Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: [News] Publishers losing battle against adbockers

  1. #1
    Join XS BOINC Team StyM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Tropics
    Posts
    9,468

    [News] Publishers losing battle against adbockers

    http://www.fudzilla.com/news/42777-p...inst-adbockers

    Publishers are losing the battle against adblockers because they don?t seem to get that people don?t want their screens blocked with annoying adverts and videos that turn themselves on and blast load sales pitches at them.

    A new report on global user trends in adblocking has found that the countermeasures which publishing companies take to block content to adblock users are ?ineffective?.

    The survey, by pro-ad organisation PlayFair, found that 74 percent of users abandon websites when they are presented with an adblock wall, with only 26 percent following the requirement to disable adblocking in order to gain access to the site.

    The report said that adblocking has risen 30 percent year on year since 2015, and has risen by 40 percent in the crucial Asia-Pacific market in 2016 alone.

    The survey was based on 4000 internet users in the United States, and uses statistics on downloads of the EasyList adblock blacklist and user counts from Chrome and Firefox adblock extensions, among other sources.

    From December 2016, the report estimates that 615 million devices around the world are blocking ads, 62 percent of which are on mobile devices, the biggest area of growth for the adblocking demographic, presumably due to data cap limits.

    Those who use adblocks are smarter than the average internet user, 1.5 times more likely to possess a bachelor?s degree, increasing to three times more likely among 18-24 year olds.

    More than 94 percent of global mobile adblocking is taking place in Asia, though the report does not specify whether this is likely to be at the network service level.

    India has risen from 32 percent adblocking use to 59 percent in two years with 136 million users taking advantage of adblock software. China is in second place, with 106 million adblocked devices, but a much lower percent take-up per capita.

    The key reason for the growth of adblocking, besides the principal concern about virus infection, is cited as ?interruptive? ad formats, such as interstitial ads which hijack the process of heading to a URL and may require ad hoc or timed dwelling before the content can be reached.

    Other key factors include slow page loading time, excessive ads per page and privacy tracking.

    The daft thing is that 77 per cent of users find some form of advertising permissible. Half of them are ok with static banner ads and 35 per cent preferring skippable video ads. The most hated ad format is apparently the non-skippable video ad, followed by autoplaying audio ads.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    421
    Quote Originally Posted by StyM View Post
    The most hated ad format is apparently the non-skippable video ad, followed by autoplaying audio ads.
    Imo followed closely by animated\flashing banner adds
    TJ08-EW 6700k@4.7 1.375v - Z170-GENE - 2x8g 3866 16-16-16 - 1070@ 2088\9500MHz -Samsung 830 64G, Sandisk Ultra II 960G, WD Green 3tb - Seasonic XP1050 - Dell U2713 - Pioneer Todoroki 5.1 Apogee Drive II - EK VGA-HF Supreme - Phobia 200mm Rad - Silverstone AP181 Project Darkling
    3770k vs 6700k RAM Scaling, HT vs RAM, Arma III CPU vs RAM, Thief CPU vs RAM

  3. #3
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    687
    Quote Originally Posted by dasa View Post
    Imo followed closely by animated\flashing banner adds
    TBH honest i dont have anything againts ads, be it text .img ones or even flash ones that stay in their spot.
    BUT, ads that open whole new window to open a video, thats just barbaric.
    If teh ads stayed teh same way as they once were, jpgs and gifs in banner spaces, i wouldnt bother to do adblocks.
    Intel 5960X@4.2Ghz[Prime stable]@4.5 [XTU stable] 1.24v NB@3.6ghz Asrock X99 Extreme 3 4x8GB Corsair Vengeance@3200 16-17-17
    Sapphire nitro+ VEGA 56 Samsung SSD 850 256GB Crucial MX100 512GB HDD:WD10TB WD:8TB Seagate8TB

  4. #4
    Xtreme Mentor dengyong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    A great place again
    Posts
    2,589
    I'm gonna block it all until I break the internet.

  5. #5
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    If a site doesn't work without advertisements, the site does not exist as far as I am concerned.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  6. #6
    Xtremely High Voltage Sparky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    16,040
    Security concerns, page performance, and being downright nuisances - all reasons to kill ads.

    Static banners on the side or whatnot don't bother me, even a mildly animated one in the form of a simple GIF can be OK. But most ads have crossed the line into irritatingly obtrusive a long time ago. If they think that getting in my face is going to make me want to buy their stuff, well, screw them, I have purposely NOT purchased stuff from companies due to their utterly irritating ad practices.
    The Cardboard Master
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    382
    I dont mind the banner ads, so long as the site doesnt end up looking like a geocities webpage; security is the main reason I run Ad-Block, however
    my mini-fridge
    MoBo: GA-EP45-UD3P | CPU: Q9550 3.6GHZ @ 1.216v | RAM: 4x1GB 900mhz @ 5-5-5-15 | GPU: GTX 460 900G/1800S/4400M | PSU: Corsair 750TX| HDD's: Seagate 320GB + 500GB, Samsung 1TB | Case: antec p180

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •