Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: [News] Amazon claims AI is having an ?amazing renaissance?

  1. #1
    Join XS BOINC Team StyM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Tropics
    Posts
    9,468

    [News] Amazon claims AI is having an ?amazing renaissance?

    http://www.fudzilla.com/news/43605-a...ng-renaissance

    Amazon boss Jeff Bezos claims that Artificial intelligence development has seen an "amazing renaissance" and is beginning to solve problems that were once seen as science fiction.

    "It is a renaissance, it is a golden age," Bezos told an audience at the Internet Association's annual gala last week.

    Unfortunately, it has not helped solve that American problem of using the wrong word. For AI to be undergoing a renaissance it would have had to have been around before. The term was first coined in the 16th century and it means ?revival?. Bezos should have asked his AI Alexa for the right word before saying it.

    Bezos said that Amazon was now solving problems with machine learning and artificial intelligence that were in the realm of science fiction for the last several decades. ?And natural language understanding, machine vision problems, it really is an amazing renaissance."

    Bezos called AI an "enabling layer" that will "improve every business".

    At Amazon, Bezos said that "cool" developments like Alexa and its Prime Air delivery drones use "tremendous amounts" of AI. But machine learning is being deployed across the company.

    "I would say, a lot of the value that we're getting from machine learning is actually happening kind of beneath the surface. It is things like improved search results, improved product recommendations for customers, improved forecasting for inventory management, and literally hundreds of other things beneath the surface," Bezos said.

    The Amazon CEO also said that the company is making AI techniques available to enterprise customers through its cloud division, Amazon Web Services.

  2. #2
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    I'm not sure what Fudo's issue with the use of "renaissance" is here. Maybe they don't remember how AI was a major topic in the late 80s and early 90s back when the algorithms and computational power were insufficient to achieve much. Things went dormant for a couple of decades. That word would seem to describe situations like this.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •