Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Is Raid0 in SSDs a nonsense for the average user?

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Madrid, Spain
    Posts
    169

    Is Raid0 in SSDs a nonsense for the average user?

    Hello fellows.

    I was thinking about either buying 2xSamsung Pro SSD 840 256GB in Raid0 or directly buying the 512GB unit. I have read that the main advantage of raiding is to get extremely lower latencies, but this feature is precisely the one where SSDs shines the most.

    Data loss is not important, as it will only contain OS and programs files.

    Thanks in advance!
    WORKSTATION || TJ10B-W | i7-3930K C2 | 4x8GB DDR3-2400 CL10 | 2xGTX TITAN 6GB SLI | P1000W || 30" 2560x1600@60hz
    HTPC || GD08B | i7-920 D0 | 3x4GB 2000 CL9 | HD5870 1GB | X25-M 80GB | X-750 || 75" 1920x1080@4x200hz
    NOTEBOOK || P170EM | i7-3820QM | 2x8GB DDR3 1600 CL9 | GTX680M 4GB | HyperX 3K 240GB || 17,3" 1920x1080@60hz
    ULTRABOOK || W130EW | i7-3620QM | 2x8GB DDR3 1600 CL9 | HD4000 | HyperX 3K 240GB || 13,3" 1366x768@60hz

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Fullerton, California
    Posts
    278
    I would just get the 512. The pro is insanely fast to begin with, and since all you are doing is o/s and programs on it, no real need.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Madrid, Spain
    Posts
    169
    Thanks! I will go for it then
    WORKSTATION || TJ10B-W | i7-3930K C2 | 4x8GB DDR3-2400 CL10 | 2xGTX TITAN 6GB SLI | P1000W || 30" 2560x1600@60hz
    HTPC || GD08B | i7-920 D0 | 3x4GB 2000 CL9 | HD5870 1GB | X25-M 80GB | X-750 || 75" 1920x1080@4x200hz
    NOTEBOOK || P170EM | i7-3820QM | 2x8GB DDR3 1600 CL9 | GTX680M 4GB | HyperX 3K 240GB || 17,3" 1920x1080@60hz
    ULTRABOOK || W130EW | i7-3620QM | 2x8GB DDR3 1600 CL9 | HD4000 | HyperX 3K 240GB || 13,3" 1366x768@60hz

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    467
    I have done it a few times to get more space in a single volume, but at a lower price.

    512gig drives can be very expensive, but are now coming down in price.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Madrid, Spain
    Posts
    169
    Quote Originally Posted by canthearu View Post
    I have done it a few times to get more space in a single volume, but at a lower price.

    512gig drives can be very expensive, but are now coming down in price.
    Yeah, now in my country, the 512GB model is a bit cheaper than 2x256GB ones.
    WORKSTATION || TJ10B-W | i7-3930K C2 | 4x8GB DDR3-2400 CL10 | 2xGTX TITAN 6GB SLI | P1000W || 30" 2560x1600@60hz
    HTPC || GD08B | i7-920 D0 | 3x4GB 2000 CL9 | HD5870 1GB | X25-M 80GB | X-750 || 75" 1920x1080@4x200hz
    NOTEBOOK || P170EM | i7-3820QM | 2x8GB DDR3 1600 CL9 | GTX680M 4GB | HyperX 3K 240GB || 17,3" 1920x1080@60hz
    ULTRABOOK || W130EW | i7-3620QM | 2x8GB DDR3 1600 CL9 | HD4000 | HyperX 3K 240GB || 13,3" 1366x768@60hz

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •