Some EUROPEAN PRICES
I heard Nda lifts at 15th
I like large posteriors and I cannot prevaricate
So when are we likely to get the first reviews for this card.
Evantaur - NOT, it is not
MaddMuppet - in few weeks!
maybe torrorrow?!?!?
この世界には 人の運命を司る 何らかの超越的な 〝律〝...... 〝神の手〝が 存在するのだろうか? 少なくとも 人は 自らの意志さえ 自由にはできな
Delay Release R9 290 X - R9 290, Just Waiting Nvidia Release GTX 770 TI Gap Filler Between GTX 770 And GTX 780.
PERSIAN GULF
There is not any GTX 770 Ti, it is only rumor
Well I just gave in to the price cuts on the EOL 7970's. Just bought an Asus 7970 Matrix Platinum 3Gb for an impossible to resist 220 UK pounds. Which is an amazing price, and 3 free games thrown in too.
Especially when you consider that the R9 280X Matrix Platinum, which is the same damn card, is listed on the same site @ 330, and no game bundle.
So I used the cash I saved to buy an extra 8Gb of RAM
Need to change my sig now lol.
Desktop :-AMD Ryzen 1800X | ASUS Crosshair VI Hero | 16Gb Corsair LPX | Asus Strix Fury | Corsair MP500 480Gb (OS/Apps), Samsung 850 Evo 1Tb (Steam), WD Caviar Green 2Tb (Data) | Lian Li PC-09 WRX | Superflower Leadex Platinum 1600W | Win 10 Pro x64
Notebook :-Alienware M17x R4 | Intel i7 3630QM | 8Gb DDR3 | AMD Radeon HD 7970M 2Gb | Crucial M4 512Gb | Win 7 Pro
Media PC :- AMD Sempron LE 1300 | Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-SH2 | 780G chipset/Radeon HD3200 | 2Gb OCZ PC2-6400 | Crucial V4 128Gb | LG GGC-H20L | Win 7 Pro
Storage :- Windows Home Server 2011 | Chenbro ES34069 | Intel DH67CF | Pentium G620 | 4Gb Corsair Vengence LP DDR3 | Sandisk Ultra 120 Gb SSD (OS) | Highpoint RocketRAID 640 + 4 WD Caviar Red 2Tb RAID 5 (Data)
Cool bro. Thanks for letting me know bro. Keep your chin up bro.
They could have released 7990 at that time but didn't want to cannibalize their partner's cards.
How many +$500 consumer cards do you think are sold in a quarter?
How is GTX780 a better value at $650 than GTX680 at $500?
Who was the first to say that Titan wasn't a limited run?
Who was the first to say that we should expect a cutdown Titan as a GeForce card about two months after Titan's launch?
Hawaii's launch is closer to GTX780, which is the only consumer GK110 on the market, than Maxwell is to Hawaii.
I'm sorry but I will repeat, you don't sit on inventory that could potentially become worth next to nothing within 8months.
Mmm... English. WTF is that?
Originally Posted by motown_steve
Every genocide that was committed during the 20th century has been preceded by the disarmament of the target population. Once the government outlaws your guns your life becomes a luxury afforded to you by the state. You become a tool to benefit the state. Should you cease to benefit the state or even worse become an annoyance or even a hindrance to the state then your life becomes more trouble than it is worth.
Once the government outlaws your guns your life is forfeit. You're already dead, it's just a question of when they are going to get around to you.
Sure mate. Nvidia just decided they were making to much money, why bother selling a $999 card earlier, much better sell it later and see AMD gain market share and then undercut it in performance and price just a few months later. It's just a K20x with higher clock? Do you mean more 130mhz, more RAM, faster RAM, wider bus etc...
I guess it's easier to rip off workstation guys, specially if they need dp performance.Just got our supermicro station with a new K20 gpu card. Tried a few benchmarks of our code and NVIDIA sdks and K20 was always 10-40% slower [vs GTX680] depending on the work load..
But the point is, it was ready? Isn't Titan a refresh? Isn't AMD late because Titan is a refresh? You greens need to get you story straight.
4670k 4.6ghz 1.22v watercooled CPU/GPU - Asus Z87-A - 290 1155mhz/1250mhz - Kingston Hyper Blu 8gb -crucial 128gb ssd - EyeFunity 5040x1050 120hz - CM atcs840 - Corsair 750w -sennheiser hd600 headphones - Asus essence stx - G400 and steelseries 6v2 -windows 8 Pro 64bit Best OS used - - 9500p 3dmark11 (one of the 26% that isnt confused on xtreme forums)
I really wish AMD was a bit more forthcoming with information about this launch. A bit disappointing really.
It seems 290X reviews - 10/24/2013 and 290 10/31/2013, but not final dates yet, i think
MSRP of Tesla >>> MSRP of Titan. If you have x number of products and you can sell them at $1000 or $3000, what would YOU do? The choice is obvious one would think.
Remember that Teslas were on back order, there was huge demand. Obviously it's a wise decision to fulfill these high margin orders first albeit to the detriment of us enthusiasts.
And no, K20X has the same amount of memory and the same bus width as Titan. Only clocks differ for obvious reasons: TDP. DP workloads are more power intensive than gaming workloads. At least with dedicated units. That's why Titan clocks lower in DP-mode.
Last edited by boxleitnerb; 10-14-2013 at 01:38 AM.
Cannibalize what sales? Early 7990 sold like garbage and were ultra limited edition in number. Plus partners would have been happy to take a AMD reference design if it was available, slap on their own cooler or sticker and sell it like they have done in the past.
I am pretty sure it was left to the partner initially because AMD didn't want to make a reference design that had sky high power consumption. Look at all the partner cards that were released early and they all had freakishly high power consumption, monstrous coolers(triple slot cooling and water cooling) and were simply inelegant designs. To make a card that really competed on all metrics against the gtx 690 wasn't a possibility without going way over PCI-e spec. They left it up to the partners because partners are willing to do all that and break all the rules of a reference design.
Even the later 7990 which took best of the best tahiti xt chips wasn't the best competitor even those it was released 1 year later. It still consumed significantly more power, has bad overclocking potential and cooling was less than ideal(particularly in xfire).
You would be surprised at how many 500 dollar cards sell. Look at steam statistics the gtx 680 still holds a reasonable high percentage relative to other cards this generation. This figure used to be about 50 % higher in the past when the gtx 680 was still a new cards. When you combine steam statistics and how much revenue Nvidia generates, they are likely selling 100,000's not tens of thousand of these cards. E.g 100,000 * 200-300(partners make up the rest of the profit/cost of card) = 20-30 million which in a 700 million plus quarter isn't that unreasonable.
It should be obvious why the gtx 780 would depress the price of a gtx 680. The gtx 780 is close to 30 percent faster than a gtx 680. For the high end, getting 30 percent more performance for 30% more spending is a bargain. The gtx 670 was only 8 percent faster than a gtx 680 and there was a 100 dollar difference yet the gtx 680 still sold well. Look at what that 150 dollar add on gets you with the gtx 780 if the gtx 680 was still 500, 30% better performance, better overclocking potential, a much nicer reference cooler and the title of flagship and the extra memory.
If Nvidia had released the gtx 780 in late fall, the gtx 680 for sure couldn't sell for 500 anymore. If the gtx 780 had unlimited quantity this wouldn't be a problem, but particularly in fall, releasing a low volume, completely supply limited gtx 780 would have caused more harm than good for Nvidia's overall revenue.
Gtx 680 sales would tank until a major price cut was made. While the gtx 780 would sell out instantly which is meaningless on a product that sells in the 10 of thousands.
It wasn't like the gk110 were stock piling collecting dust. Much of them were being sold to the pro market for much higher amounts.
Nvidia has a 250 dollar price difference between the 770 and the gtx 780 and the gap between these cards is less because the 770 is faster than a 680. This is the type of pricing Nvidia has set in place so the cards don't cannibalize each other.
Last edited by tajoh111; 10-14-2013 at 03:39 AM.
Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
6gb OCZ platinum
4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
2*640 WD Blacks
750GB Seagate.
Titan was late and it was not a refresh, that's what i've been saying all along, you said nothing that proves otherwise. It's just funny that stating facts in a AMD thread with 30 pages of nvidia propaganda is considered bias, when fantasy like Nvidia didn't put Titan for sale earlier because didn't feel like it, or that AMD is late is considered solid and correct information.
Titan is not a refresh, true.
Titan was not late, because for that to happen you would have to have some proof that it was meant to be released earlier. If a company changes their strategy, for example to release GK104 first and GK110 later, this is irrelevant and not enough to claim delays. The only reference points for delays that we have and that ultimately matter are in respect to what the competition does. For example, GF100 was late because it was released 6 months after RV870. But if RV870 had not been released until say April 2010, how would one be able to tell if GF100 was late or not? Late compared to what?? We *need* a reference point.
By the timing set forth by Titans release AMDs response with Hawaii can be considered to be late:
Both companies released their first 28nm-GPUs within about 2-3 months of each other: GK104 and Tahiti
GK110 and Hawaii are the addition to their lineups in the upper segment and they are direct competitors.
Nvidia released GK110 for GeForce 11 months after GK104. AMD will have released Hawaii for Radeon 22 months after Tahiti or 7 months after Titan.
This is simple logic and mathematics. I suggest you find some solid arguments of your own instead of trolling without any.
Last edited by boxleitnerb; 10-14-2013 at 03:24 AM.
this card launch is getting so annoying...no info, rebrand, no games, delays, makes me want to wait for a 780 price cut and go for that...
3570K @ 4.5Ghz | Gigabyte GA-Z77-D3H | 7970 Ghz 1100/6000 | 256GB Samsung 830 SSD (Win 7) | 256GB Samsung 840 Pro SSD (OSX 10.8.3) | 16GB Vengeance 1600 | 24'' Dell U2412M | Corsair Carbide 300R
Bookmarks