Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: [News] AMD's Upcoming Ryzen Chips to Reportedly Overclock @ 5 GHz On Air

  1. #1
    Join XS BOINC Team StyM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Tropics
    Posts
    9,468

    [News] AMD's Upcoming Ryzen Chips to Reportedly Overclock @ 5 GHz On Air

    https://www.techpowerup.com/229090/a...k-5-ghz-on-air

    French hardware magazine "CANARD PC HARDWARE" has apparently confirmed that AMD's upcoming Ryzen chips will be able to achieve overclocks of at least 5 GHz on air, if an easter egg hidden on the magazine's Ryzen feature. On page 10 of the digital magazine (which you can look at on the provided link) as well as the physical version, a cryptic string of binary code can be found on top of the page (for reference, the string is as follows: 01011010011001010110111001001111010000110100000001 0000010110100101110010001111010011010101000111). When you paste this string of binary code on any online binary to plain text converter, you get a revelation that's sure to put a little more coal on the hype train's furnace: ZenOC@Air=5G.

    Apparently, the entire article is premised on an early engineering sample that the magazine managed to put its hands on - so we're not even talking about final-stepping silicon. Granted, the information, left as more of an Easter egg tease than a reveal onto itself, raises more questions than it answers (as any good, hype-generating event always does): at what voltage were the 5 GHz achieved at? How many cores did the Ryzen sample possess? Were they all operational? Was it a stable overclock? If so, for how long? What cooling solution was used?

    There are potentially many more questions left unanswered by this tease, but nevertheless, this seems like a good sign for the Ryzen bandwagon.

  2. #2
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    Its nonsense. Not possible with AIR. Maybe they means Kaby Lake 5 GHz.
    5 GHz Ryzen LN2 is doable, but not with AIR.



    Look at screen, its part of i7-Kaby, not to Ryzen
    Last edited by FlanK3r; 12-30-2016 at 02:56 PM.
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  3. #3
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    578
    According to CanardPC (they responded to Internet chatter related to their print article), the binary code is accurate, and that their source was able to OC to 5 GHz on air with a single core. Allegedly what was holding the overclock back were weak motherboard VRMs.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    HD0
    Posts
    2,646
    I'm taking this with a grain (or 1000) of salt.


    I'd be THRILLED if AMD reached ivy bridge performance and clocks but with 8 cores and HT at a decent price.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member EternityZX9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Nursing Student -or- Beta Testing Escape From Tarkov
    Posts
    421
    As much as I want AMD to do well, this comment pretty much sum up this bs.
    Intel Core i7 7700K | MSI Z270 XPOWER G.T. | EVGA 1080Ti SC2 | 16GB DDR4 G.Skill Trident Z 3200 | Samsung S27A950D | 3 x Samsung 850 EVO (250GB, 2 x 2TB) | EVGA Supernova P2 1200w | Coolermaster Cosmos II

  6. #6
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    889
    Intel 8700k
    16GB
    Asus z370 Prime
    1080 Ti
    x2 Samsung 850Evo 500GB
    x 1 500 Samsung 860Evo NVME


    Swiftech Apogee XL2
    Swiftech MCP35X x2
    Full Cover GPU blocks
    360 x1, 280 x1, 240 x1, 120 x1 Radiators

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member EternityZX9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Nursing Student -or- Beta Testing Escape From Tarkov
    Posts
    421
    StAndrew
    Intel Core i7 7700K | MSI Z270 XPOWER G.T. | EVGA 1080Ti SC2 | 16GB DDR4 G.Skill Trident Z 3200 | Samsung S27A950D | 3 x Samsung 850 EVO (250GB, 2 x 2TB) | EVGA Supernova P2 1200w | Coolermaster Cosmos II

  8. #8
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    578
    https://translate.google.com/transla...-text=&act=url

    In spite of everything, we know with almost certainty that the CPU that we used for the tests actually came close to the 5 GHz with an (huge) air-dissipator. The I / O multiplier is not clamped at this time and is configured in steps of 0.25x. One heart, however, was active; The Motherboard VRMs seemed at that time too unstable to test with all of the cores. Other Ryzen ES are currently in the hands of overclockers and you should not delay to learn more: a demonstration of overclocking could occur at the CES if good results are achieved.
    (that's the best Google Translate can provide)

    original:

    http://www.cpchardware.com/cpc-hardw...elucubrations/

    Bottom line: 5 GHz, one core, VRMs holding it back.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •