Comparisons of some AMD Microarchitectures

[qcmadness]

http://hk-spot.com/review/amd-arch/AMD-Arch.html

Hope you will like this.

[FlanK3r]

yes, not bad, Do you will upadte this review with next CPUs?

[qcmadness]

yes, not bad, Do you will upadte this review with next CPUs?

I think I will give another review for the Bulldozer Family.

[justapost]

Interesting comparison, we still use a few 4850e's and 505e's at work. I did expect an better ipc on jaguar in comparison to athlon64. Seems under linux jaguar performs better because most of the benchmarks made use of newer instruction sets.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...enom_am1&num=4

[tbone8ty]

Opteron 165 vs. Kabini 5350

Which is faster?

[qcmadness]

Opteron 165 vs. Kabini 5350

Which is faster?

Athlon 5050e > Opterion 165

[FlanK3r]

5350 is beast, it win average against A4 Trinity APUs

[imamage]

I am glad of my 5350 purchase , it works nice as a HTPC for my living room.

[BeepBeep2]

5350 is beast, it win average against A4 Trinity APUs

This fact alone makes AMD look ridiculously stupid. The 5350 CPU part is as fast as AMD's Richland mobile A8 and A10 APUs.

Whatever team designed the Jaguar core, they deserve awards.
A 32nm Bulldozer module (containing 2 cores) was 30.9mm^2, while a Jaguar core on 28nm process is only 3.1mm^2.
You can probably fit six Jaguar cores inside a Steamroller module...
All while Steamroller is no faster than Jaguar sub 45w TDP

Imagine a large-design Jaguar core with 4MB L2, and dual channel memory? Clock per clock, it would probably be close to matching Steamroller in some applications.

[[XC] Lead Head]

Beema and Mullins bring the Jaguar family IPC even higher with dramatically lower power consumption. IPC of them is better than Steamroller as far as I know.