Windows 10 overclocking and results

[Charles Wirth]

Intel 5960X @ 5Ghz
Asus Rampage V Extreme
Gskill 3200 @ 3200C12 12-13-15-15-266 1T
Thermaltake Ultimate 3.0 cooler

4.7Ghz cache

Lots of stuff broken in Windows 10 and more results incoming.


Threaded stock speed, no fan on CPU.








HT ON


4.9Ghz HT OFF


4.9Ghz HT ON








4.9Ghz

[Charles Wirth]

I really like Windows 10, they fixed a lot of stuff I did not like about windows 8+1

It was easy to mess up the install, seems a bit too touchy with memory maxed out.

[Xtreme Addict]

I can't see images

[Movieman]

I can, looks good Charles..Thanks for this

[TheGoat Eater]

I can't see images

Turn off Ad-Blocker

[stuffme]

If there is no comparison the windows 7 or 8, what's the point of these benchmarks? Is it faster or slower?

[Xtreme Addict]

Turn off Ad-Blocker

Okay worked.

Any comparison to Win 7/8 with same settings?

[Charles Wirth]

Yea, switched today.

I gotta reload Win 10 as it wont come out of a repair loop.

I had to do 2k3, bench didn't start. PCMark had an issue, maxmem, and I wanted an aida64 bandwidth

[22JHP]

8320 4.5 ghz, win10 less 500 physics points on 3dmark11.

[paulbagz]

Turn off Ad-Blocker

God no haha.

-PB

[alpha0ne]

Turn off Ad-Blocker

I'd be more likely to shove a blunt pencil into my eye !!!

What happened to win 9 ??

[Greg83]

I'd be more likely to shove a blunt pencil into my eye !!!

What happened to win 9 ??

10 is decimal for completion. just like 10 years of longhorn dumped when "found the secret os of NT creator"

i guess he rose from the dead and did it again. and now is in your system. like brittney spears.

i still assume 11 will be the next windows 3.1 and 10 will look all dos to us. cause we'll have actual start menu like 10. a rom for the core. flashable rom for the drivers and cloud based on our own systems for the ease of usages.

like a hardware based windows.

microsoft did fire all the r&d team for good reason.

i made like 007 my moms m user . on her tablet boot FULL from cold boot 8.1 in 1-2 seconds. just before microsoft fired all r&d team. did make microwinX just before the secret that defeated longhorn. and just did strink by 1/2 MB the drivers fold in windows 10. for what i consider a KERNAL. web browser no audio no anything but ui and web browswer. for drivers.

by my caculations if i do 100 1 at a time removal of system32 (easier , cause syswow 64 only needs microwinX being 32bit kernal like i designed for myself in xp and all programs got their own .dlls in folder since, developers know what the f they're using best)

32 days to complete that task next.

ya i don't mind, i'd never have made it work for anyone else anyway.

[Hornet331]

10 is decimal for completion. just like 10 years of longhorn dumped when "found the secret os of NT creator"

i guess he rose from the dead and did it again. and now is in your system. like brittney spears.

i still assume 11 will be the next windows 3.1 and 10 will look all dos to us. cause we'll have actual start menu like 10. a rom for the core. flashable rom for the drivers and cloud based on our own systems for the ease of usages.

like a hardware based windows.

microsoft did fire all the r&d team for good reason.

i made like 007 my moms m user . on her tablet boot FULL from cold boot 8.1 in 1-2 seconds. just before microsoft fired all r&d team. did make microwinX just before the secret that defeated longhorn. and just did strink by 1/2 MB the drivers fold in windows 10. for what i consider a KERNAL. web browser no audio no anything but ui and web browswer. for drivers.

by my caculations if i do 100 1 at a time removal of system32 (easier , cause syswow 64 only needs microwinX being 32bit kernal like i designed for myself in xp and all programs got their own .dlls in folder since, developers know what the f they're using best)

32 days to complete that task next.

ya i don't mind, i'd never have made it work for anyone else anyway.

As for the topic,
reference numbers with 7/8 would be nice to have with the same hardware specs.

[Sparky]

<bunch of weird ramblings>

Um, drugs are bad, mkay?

[kromosto]

Thanks for expressing my feelings too.

[m0da]

Thanks for expressing my feelings too.

It makes sense after a couple of read-throughs. He has some valuable knowledge to share.

http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/5500...owinx-project/

[Greg83]

icey icey
must speak in picture

in Me Me we trust. em in em

1-10 decimal system
1-12 imperial system

inches imperial
cm mm decimal.

completion is 10. end of NTfs systems. beginning of next.
fat32 is needed for EFS bootup bootloader
NTfs is needed for windowsCORE the first 500MB or so maybe 300 files

which allows the none bootable ReFS to be where the CLOUD on your system itself is. for the remainder of the operating system. which you the user has access to and requires. for outside of operating system tasks. your USER space.

[PatRaceTin]

When new Windows come ,many of overclock things always broken.

[rge]

8320 4.5 ghz, win10 less 500 physics points on 3dmark11.

3dmark firestrike extreme scores for win7 and win10 were the same within margin of error, 344.11 drivers for both, and my 24/7 settings 4970k at 4.8, gtx titan core 1162.
[http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/4270178 win7, 4.8ghz 4790k, 1162 titan core = 5372 score
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/4270674 win10 4.8ghz 4790k, 1162 titan core = 5396 score

However, I got same issue in 3dmark 11, 300 points less with windows 10....? windows 10 not optimized with older direct x 9, etc graphics, also based on same issue in pcmark8.
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/8799281 win7, 4.8ghz 4790k, 1162 titan core = 15399 score
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/8799324 win10 4.8ghz 4790k, 1162 titan core = 15081 score

In PCmark8 with both, most tests showed very similar performance between 7 and 10, 10 very slightly faster in some things though probably just error of repeatability, but web browsing and direct x 9 graphics caused overall score for win 10 to be lower.

Have to just wait until 10 matures more to test, but looks like they need to optimize 10 with older direct x drivers/graphics.