Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: [News] AMD "Vega 20" with 32 GB HBM2 3DMark 11 Score Surfaces

  1. #1
    Join XS BOINC Team StyM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Tropics
    Posts
    9,468

    [News] AMD "Vega 20" with 32 GB HBM2 3DMark 11 Score Surfaces

    https://www.techpowerup.com/243758/a...score-surfaces

    With the latest Radeon Vega Instinct reveal, it's becoming increasingly clear that "Vega 20" is an optical shrink of the "Vega 10" GPU die to the new 7 nm silicon fabrication process, which could significantly lower power-draw, enabling AMD to increase clock-speeds. A prototype graphics card based on "Vega 20," armed with a whopping 32 GB of HBM2 memory, was put through 3DMark 11, on a machine powered by a Ryzen 7 1700 processor, and compared with a Radeon Vega Frontier Edition.

    The prototype had lower GPU clock-speeds than the Vega Frontier Edition, at 1.00 GHz, vs. up to 1.60 GHz of the Vega Frontier Edition. Its memory, however, was clocked higher, at 1250 MHz (640 GB/s) vs. 945 MHz (483 GB/s). Despite significantly lower GPU clocks, the supposed "Vega 20" prototype appears to score higher performance clock-for-clock, but loses out on overall performance, in all tests. This could mean "Vega 20" is not just an optical-shrink of "Vega 10," but also benefits from newer architecture features, besides faster memory.

  2. #2
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    Kinda screams fake or just wrong clocks reported.
    Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.

    -Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.

    Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P. ), Juan J. Guerrero

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    1,402
    why that ?

  4. #4
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    You expect a die shrink and maybe a few architectural optimizations ( also, consider the fact that a few people, including the organizer, R. Kuduri abandoned the ship during the time ) to make up for 600MHz of GPU clock frequency ?
    It's like you're expecting a Ryzen 3 @ 3GHz to perform better than a Ryzen 2 @ 4GHz ( with both products coming just a year apart )
    Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.

    -Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.

    Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P. ), Juan J. Guerrero

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member AbortRetryFail?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    367
    Quote Originally Posted by madcho View Post
    why that ?

    Well beyond my pay-grade but IMHO the forest is missing its trees John McEnroe on Line 1, sports fans ...

    Initial silly-con of the Radeon Vega 2(.)0 Instinct ? with ?clocks,? a Ryzen 7 1700 CPU and 3DMark 11. I?m thinking volume discounts in the next 90 days on those fancy new $400k nVidia DGX-2 clusters

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •