Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 32 of 32

Thread: Techspot does BattleField 4 CPU and GPU Comparison

  1. #26
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,972
    Its really hard to test on multiplayer anyway.. its needed to mix the results between reviews: You can choose different maps, location, different settings and the result will be different..
    CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
    GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
    Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
    RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
    Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0

  2. #27
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    'Zona
    Posts
    2,346
    Quote Originally Posted by blindbox View Post
    EDIT: Also, notice the graphics quality seems to affect who's the winner. Drawing the above conclusions based on the highest settings they benched at.

    EDIT2: Checked, and checked again. See the difference in settings between these two.

    http://www.sweclockers.com/artikel/1...d-4/3#pagehead
    http://pclab.pl/art55318-4.html

    sweclockers had r9 290x ahead of GTX 780 by a little bit at 1920x1080 ultra 4x MSAA
    pclab.pl had r9 290x a little bit behind gtx 780 at 1920x1080 ultra (no msaa probably, lower slides indicate they'd tell if 4x MSAA is enabled)

    Pclab.pl does not have any 2560x1440/1600 results.
    sweclockers showed r9 290x beating titan at 2560x1440 ultra 4x msaa

    I think both sites are correct.
    But in other instances, 290x massively outperforms GTX780, possibly even Titan(can't remember atm), without AA in BF4.
    Originally Posted by motown_steve
    Every genocide that was committed during the 20th century has been preceded by the disarmament of the target population. Once the government outlaws your guns your life becomes a luxury afforded to you by the state. You become a tool to benefit the state. Should you cease to benefit the state or even worse become an annoyance or even a hindrance to the state then your life becomes more trouble than it is worth.

    Once the government outlaws your guns your life is forfeit. You're already dead, it's just a question of when they are going to get around to you.

  3. #28
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Ankara Turkey
    Posts
    2,631
    Quote Originally Posted by blindbox View Post
    Hope you checked my above edit. I got the habit of jumping the gun, only to re-edit it later after finding out more. Do we question why 1080p + MSAA or 1440p/1440p + MSAA are not benched in pclab.pl? You're right though, need more benches.
    oh i didn't see it but my comment was not about what you wrote.. the joke part was but not the serious part . problem is i can't find the logic behind this and curious about it. i can think of 3 possibilities but all seem to have little possibilities. but what Sherlock Holmes said '...when you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.'


    When i'm being paid i always do my job through.

  4. #29
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    163
    Quote Originally Posted by LordEC911 View Post
    But in other instances, 290x massively outperforms GTX780, possibly even Titan(can't remember atm), without AA in BF4.

    In single player campaign, not in multiplayer. At least I didn't see it in multiplayer anywhere.
    Asus Z87 Deluxe, 4770K,Noctua NH-D14, Crucial 16 GB DDR3-1600, Geforce Titan, ASUS DRW-24B3ST, Crucial M500 960GB, Crucial M4 256GB, 3 X Seagate 4TB, Lamptron FC5 V2 Fancontroller, Noctua Casefans, Antec P183 Black, Asus Essence STX, Corsair AX860i, Corsair SP2500 speakers, Logitech Illuminated Keyboard, Win7 Home Pro 64 bit + Win 8.1 Home 64 bit Dual boot, ASUS VG278H

  5. #30
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,972
    Quote Originally Posted by nossy23 View Post
    In single player campaign, not in multiplayer. At least I didn't see it in multiplayer anywhere.
    Just follow the link on the previous page ( sweclockers ). ( the problem is "without AA " they too use only the medium setting ).
    Last edited by Lanek; 10-31-2013 at 12:55 PM.
    CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
    GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
    Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
    RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
    Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0

  6. #31
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    163
    Someone should compare benches between Win7 and Win8.
    Asus Z87 Deluxe, 4770K,Noctua NH-D14, Crucial 16 GB DDR3-1600, Geforce Titan, ASUS DRW-24B3ST, Crucial M500 960GB, Crucial M4 256GB, 3 X Seagate 4TB, Lamptron FC5 V2 Fancontroller, Noctua Casefans, Antec P183 Black, Asus Essence STX, Corsair AX860i, Corsair SP2500 speakers, Logitech Illuminated Keyboard, Win7 Home Pro 64 bit + Win 8.1 Home 64 bit Dual boot, ASUS VG278H

  7. #32
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,692
    Quote Originally Posted by filmbot View Post
    Just curious, why would minimum frame rates need to be included? Trying to come up with a reason but just can't at the moment.
    If you upgrade the CPU generally speaking minimum framerates go up across the board, max and avg. you don't see the same increase, most of the time the same fps. Bit-tech CPU reviews get it right.

    Intel Core i7-3770K
    ASUS P8Z77-I DELUXE
    EVGA GTX 970 SC
    Corsair 16GB (2x8GB) Vengeance LP 1600
    Corsair H80
    120GB Samsung 840 EVO, 500GB WD Scorpio Blue, 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3
    Corsair RM650
    Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced
    OC: 5Ghz | +0.185 offset : 1.352v

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •