRtAn_MaDgE
    Happy to see that u reach a very nice goal lasac my friend...
    Is not all days that we see a 1700+ that can handle such mhz
    Congrats m8!
    Vortan
    Hy buddy!

    Glad to see you here too

    Tnks m8

    Now its time to play with my A64
    Conroe E6600 @ 4712.8MHz on VapoLS (+6ºC )
    Asus P5B Deluxe wi-fi edition
    2x1GB CellShock 8000 CL4 @ 1144MHz 4-4-4-12 2.35v
    StockCooled X800GTO with XT bios mod (Sapphire X1900XTX DEAD!)
    Enermax Liberty 620W
    Western Digital 250GB 16MB 7200 SATA2
    Lian-Li PC60

    3Dmark01: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8959998

  2. #102
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    leiria town, portugal
    Posts
    104
    nice to see the "tugas" on top here in xtremesys nice fsb
    bom trabalho Lasac
    hehehehe

  3. #103
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    556
    TUGA Power

    Congrats Lasac

  4. #104
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    1,349
    some freaky fsb getting reached... making my effort look like crap, but here it is anyways -
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	fsb.jpg 
Views:	253 
Size:	72.2 KB 
ID:	10425  
    Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe
    Athlon XP 2800+ Barton @ 3200+ (200x11)
    Mushkin DDR400 BASIC 2*512mb
    Albatron GeForce 6600GT 128mb (Being Repaired)
    Samsung SyncMaster 730BF 17" (4ms RT, 600:1 CR)

  5. #105
    Xtreme Recruit
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Bedfordshire, England
    Posts
    97
    I really think there should have to be a set benchmark everyone has to run to qualify.

    i.e. 3dmark compare URL,

    ....these speed screenshots before the system crashes are pointless imo(even mine is completely unstable at 260)

    ....can we have a 3dmark stable, ranking. I think that is a much better idea.

    Ill start us off. 250fsb NF7-S
    250fsb NF7-S 2.0/ Stock 9800
    Last edited by Cucumber; 03-20-2004 at 02:23 AM.

  6. #106
    Fused
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    2,769
    Originally posted by Cucumber
    I really think there should have to be a set benchmark everyone has to run to qualify.

    i.e. 3dmark compare URL,

    ....these speed screenshots before the system crashes are pointless imo(even mine is completely unstable at 260)

    ....can we have a 3dmark stable, ranking. I think that is a much better idea.

    Ill start us off. 250fsb NF7-S
    250fsb NF7-S 2.0/ Stock 9800
    :thumbsup:

    Ranking Reset to 0

    to put name in ranking as cucumber said

    Compare link for 3D mark 2001 or 3D Mark 2003 score.... :thumbsup:

  7. #107
    Fused
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    2,769
    Rank update... i will put the compare link on the 1st page

    so if click those FSB MHz they will show u compare link

  8. #108
    Xtreme Recruit
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Bedfordshire, England
    Posts
    97
    3DMark reports 1fsb lower dude, its 250.

    249x9.5 = 2365mhz,

    link shows 2381mhz

    ...does it with all of em

    240fsb showing 239fsb

    ...oh and its Twinmos 43b chips, not BH5

    ....Cheers
    Last edited by Cucumber; 03-20-2004 at 03:18 AM.

  9. #109
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    1,349
    could we make it 3dmark2001se build330 ONLY !!!
    3dmark03 isnt very cpu intensive at all, and therefore wont test stability as much.
    Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe
    Athlon XP 2800+ Barton @ 3200+ (200x11)
    Mushkin DDR400 BASIC 2*512mb
    Albatron GeForce 6600GT 128mb (Being Repaired)
    Samsung SyncMaster 730BF 17" (4ms RT, 600:1 CR)

  10. #110
    AMD Fanboy
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Luis Obispo, California
    Posts
    2,251
    Dell Studio XPS16... no desktop
    yes i have AIM, yes you can send me a message. EvilSpork3 i dare you.

  11. #111
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Br!ban3 / Aus / State: St0n3d
    Posts
    1,452
    How the hell do you guys get soo high fsb.

    Make a FAQ sticky

    Ripping it up on old technology
    i4memory.com

  12. #112
    Fused
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    2,769
    OK 3D Mark 2001 ONLY!

    :thumbsup:

    lets see who is the highest stable FSB

  13. #113
    Fused
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    2,769
    Originally posted by Evil_Spork
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7499774

    255fsb, 12-18, dfi infinty
    emmmm... that is 200MHz FSB

  14. #114
    AMD Fanboy
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Luis Obispo, California
    Posts
    2,251
    clockgen.. 3dmark sees what the comp boots at... =-\
    Dell Studio XPS16... no desktop
    yes i have AIM, yes you can send me a message. EvilSpork3 i dare you.

  15. #115
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    MA.
    Posts
    1,783
    What about PCMark2k2?
    That stresses CPU and memory.
    And it shows the bios settings, not clockgen or 8rdavcore settings.
    Zen2 Has brought AMD back!

  16. #116
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    1,349
    Originally posted by Evil_Spork
    clockgen.. 3dmark sees what the comp boots at... =-\
    this is true. this might actually cause a bit of a problem... up to u tictac.

    we could actually tell if these bench's are true or not by looking at the cpu reliant tests - eg car high, if it gets a good score, we'll know its not fake.
    Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe
    Athlon XP 2800+ Barton @ 3200+ (200x11)
    Mushkin DDR400 BASIC 2*512mb
    Albatron GeForce 6600GT 128mb (Being Repaired)
    Samsung SyncMaster 730BF 17" (4ms RT, 600:1 CR)

  17. #117
    JLS
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    heartland,USA
    Posts
    445

  18. #118
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    1,349
    Originally posted by muzz
    What about PCMark2k2?
    That stresses CPU and memory.
    And it shows the bios settings, not clockgen or 8rdavcore settings.
    better yet pcmark04 with latest build. i dont know much about this bench but because its so focused on system and is a recent release from futuremark, it should be able to detect fsb properly. some1 whos familiar with this bench, tell me if it gives accurate fsb readings plz.
    Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe
    Athlon XP 2800+ Barton @ 3200+ (200x11)
    Mushkin DDR400 BASIC 2*512mb
    Albatron GeForce 6600GT 128mb (Being Repaired)
    Samsung SyncMaster 730BF 17" (4ms RT, 600:1 CR)

  19. #119
    Xtreme Recruit
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Bedfordshire, England
    Posts
    97
    Yeh, not really fussed which benchmark. As long as it lasts like 5mins+ to show some form of stability

    rather than....

    *Finger ready on the printscreen button*
    *clockgen easy to reach to back it down strait away again*

    ...seems rather pointless

  20. #120
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    MA.
    Posts
    1,783
    Well PCMark 2k2 ( have not used 2k4) takes a few minutes to complete.
    Definitely not a printscreen type test.
    Zen2 Has brought AMD back!

  21. #121
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Europe, Estonia, Tallinn
    Posts
    57
    Originally posted by tictac
    emmmm... that is 200MHz FSB
    dude, 3dmark shows wrong... if i clock in windows (not in bios) it also shows wrong (shows bios fsb).

    well, here are my 3dmark2001 @241fsb (dont do higher cause of cpu)
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7624976
    and pcmark2002 @244fsb
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm=1738621
    AMD Athlon64 3000+
    AC Freezer 64 Pro
    Epox 9NPA+ Ultra
    2x512mb pc3200 PQI
    Sparkle Geforce 6600GT
    Seagate Barracuda 200gb 8mb
    420w Enlight PSU

    3DMark scores: work in progress!

  22. #122
    Fused
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    2,769
    now that will be another problem coz....

    when all people give orb link with certain fsb n they claim it higher than that.....

  23. #123
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Poole UK.
    Posts
    306
    247 DC

    Mushkin Black Lvl2 PC3500
    DFI Infinity.

    I'll try and improve on it once you decide what the bench is going to be.

    TDF.
    Infinity XP1700 247x9
    2x256Mb PC3500 Mushkin Level II 11-2-2-2-2-13-15
    Phase change in (slow) progress.

  24. #124
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Europe, Estonia, Tallinn
    Posts
    57
    Originally posted by tictac
    now that will be another problem coz....

    when all people give orb link with certain fsb n they claim it higher than that.....
    yea

    maybe you choose another program to compare... sisandra!?
    AMD Athlon64 3000+
    AC Freezer 64 Pro
    Epox 9NPA+ Ultra
    2x512mb pc3200 PQI
    Sparkle Geforce 6600GT
    Seagate Barracuda 200gb 8mb
    420w Enlight PSU

    3DMark scores: work in progress!

  25. #125
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    MA.
    Posts
    1,783
    Has anyone confirmed whether PCMark2k4 shows the correct speeds when using clockgen?
    Zen2 Has brought AMD back!

Page 5 of 12 FirstFirst ... 2345678 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •