Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 45 of 45

Thread: XS Test4Theory

  1. #26
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    kingston.ma
    Posts
    2,139
    Quote Originally Posted by Snow Crash View Post
    ... to step around the core limitation of Test4Theory limitation ...
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...pp_info-method
    I use the linked process on my i7-980X to run 3 instances of T4T, let me know what pieces of it are tripping things up on you and I'll see if I can figure out what I did to make it work

  2. #27
    HWiNFO Author
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    /dev/null
    Posts
    801
    Hmmm.. maybe I should switch my 32-thread dual-Xeon machine to run Test4Theory tasks on all cores ?

  3. #28
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    1,285
    Quote Originally Posted by Mumak View Post
    Hmmm.. maybe I should switch my 32-thread dual-Xeon machine to run Test4Theory tasks on all cores ?
    yes, yes i think you should.....
    Its not overkill if it works.


  4. #29
    HWiNFO Author
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    /dev/null
    Posts
    801
    but then you'd loose your #1 place

  5. #30
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    1,285
    haha, nice try... but ive got like 50 more cores i could throw at it

    Stats are in.......11,081 for the day

    but it looks like we need to get a bit more poduction, we dropped down to 3rd in the dailies


    Last edited by skycrane; 04-15-2014 at 09:59 AM.
    Its not overkill if it works.


  6. #31
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    kingston.ma
    Posts
    2,139
    Quote Originally Posted by skycrane View Post
    Stats are in.......11,081 for the day
    but it looks like we need to get a bit more production, we dropped down to 3rd in the dailies
    yes boss, added 1 more
    good days back to back, we set anther team record 13,175
    AND ... we broke 1 MILLION total project point!!!
    Last edited by Snow Crash; 04-16-2014 at 02:27 PM.

  7. #32
    HWiNFO Author
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    /dev/null
    Posts
    801
    Based on RAC, XS is now #3 ! Not bad for a team of 4 active crunchers only Congrats !
    and happy Easter !

  8. #33
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    kingston.ma
    Posts
    2,139
    Quote Originally Posted by Mumak View Post
    Has anybody maybe experienced disk corruption?
    Since I stated with T4T, on two of my machines various projects begun to fail. I found that this was due to a disk corruption inside the BOINC data folders.
    I have a feeling that this might be related to VirtualBox...
    Just noticing this the last few days ... while only observational, it appears the more boinc instances I run the more virtual disk corruption takes place ... I was trying to add a new core every few days but I'm going to back down a little ... kills me but I lost about 48 hours between multiple instance over the last 2 days.

  9. #34
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    1,285
    back up to #2 in the dailies, and a pb of 7122 for me today

    congrats to everyone that is putting up the points. im hoping to add a few more this week.
    Its not overkill if it works.


  10. #35
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    1,285


    hehe, well ive added a few more the last 2 days we were over 20k, but dropped down to only 17k today

    i found a down and dirty easy way to add a new comps... it takes about 2 minutes per core, and thats with typing everything in...

    let me know if yall need it. im going to have it run on every core ive got. and see if i can get the #1 spot in the project dalies
    Its not overkill if it works.


  11. #36
    HWiNFO Author
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    /dev/null
    Posts
    801

  12. #37
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    1,285
    <cc_config>
    <log_flags>
    </log_flags>
    <options>
    <ncpus>1</ncpus>
    </options>
    <options>
    <data_dir>c:\programdata\boinc1</data_dir>
    </options>
    </cc_config>

    "C:\Program Files\BOINC\boinc.exe" --allow_multiple_clients --dir c:\programdata\boinc1\ --gui_rpc_port 31417

    no, just a concised way to run the switches. just increase the \boinc1 by one for each core, and the port 31417 as well
    Its not overkill if it works.


  13. #38
    Xtreme crazy bastid
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    On mah murder-sickle!
    Posts
    5,878
    You guys looked lonely so I figured I throw you a core.

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  14. #39
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    1,285
    Thanks for joining in the fun of smashing atoms

    wooohooo, top 100 for me, and the team is doing nicely climbing up in the ranks.. were at 37 now, so everyone turn it up a bit, throw some more cores on it, bring your friends, and lets have some fun
    Its not overkill if it works.


  15. #40
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    1,285
    <app_config>
    <app>
    <name>vboxwrapper</name>
    <max_concurrent>1</max_concurrent>
    </app>
    <app_version>
    <app_name>vboxwrapper</app_name>
    <plan_class>vbox64</plan_class>
    <avg_ncpus>1.5</avg_ncpus>
    </app_version>
    </app_config>


    ive also found this app_config that some ppl are making use of using 2 cores for the VM... not sure how it works. but im going to try it
    Its not overkill if it works.


  16. #41
    HWiNFO Author
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    /dev/null
    Posts
    801
    I'll try that too. Wondering if the credit granted is then doubled too...
    Last edited by Mumak; 05-19-2014 at 10:25 AM.

  17. #42
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    kingston.ma
    Posts
    2,139
    I'm back for a while ... at least until I hit 250 K ... I've been bouncing around a bit lately but have got back on the CERN bandwagon ... Test4Theory, LHC classic sixtrack, and now the new ATLAS project

  18. #43
    HWiNFO Author
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    /dev/null
    Posts
    801
    AFAIK, Atlas is in beta stage yet and Atlas tasks will be run at vLHC@Home (ex-Test4Theory) soon.

  19. #44
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    1,285
    In case yall havent realized it yet, they FINALLY have vLHC running 2 cores max now. i still havent figured out why they wont let more than that run on a comp.... let us worry about how much hardware we need to run it. your job is to write the program to run on every core...

    end rant...

    also, vLHC, and atlas will NOT run on the same comp. they fight each other for access to VBox
    Its not overkill if it works.


  20. #45
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    kingston.ma
    Posts
    2,139
    Quote Originally Posted by skycrane View Post
    ... also, vLHC, and atlas will NOT run on the same comp. they fight each other for access to VBox
    I *think* some of the contention comes when multiple apps are trying to write snapshots at the same time, it simply takes too long for the HDD to write and you end up with the VM for one of the apps thinking the source system can not service it (which it can't) and then it magically shuts itself down for 24 hours (ugh).
    On a 4670K w / core 4.1, nb 3.9, RAM 2133, OS Win7 on SSD ... I had no issues with running 1x vLHC and 1x ATLAS.
    When WCG challenge is over I'll be back and see how far we can push the concurrency.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •