Obvious and yet they make an article saying what is obvious. Amazing.
I'm not really surprised about this at all either.
50% more cores, lower clocks, nearly 50% more performance.
I wish that there would be more focus on single or low threaded performance. I'm already tired of the Core-Peen trend, probably because I simply don't utilise them XD
Core i7 7700K| ASUS Z270F | 16Gb DDR4 | GTX1080Ti | Watercooled CPU+GPU | 512GB 950Pro
So why is it customary to post specs in sigs anyway?
In other news, 6 cores > 4 cores.
The Cardboard Master Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64
that's nearly 50% more cores!
Sigs are obnoxious.
So 6.5% slower on single threaded?
When i'm being paid i always do my job through.
some of those scores make the 7800x look pretty good.
8700k...will be slightly better oc than 7800x ? im guessing. plus the motherboard is cheaper than x299.
im just weighing these two options ...
i7 3610QM 1.2-3.2GHz
7800x is a product that shouldn't exist
8700k is almost what intel desperately hoped that 7800x could have been...
9700k was supposed to be the 8700k, really, but 10nm is hard
Sigs are obnoxious.
Bookmarks