Looks like system integrator Maingear will feature this processor on their "shift" platform according to the ad on this site
http://jsksokuhou.com/2013/06/amd-an...-9590-fx-9370/
I wonder if they would have any information on pricing
Looks like system integrator Maingear will feature this processor on their "shift" platform according to the ad on this site
http://jsksokuhou.com/2013/06/amd-an...-9590-fx-9370/
I wonder if they would have any information on pricing
As I said before, I don't know about BD nor PD, so can't comment on that.
What I said is that your comparison of temperatures doesn't make any sense.
Any Opteron s939, or Athlon64, would simple fail at 70?C. In that case, I completely agree that I don't like my CPU temps beyond 60?C. Similar case with Phenom II. Obviously when running -out of spec-.
Try to run any Intel CPU at 55-60?C full load while being overclocked. NOT gonna happen. So I guess you'll run a 3770K at 4000Mhz max. because you don't like to see the sensor hitting more than 60?C....
Main: Windows 10 Core i7 5820K @ 4500Mhz, Corsair H100i, 32GB DDR4-2800, eVGA GTX980 Ti, Kingston SSDNow 240GB, Crucial C300 64GB Cache + WD 1.5TB Green, Asus X99-A/USB3.1
ESXi Server 6.5 Xeon E5 2670, 64GB DDR3-1600, 1TB, Intel DX79SR, 4xIntel 1Gbps
ESXi Server 6.0 Xeon E5 2650L v3, 64GB DDR4-2400, 1TB, Asrock X99 Xtreme4, 4xIntel 1Gbps
FreeNAS 9.10 x64 Xeon X3430 , 32GB DDR3-1600, 3x(3x1TB) WD Blue, Intel S3420GPRX, 4xIntel 1Gbps
My 2600k is running at 66C right now at full load. It is rather warm in the room right now, but I'm sure my radiator needs cleaned again also.
My 955BE would hit near 60C sometimes. Never had stability issues with that.
I prefer to keep under 60C, more like 50C if possible (and cooler the better) but I'm also not going to make my PC louder to do it
The Cardboard Master Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64
Where is this chips official review so we can actually have something to discuss?
FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
OCZ ZX 850w psu
Lian-Li Lancool K62
Samsung 830 128g
2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
Win7 Home 64bit
My Rig
Meet my Venice. Temperature tolerance is higher the lower the Frequency is - sometimes in a impressive way.
The Motherboard had bad caps issues. They got replaced but didn't fixed the issue. I recall hearing of a few Athlons 64 of that era that also were overheating for no reason. I even delidded it. Still didn't figured out what the hell causes it.
Do you needed a Review to know how much faster the Core i7 2700K was over the 2600K? Just raise the multiplier.
I'm pretty sure Tbone... is curious as to the binning process (i.e. how well they overclock, thermal, voltage, etc...), obviously a 5 GHZ Vishera is going to score the same in every bench as every other 5GHZ Vishera.
Custom case laser cut from a 3/16" thick sheet of brushed Aluminum 8"x80" & cold formed into a box then anodized black with 1/2" Poly-carbonate side panels..[.fully modular, all aluminum mounting brackets, HD bays, and mobo tray are removable...down to the bare box
--Asus Maximus V Gene--
--Intel 3770k @4.2 GHz De-lided and I soldered an Arctic Twin Turbo to the Intel.
--MSI R7970 3GB @1150, 1500 cooled with an Arctic Accelero Xtreme--
--G.SKILL Ripjaws @2400 MHz --
--SeaSonic X-1050 Gold--
--128 GB Sandisk UltraPlus is was only $59 new! Seagate 1TB HD--
--Samsung S23A750D 120Hz monitor--
--Razer Tarantula-- keyboard, yes it is like 8 years old!
--Corsair M60 mouse--
--Klipsh Promedia 2.1-- I rock stereo speakers the way they were meant to be rocked
-- 100% Fun ...
Does it ever shock anyone else when your hear someone use Darwin's "survival of the fittest" to justify genocide?
Believe it or not, these are accounted for, too. This factory overclocked Processor had a Thread two months ago, when rumors started to leak about it. The Stilt throwed some numbers about it, here and here. If its the same die, its other properties should be around the same that what you can find in a current FX 83xx that can do 5 GHz on air, so if you have such a sample, you could have a very accurate picture of what you can expect from this one. Basically, there are already out very accurate speculations values. They need to be verified on a retail sample, but for as long as it is the same Vishera we already know, it shouldn't bring surprises.
I suppose that if AMD had at hand a new Vishera revision, there would be errata PDFs somewhere including them. However, they aren't going to roll down a new Revision JUST for boutique models. If that was the case, it would sooner or later scale down to the entire FX range.
A new revision would make some sense though. I mean remember the C2->C3 transition for Phenom II and how much better the chips clocked?
As was said before this could be piledriver 2.0 and AMD are keeping it tight lipped to continue selling the 8320 and 8350 to get rid of them.
we know due to the addition of turbocore 3.0, the processor has been changed. The extent of the tuning is the question. I dont believe these are just cut out of the same silicone as the vishera. I would wager we are looking at specifically designed silicone for this part.
That is exactly what I'm saying. When you hit the maximum frequency of a given architecture with air cooling (3.0Ghz for s939, ~3.7Ghz for the first Phenom II) high temperature becomes a bigger problem. I'm sure they could run at 100?C stock, but heavily overclocked more than 60?C sustained will have stability issues. Anyway, I think I've failed to make my point about comparing temperatures of completely different architectures.
I also try, as AzureSky said, to stay below a given limit. For me, on the 939, and Phenom II era, was below 60?C an below 70?C respectively. Now, with my 2600K, and my 3820, below 80?C. Why? Because I understand they don't measure the temperature the same way. For gods sake, I recall AMD CPUs that reported idle temps below the ambient temp.... I try to maintain a low DELTA, instead of looking at absolute values that doesn't mean anything.
Anyway, this is way off-topic...
Main: Windows 10 Core i7 5820K @ 4500Mhz, Corsair H100i, 32GB DDR4-2800, eVGA GTX980 Ti, Kingston SSDNow 240GB, Crucial C300 64GB Cache + WD 1.5TB Green, Asus X99-A/USB3.1
ESXi Server 6.5 Xeon E5 2670, 64GB DDR3-1600, 1TB, Intel DX79SR, 4xIntel 1Gbps
ESXi Server 6.0 Xeon E5 2650L v3, 64GB DDR4-2400, 1TB, Asrock X99 Xtreme4, 4xIntel 1Gbps
FreeNAS 9.10 x64 Xeon X3430 , 32GB DDR3-1600, 3x(3x1TB) WD Blue, Intel S3420GPRX, 4xIntel 1Gbps
If I had to guess... Id say it comes with its own cooler, although everything I read speaks against it, but everything else I read also quotes prices from pcsuperstore whom I've never even heard of before this.... Anyways Here is a picture from E3 of the 9590 running a demo of Eyefinity at E3
impressiv
If this thing was a new stepping and a new revision. This would be a super bone head move to make it build partner first and make it available to everyone else later. This would mean higher clocked chips are in mass production and available.
AMD needs new products at the mid-range to high end to challenge Intels ASAP. Holding back faster processors doesn't make sense because their older lineup isn't selling, their shrinking CPU revenue and marketshare are a reflection of this.
AMD needs new products ASAP and them holding back faster processors for the mass market would be a dumb move at this point. Their products are in dire need of a refresh, especially after the release of haswell. Haswell is going to kill sales of their high end even further.
Selling thousands of these at a decent profit margins is alot better then selling dozens of these at very high profit margins.
Last edited by tajoh111; 06-20-2013 at 08:09 AM.
Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
6gb OCZ platinum
4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
2*640 WD Blacks
750GB Seagate.
With a TDP of 220w amd has alot of liability on their hands. Consider 80% of the am3 boards out there incapable of running this processor. Amd may feel that the only way to safely bring it to market at first is threw system integrators so they can can specify the system requirements for the processor. They may feel it would be alot more damaging to release a processor retail that nobody can run and at this point only gigabyte has pledged support. This creates an issue that most users would have to purchase a board, and processor right before the launch of a new platform. It's a quandary to me.
Revisions and new stepping typically allow higher clocks while not increasing power consumption. Even a refresh of slightly higher power consumption but 200 mhz higher overall than its current would help AMD right now. New SKU drive sales(hence the need for rebrands) and they are especially needed when competitors release new products.
AMD would be better off refreshing its current lineup with a new revision, then spending its energy on this fx 9590. A fx 8500 with a 4.2ghz clock and a 4.5ghz turbo would do pretty well for 200 dollars. Even if the power consumption was tad higher than fx 8350.
Last edited by tajoh111; 06-20-2013 at 09:55 AM.
Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
6gb OCZ platinum
4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
2*640 WD Blacks
750GB Seagate.
Steamroller will come.
Faster cpu will come.
Amd has to do best they can.
Some people need to stop whine.
Fab doesnt got faster by whining.
Vishera 8320@ 5ghz | Gigabyte UD3 | 8gb TridentX 2400 c10| Powercolor 6850 | Thermalight Silver Arrow (bench Super KAZE 3k) | Samsung 830 128gbx2 Raid 0| Fractal case
Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.
-Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.
Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P. ), Juan J. Guerrero
http://www.computerworld.com/s/artic..._sales_plummet
38% drop in CPU division revenue year over year is a pretty good indication of this. This was well below Intels drop year over year which was 12 percent due to the shrinking market.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...-Share-Numbers
AMD lost 5 percent market share in a year. Which consider the small pie to begin with is pretty huge.
As i said revenue and marketshare are pretty indicative that AMD CPU products are not selling and they need a refresh to jump start sales. Haswell going to send the numbers even lower.
Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
6gb OCZ platinum
4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
2*640 WD Blacks
750GB Seagate.
I still don't understand why anyone cares if AMD sells this at high TDP and high clocks. They have the CPU's sitting there and can get more money out of them so why not? Higher profits for AMD aren't a bad thing on any side of the map. Better processors from AMD normally means better processors from Intel not this 5-7% BS we have had lately. AMD is being smart taking over some other markets name means alot.
there is a reason for the less slumping in sales on intel side.
Servers have a market size. IT's to keep their IT budget will spend as much on the most expensive product , no matter what it is, to keep their jobs existing inside the big corperations and budgets largest as possible. for the next year to be justifyable.
Even thought not necessary every year. but in the years it was necessary it was near impossible to justify w/o doing it each and every year.
A catch 22.
Not as much of that market on the amd side. but all it took was 10 giant coperations doing it on the intel side to create those sales.
MM Duality eZ modded horizon (microres bracket). AMD 8120 4545Mhz 303x15 HTT 2727 1.512v load. 2121Mhz 1.08v idle. (48hour prime95 8k-32768 28GB ram) 32GB GeIL Cosra @ RAM 1212Mhz 8-8-8. 4870x2 800/900 load 200/200 idle. Intel Nic. Sabertooth 990fx . 4x64GB Crucial M4 raid 0 . 128GB Samsung 840 pro. 128GB OCZ Vertex 450. 6x250GB Seagate 7200.10 raid 0 (7+ years still running strong) esata raid across two 4 bay sans digital. Coolit Boreas Water Chiller. CoolerMaster V1000. 3x140MM back. 1x120MMx38MM back. 2x120MMx38MM Front. 6x120MM front. 2x120MM side. silverstone fan filters. 2x120MMx38MM over ram/PWM/VRM , games steam desura origin. 2x2TB WD passport USB 3.0 ($39 hot deal score) 55inch samsung 1080p tv @ 3 feet. $30 month equal payments no int (post xmas deal 2013)
Sales have slumped all around simply due to tablets and smart phones. As long as ARM has their grip on things there, it will continue to do so. A tablet is plenty adequate for mainy users now so desktops and laptops have became less attractive.
Any info when these should be showing up in boutique systems or otherwise?
Feedanator 7.0
CASE:R5|PSU:850G2|CPU:i7 6850K|MB:x99 Ultra|RAM:8x4 2666|GPU:980TI|SSD:BPX256/Evo500|SOUND:2i4/HS8
LCD:XB271HU|OS:Win10|INPUT:G900/K70 |HS/F:H115i
sorry I was wrong, AMD are worthless, those of us who own AMD are really misguided in keeping let alone upgrading such horrible systems, our best bet would be to can the AMD garbage till we can afford to buy an intel/nvidia combo, even if its low end i3 and 550 videocard, it would still be better in every way that matters.
Last edited by AzureSky; 06-23-2013 at 01:40 PM.
AMD FX-8350@4.6(280/2520/2520)| 32gb gskill ares ddr3 1866|
2*sapphire dual-x 7870ghz|16896.8 GB hdd space|
2*hp ZR24w+Gateway FPD1976W(video playback)|Asus Xonar DX|
z5500 5.1 speakers|Windows 7 x64|CoolerMaster Cosmos Medusa
PcPower and Cooling TurboCool 1200watt
http://www.techpowerup.com/186340/gi...ature-set.html
Gigabyte releases updated mobo for FX-9000 series cpus
FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
OCZ ZX 850w psu
Lian-Li Lancool K62
Samsung 830 128g
2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
Win7 Home 64bit
My Rig
Bookmarks