# Thread: CPU voltage regulation MOSFET replacement

1. ## CPU voltage regulation MOSFET replacement

So here's my motherboard's CPU voltage regulation schematic:

Now that looks like a decent 3-phase setup, but unfortunately those nice FETs are not the ones that made it to production. Instead all FETs are much weaker mdu1516 FETs, and half of the high-side FETs were removed.

mdu1516: 14 mOhm resistance when Vgs = 4.5V
mdu2654: 4.5 mOhm resistance when Vgs = 4.5V
mdu2657: 11.3mOhm resistance when Vgs = 4.5V

Now these resistance values are rough estimates since this is a MOSFET and not a resistor, but since all that differs between these transistors is likely width/length ratios, it's safe to say that the production high side is 2.48 times as resistive as planned, and the low side is 3.11 times as resistive. If we take the worst case scenario of 14 mOhm resistance, then pulling 81W at 1.371V (what I need for 4.4ghz) is the following:

I = V / R
I = 81W / 1.371V
I = 59A total
I = 19.7A per phase

P = I^2 * R
P = 19.7A^2 * 14mOhm
P = 5.43W per phase
P = 16.3W total due to high-side power FETs alone!

This is a ridiculous amount of power draw just from power FETs. Yes it's a worst case scenario, but it shows that power losses in the voltage regulation is extremely high. Adding in the inductors could make this well over 20W. Using the planned high side power FETs is a much more reasonable 6.56W worst case scenario, thus I am looking into removing the current FETs and putting the planned FETs in. I have some questions though:

1. Does any other component need to be changed to accommodate the new FETs?

2. Currently turbo turns off when the CPU is drawing high amounts of power at normal room temps with the CPU in the mid 80s. It takes several minutes of high power draw before this occurs. It will turn back on after a few seconds, then off again a few seconds later with this cycle repeating indefinitely. This does not happen in a cold environment, or if a screw up die contact so that the CPU runs hotter and can hit TJmax. My thinking is that a motherboard component is triggering an overheat signal, cutting power draw by disabling turbo to save the motherboard. The only component close to the FETs with a heat sensor are the MOSFET gate drivers. By putting in bigger FETs, will I be putting more strain on the gate driver and exacerbate this issue?

3. To simplify purchasing can I buy matching high-side and low-side FETs? I was thinking of getting all mdu2654 or all mdu1512 FETs for both high side and low side.

4. Does anyone have an mdu2654 datasheet? I'm mainly interested in the gate capacitance. I found current ratings from a screenshot, but the picture lacked the capacitance numbers. I am concerned with overloading the gate driver.

5. The FETs are far enough away from the CPU socket that I can shield the socket from my heat gun when replacing the FETs. The same cannot be said for the inductors. Downsizing the inductors and adding caps to spread out the increased ripple current can also significantly reduce voltage regulation power draw, and improve output voltage stability in the process. My thinking is that this may melt the CPU socket, but it might not since the socket was likely put on in the first place using a oven hot enough to melt lead-free solder, so maybe the socket can take the heat. Is replacing the inductors a possibility, or is melting the socket too likely?

I only checked the MOSFET part numbers and not the gate driver parts. It is possible that they also cut back on the gate drivers, but for now I am assuming that they did not.

Oh and some system info:

Clevo P150EM with HEAVILY modified cooling (better than m18x cooling)
mediocre 3920xm. Power limits and current limits are set over 200.
4.2ghz in P95 tops out at 81C, 76W power draw. No throttling. 1.291V VID
4.3ghz in P95 tops out at 86C, 81W power draw. Turbo turns off for 3 seconds roughly every few minutes. 1.321V VID. Non-turbo CPU speed is 3.1ghz.
4.4ghz in P95 tops out at 88C, 89W power draw. Turbo turns off for 3 seconds roughly every 20 seconds. 1.371V VID. Non-turbo CPU speed is 3.1ghz.
4.5ghz in P95 throttles terribly and would probably hit 100C if it did not.

The voltage regulation cooling is tied to the CPU cooling. Reducing voltage regulation draw should also reduce CPU temps slightly, hopefully keeping the CPU temp under 90C at 4.4ghz. Note that laptops only have around 60% of the VCC and GND pins as a desktop and have no load-line compensation, thus vdroop is immense and the CPU never sees anywhere near the VID input.

I have run a 2920xm sandy bridge in the system in the past and pulled 105W for a short burst. I have pulled mid 90s on the ivy bridge. BIOS power limits do not seem to be an issue. Again this seems motherboard overheating based.

If anyone has any input I would really appreciate it. Even if you aren't sure but have your own story of something you did I would really like to hear it. Or if you see something I could do to improve the CPU overclock please let me know that too. I also have the CPU VRM schematic if that would be helpful.

2. Most newer mobo VRM circuits have an overheat sensor built in that cuts the vcore and CPU frequency as a result, when the component temp exceeds a specified temp, typically 90C. Many of the AM3+ socket mobos have VRM designs that simply can not handle the 8-core FX CPU power requirements as they constantly overheat and cycle back and forth.

3. Originally Posted by AMDforME
Most newer mobo VRM circuits have an overheat sensor built in that cuts the vcore and CPU frequency as a result, when the component temp exceeds a specified temp, typically 90C. Many of the AM3+ socket mobos have VRM designs that simply can not handle the 8-core FX CPU power requirements as they constantly overheat and cycle back and forth.
I don't think it's the VRM itself since if I neglect the FET cooling the turbo cycling happens at much lower power draw. Also I added a copper plate onto the VRM that the CPU air intake sucks air in over and there was no improvement.

I can look into it more though. Maybe I missed contact with VRM and the plate is just sitting there. I really doubt it is the VRM though since it does have separate gate driver chips, so it shouldn't heat up with higher load.

4. So the current plan is to just use MDU1512 chips across the board. Maybe put MDU1511 chips in for the pull-down.

Anyone like the LN2 guys who modify voltage regulation circuits have any input on this?