Last edited by boxleitnerb; 10-25-2013 at 11:42 PM.
Thanks to Oj101 for bringing some newz on it !
Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!
Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v
Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!
Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v
Oj101 - i dont know, where you get that numbers, but i am not sure it is correct. 10 percents above R9 290X on stock clocks? - We will see.
Look at these results, Ti sample here is 6GB card with more CUDAs than today GTX 780. But i don t know if it has final clocks and final SKU configuration.
PS. Reviews are closer then all expected
PS2. I have some another shots made with this secret card
Last edited by PedantOne; 10-26-2013 at 01:41 AM.
Thx!
give me more shotsI have some another shots made with this secret card
WOOOOOF
I wonder how much NVIDIA will sell this, knowing them they will most likely will sell this at a high price and won't try to sell it close to the R9 290X price because they are afraid of losing money. Though I wonder if the GTX 780 Ti will come with 6GB RAM or not if its meant to be faster than both the Titan and R9 290X.
AMD Threadripper 12 core 1920x CPU OC at 4Ghz | ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme X399 motherboard | 32GB G.Skill Trident RGB 3200Mhz DDR4 RAM | Gigabyte 11GB GTX 1080 Ti Aorus Xtreme GPU | SilverStone Strider Platinum 1000W Power Supply | Crucial 1050GB MX300 SSD | 4TB Western Digital HDD | 60" Samsung JU7000 4K UHD TV at 3840x2160
i think price can be around $650 but who know now.
i'd say they drop the 780 to $550-600, introduce the 780ti at $650-700 and EOL the Titan.
Ryzen 9 3900X w/ NH-U14s on MSI X570 Unify
32 GB Patriot Viper Steel 3733 CL14 (1.51v)
RX 5700 XT w/ 2x 120mm fan mod (2 GHz)
Tons of NVMe & SATA SSDs
LG 27GL850 + Asus MG279Q
Meshify C white
I think they'd have to price the 780 at least at $500, if not lower to be honest. Yes power consumption and heat are factors, but in the end most people only care about performance. Most reviews I've seen show it being around 10% slower than the 290X in uber mode, so $500 would be a good point to undercut AMD.
Eitherway I'm just happy that we have real competition at the top end again. Better prices and performance for everyone!
Titan was EOLed long time ago
This is reasonable, nVidia brand still carries more weight compared to AMD graphic, though i am more leaning that GTX 780 would be closer to the lower number (US$ 550) thus matching reference R9 290X price (yes it's a bit slower but it has its own good qualities), while GTX 780 Ti would go higher, the upper limit at US$ 700, factoring its top of the class performance and perhaps 6 GB high speed VRAM, not to mention higher CUDA count GK110 chips are more rare, so it needs to be priced accordingly to ensure good supply & optimum profitability.
Last edited by spursindonesia; 10-26-2013 at 04:30 PM.
Rig:
Intel Core 2 Quad 9400 @4.0 GHz watercooled
AMD Radeon HD 5850 @950 MHz
4 GB Adata Vitesta
DFI LanParty X38
Creative XFi
2 WDC black 640 GB RAID 0, 2 WDC caviar 1.5 GB
Silverstone 700 w
Thermaltake Kandalf
24" Samsung LCD TV full HD
I said they are willing to sell at a loss, sure there is a lot of head room now, but right now Nvidia have to protect their market share, it would be stupid to allow AMD to gain more share with a card supporting an API nvidia can't use. Every AMD sale with GCN in it is a point gain for developers to consider implementing Mantle.
If Nvidia isn't going to be able to join the Mantle party, and developers are resistant to them building a real rival API their only choice is to kill this API before it gets off the ground, they should consider GCN a virus. If Mantle gains are small then it's not an issue, but if Mantle gains are large every sale Nvidia make before December and the BF4 Mantle patch is very important. So yes, I think Nvidia are willing to sell at a loss to protect market share because, depending on Mantle's performance, they won't be able to bring it back if the lose it.
Lol you gotta be kidding me!!!
Read more:http://wccftech.com/alleged-nvidia-g...#ixzz2isZ4yuKnA forum member on XtremeSystems posted an alleged 3DMark 11 score which he claims is the performance of the reference GeForce GTX 780 Ti graphic card. From the screenshots, it can be clearly seen that the GeForce GTX 780 Ti ends up as a faster solution than the GeForce GTX Titan and the Radeon R9 290X. The performance may be faster in synthetic benchmarks but gaming results are a whole different story so we have to wait to see the final performance results of the card when the card launches next month.Furthermore, the sample received by the user isn?t exactly a retail sample but an engineering board with 6 GB VRAM and an increased core count compared to the GeForce GTX 780 (2304 Cores). The user didn't pointed out the exact number but we will get to know them in the upcoming weeks. Usually, suchboard samples end up with lower clock speeds than the retail models so one can expect even better performance in the final models. You can see the performance results below
It stinks a bit when NVidia know they are going to release a secret revision (780Ti) that makes all other cards they happily took a lot of money for worthless. Thanks.
Bencher/Gamer(1) 4930K - Asus R4E - 2x R9 290x - G.skill Pi 2200c7 or Team 2400LV 4x4GB - EK Supreme HF - SR1-420 - Qnix 2560x1440
Netbox AMD 5600K - Gigabyte mitx - Aten DVI/USB/120Hz KVM
PB 1xTitan=16453(3D11), 1xGTX680=13343(3D11), 1x GTX580=8733(3D11)38000(3D06) 1x7970=12059(3D11)40000(vantage)395k(AM3) Folding for team 24
AUSTRALIAN DRAG RACING http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFsbfEIy3Yw
This type of card never sell well anyway.. but you know Nvidia, if they can sold, AMD is not faster, they hope peoples will buy the cheaper cards thinking it is better.
You was really think this site have any source ? They do like us.. they watch forums, discussion and they do their article based on that.
Last edited by Lanek; 10-26-2013 at 06:49 PM.
CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0
My guess is that NVidia doesn't want to permit access to the un-neutered compute abilities of Titan at that much lower price point. AMD, on the other hand, has not restricted the compute performance of its cards. The fact that AMD is giving their compute performance away for much less than NVidia is the thing that hurts NVidia the most by eroding market share in their most valuable categories...and increases the likelihood that CUDA will lose traction in the market.
Server: HP Proliant ML370 G6, 2x Xeon X5690, 144GB ECC Registered, 8x OCZ Vertex 3 MAX IOPS 240GB on LSi 9265-8i (RAID 0), 12x Seagate Constellation ES.2 3TB SAS on LSi 9280-24i4e (RAID 6) and dual 1200W redundant power supplies.
Gamer: Intel Core i7 6950X@4.2GHz, Rampage Edition 10, 128GB (8x16GB) Corsair Dominator Platinum 2800MHz, 2x NVidia Titan X (Pascal), Corsair H110i, Vengeance C70 w/Corsair AX1500i, Intel P3700 2TB (boot), Samsung SM961 1TB (Games), 2x Samsung PM1725 6.4TB (11.64TB usable) Windows Software RAID 0 (local storage).
Beater: Xeon E5-1680 V3, NCase M1, ASRock X99-iTX/ac, 2x32GB Crucial 2400MHz RDIMMs, eVGA Titan X (Maxwell), Samsung 950 Pro 512GB, Corsair SF600, Asetek 92mm AIO water cooler.
Server/workstation: 2x Xeon E5-2687W V2, Asus Z9PE-D8, 256GB 1866MHz Samsung LRDIMMs (8x32GB), eVGA Titan X (Maxwell), 2x Intel S3610 1.6TB SSD, Corsair AX1500i, Chenbro SR10769, Intel P3700 2TB.
Thanks for the help (or lack thereof) in resolving my P3700 issue, FUGGER...
Hawaii have restricted DP performance m8 ( by software it means only ) ... 1/8 vs 1/4 on the 7970.. ofc they are still a good number upper the Nvidia Gefore card ( with 1/24 this was not hard ).... Its not reduced at te same point, but they follow the same course. Well this can change really hard ( reviews are not clear on it, some say 1/4 other 1/8 )
Last edited by Lanek; 10-26-2013 at 06:56 PM.
CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0
They semi neutered the compute ability of this card or they changed the specs of the double precision unit.
I believe the double precision which was previously 1/4 with the 7970 is now 1/8 which is still better than how neutered the gtx 780 is at 1/24.
I wonder if they are going to even bother with a professional chip for this card. Usually pro chip come out quite a bit later and by them 20nm will be in talks.
Also, I wonder if it is possible to put this chip into the new Mac Pros. This is really where it can hurt AMD having a high TDP. The Mac Pros are a lot more limited for cooling capacity in general and having this chip thermally regulated might turns its performance into tahiti by lowering the clocks.
Plus having the heatsink shared by the CPU, and I have seen with some xenon e5 which are in the mac pro, have a max operating temperature of 81 degrees. Thus, having something that regularly wants to run at 95 degree's is going to increase the temperature of CPU beyond that capacity since its a shared heatsink, particularly if the singular heatsink is overwhelmed.
Last edited by tajoh111; 10-26-2013 at 07:18 PM.
Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
6gb OCZ platinum
4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
2*640 WD Blacks
750GB Seagate.
I doubt you'll see the 290 or 290x in a mac pro.
All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.
Last edited by PedantOne; 10-26-2013 at 10:20 PM.
If in doubt about the CPU, one can just look at the GPU subscore. That is unaffected by the processor.
Bookmarks