Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: [news] Intel unlocked 28-core Xeon W-3175X processor will not be soldered

  1. #1
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Grimsby, UK
    Posts
    666

    [news] Intel unlocked 28-core Xeon W-3175X processor will not be soldered

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Campbell at OC3D | Posted: 10 October 2018
    Intel confirms that their unlocked 28-core Xeon W-3175X processor will not be soldered
    When Intel announced their 9th Generation of Core and Core-X series processors, the company made a point to list the inclusion of a Solder Thermal Interface Material STIM) for both of their new product lines. This change will allow their new processors to transfer heat away from their silicon in a more efficient matter, lowering load temperatures while increasing overclocking headroom, especially on their new X299 series products.

    Things are a little different with their planned Xeon W-3175X processor, Intel's unlocked 28-core monstrosity that is set to offer server-grade features, an insane core count and overclockability in a single package.

    After considering Intel's use of their Xeon brand name and the company's already expensive 18-core i9-9980XE, which $1,979 RCP for 1K orders, it is undeniable that Intel's Xeon W-3175X will be ludicrously expensive, but the product has one crucial flaw that is worth mentioning.

    When speaking to Anand Srivatsa, the vice president of Intel's desktop, systems and channel group, PC World confirmed that the company's unlocked Xeon will not feature Soldered TIM, instead relying on Intel's existing polymer-based thermal interface material. Intel's overclocking-ready Xeon will use a thermally limiting thermal interface material, a product which has a higher core count than any other unlocked Intel processor and is, therefore, most likely to be thermally restricted when overclocked.

    You can watch PC World's interview with Anand Srivatsa in the video below.



    The reason behind Intel's decision to use polymer-based TIM is clear, as no other product in their LGA3647 product stack uses STIM, making its use unfeasible for a low-volume product like the Xeon W-3175X. Even so, this design decision makes it likely that pro overclockers will need likely need to delid their W-3175X processors to achieve peak performance, which something that nobody should have to do on a processor that will be worth multiple thousand dollars.

    Intel's reasoning behind their Xeon W-3175X processor is simple, it's a statement that says that still sit at the peak of the processor market. It says loud and clear that they can do better than AMD, at least right now, releasing a processor that offers 28 cores on a single die while offering higher clock speeds out of the box than AMD's Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX and have direct access to six-channel memory channels. Intel doesn't intend to sell this processor in huge numbers; the Xeon W-3175X is a showpiece and little else.
    Source: OC3D / PCWorld
    Last edited by Nelly; 10-15-2018 at 02:29 PM. Reason: Added source
    i5 2500K @ 4.9GHz MSI Z77 MPower G.Skill Trident 8GB 2400C10
    EVGA GTX 1070 SC 8GB @ 1784/4004MHz Corsair HX 750 PSU
    Samsung 830 256GB Creative ZxR Thermalright Silver Arrow
    NEC 24WMGX3 24" TFT Fractal Design Define S Win 7/10 64bit

  2. #2
    I am Xtreme zanzabar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    SF bay area, CA
    Posts
    15,871
    They really want to make sure you cannot overclock without clearly voiding the warranty.
    5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
    samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    494
    for that much that thermal compound needs to be golden

  4. #4
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    NE Ohio, USA
    Posts
    1,608
    Well, when the 2990WX was dropped on their a$$e$, they were probably a little rushed to get at least something out...minus some important little things lol.
    24/7 Cruncher #1
    Crosshair VII Hero, Ryzen 3900X, 4.0 GHz @ 1.225v, Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420 AIO, 4x8GB GSKILL 3600MHz C15, ASUS TUF 3090 OC
    Samsung 980 1TB NVMe, Samsung 870 QVO 1TB, 2x10TB WD Red RAID1, Win 10 Pro, Enthoo Luxe TG, EVGA SuperNOVA 1200W P2

    24/7 Cruncher #2
    ASRock X470 Taichi, Ryzen 3900X, 4.0 GHz @ 1.225v, Arctic Liquid Freezer 280 AIO, 2x16GB GSKILL NEO 3600MHz C16, EVGA 3080ti FTW3 Ultra
    Samsung 970 EVO 250GB NVMe, Samsung 870 EVO 500GBWin 10 Ent, Enthoo Pro, Seasonic FOCUS Plus 850W

    24/7 Cruncher #3
    GA-P67A-UD4-B3 BIOS F8 mod, 2600k (L051B138) @ 4.5 GHz, 1.260v full load, Arctic Liquid 120, (Boots Win @ 5.6 GHz per Massman binning)
    Samsung Green 4x4GB @2133 C10, EVGA 2080ti FTW3 Hybrid, Samsung 870 EVO 500GB, 2x1TB WD Red RAID1, Win10 Ent, Rosewill Rise, EVGA SuperNOVA 1300W G2

    24/7 Cruncher #4 ... Crucial M225 64GB SSD Donated to Endurance Testing (Died at 968 TB of writes...no that is not a typo!)
    GA-EP45T-UD3LR BIOS F10 modded, Q6600 G0 VID 1.212 (L731B536), 3.6 GHz 9x400 @ 1.312v full load, Zerotherm Zen FZ120
    OCZ 2x2GB DDR3-1600MHz C7, Gigabyte 7950 @1200/1250, Crucial MX100 128GB, 2x1TB WD Red RAID1, Win10 Ent, Centurion 590, XFX PRO650W

    Music System
    SB Server->SB Touch w/Android Tablet as a remote->Denon AVR-X3300W->JBL Studio Series Floorstanding Speakers, JBL LS Center, 2x SVS SB-2000 Subs


Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •