https://www.chiphell.com/thread-1635321-1-1.html
TLR
Wrecks 750`s face.
Is not bottlenecked by PCIe 2.0 x4
No difference for avg. user. vs bigger brother.
Power users like in Anandtech`s The Destroyer bench will benefit from 750ssd but not applicable to 99% of user base.
Slower in every single benchmark, you mean.Originally Posted by SinOfLiberty
Donate to XS forums
as i mentioned, avg user wont see a difference. unless you are dev
plus it uses 16nm nand as opposed to 20
really, all in OP
16nm vs 20nm is more of a detractor, lower endurance.
the 600p seems a lot slower too, only benefit seems to be $/GB ~ .35/GB vs ~.70/GB which is certainly nice.
do people even read Op?
A lot slower? It is true for 1% of people: devs.
lol @ at amount of BS. Butthurt nvme users...
you cannot say it wreaks face. it might be the budget champ, or cost king, but not that it wreaks the 750. it is just under half the speed/iops and the SMI controller does not do mixed operations. it is also 4 bit micron tlc and that is much sliower than micron mlc or samsung 3 bit tlc.
it was like when you posted the 1060 3g review and it was the worst in the line up but you said it was the winner.
5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi
1060 6gb did win vs 980Ti cause, 1060 is such tdp limited that once it is unlocked it will blow Ti away. Even with stock tdp it rivaled 980Ti losing by what 3fps? You cant deny that. The comment section to that video was blown away as well by its performance.
Here, again people dont read OP, no one will ever see the diffference between the 2 unless you are a dev working on the heavy workloads. Not sure why brag about it, if there is smth you cant utilize and yet costs more, plus runs on older tech.
According to Anandtech:750 was an overkill in many ways as a consumer product, not unlocking its full potential.
no one was saying they were not good, you just cannot say they are better.
5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi
Yes devs will utilize SSDs 750 to its limits but for everyone else?.. Intel 600p have their own advantages over the predecessor as aforementioned.
only little over $100 more in price the SM961 rips the 600p in speeds
Last edited by iboomalot; 08-30-2016 at 03:56 PM.
i7 6700K @4.8 ghz
XSPC RayStorm (very nice block)
Z170 Sabertooh ,, 32GB- Gskill (15-15-15-36 @3600 mhz) 1:1
XFX-7970 with Swiftech Komodo nickel block
Water Cooling - MO-RA3 Pro with 4 Silverstone 180mm @ 700 rpm, Twin Vario mcp-655 pumps
Samsung 850-1TB SSD,, OCZ ZX-1250W (powerfull and silent)
Crossfire 30" decent monitor for IPS too bad SED tech died
Docsis2.0
Docsis3.0
-- People who reject the idea that "government has a responsibility to reduce income inequality" give an average of four times more than people who accept that proposition.
1) Cant compare 1TB SSD which costs a fortune pllus has higher IO than lower size models
2)Not sure how did they get the result but here http://imgur.com/a/NnVxc it was installed in standard user machine and results are not great.
And here is a low end 600p 256GB ssd almost matching the random 4K write speed of the 950 pro :0 http://imgur.com/a/9SrIi
Fking images always fck fail
Last edited by SinOfLiberty; 08-30-2016 at 04:27 PM.
here's my 950 Pro..
LOL
did 600p 512 just beat 950 PROPlus it has 4K random write of 130mb/s, which in real world scenario is literally the same as 950 PRO at 131mbs and 157mbs as shown in this bench RIP 950
From Guru 256GB
From Legit Reviews 512GB
plus intel has much better sustained performance than sumsung ssds
And I Fucing FINALLY GOT THE IMAGES to display
Last edited by SinOfLiberty; 08-30-2016 at 06:50 PM.
here's my 950 Pro...
So intel 600P does outperform it in 4k-64 Writes and has random 4K writes of 130mbs vs 137mbs
Your result and others is like at pcie 2.0 lol
Last edited by SinOfLiberty; 08-30-2016 at 11:15 PM.
several reviewers already noted it that 4k on 950 is slow when compared to 750.
probably they'll improve it on 960.
As long as you have an empty pcie slot, does not matter which one, must stick one NVME SSD!
It is a must, seriously
At $490 the SM961 looks to be a winner winner chicken dinner
i7 6700K @4.8 ghz
XSPC RayStorm (very nice block)
Z170 Sabertooh ,, 32GB- Gskill (15-15-15-36 @3600 mhz) 1:1
XFX-7970 with Swiftech Komodo nickel block
Water Cooling - MO-RA3 Pro with 4 Silverstone 180mm @ 700 rpm, Twin Vario mcp-655 pumps
Samsung 850-1TB SSD,, OCZ ZX-1250W (powerfull and silent)
Crossfire 30" decent monitor for IPS too bad SED tech died
-- People who reject the idea that "government has a responsibility to reduce income inequality" give an average of four times more than people who accept that proposition.
Last edited by SinOfLiberty; 08-31-2016 at 09:06 AM.
it's a winner if you can find one... lol.
Why better?
The max 4k write IOPS on the intel 750ssd 1TB is up to 290, which would translate into ~~2000mbs. Intel is undisputed champ in this area.
No one will get to such speeds except for 1% userbase who actually somehow managed to utilize the ssd to death.
This is Summy fanboy thread. It is better cuz I has it lol
Last edited by SinOfLiberty; 09-01-2016 at 11:44 AM.
removed!
Last edited by SinOfLiberty; 09-01-2016 at 06:30 PM.
It does beat 950Pro at half the price, lolz. Keep in mind this is fresh OS install so the 4k speeds are bit slow, but will rise up when the drive is put under high load. Watch chiphell review
Last edited by SinOfLiberty; 09-01-2016 at 06:14 PM.
gOD DAMN, MAzafaka: 100C
Last edited by SinOfLiberty; 09-01-2016 at 11:56 PM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks