1.45v, unstable, too hot
http://www.chinadiy.com.cn/html/42/n-9142-3.html
1.45v, unstable, too hot
http://www.chinadiy.com.cn/html/42/n-9142-3.html
Is it worth the upgrade from x58?
**RIG**
-Intel i5 4670K 4.5GHz
-Noctua NH-D14
-AsRock Killerx87
-Gskill 2100 c9
-AMD Radeon HD7970
-CM 690II
100?C!!! 4770k stock Intel burn test
hersounds powered by 121 % overclocking Machine http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=220390 - http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1917405
facebook.com/hersounds
Intel Core i5 4670K @ 4,5 Ghz 24/7 - Galaxy HOF GTX 780 - 8 GB Team Group Xtreem 2666 Cas 11 - 8Gb Avexir Core series 2800 Blue Led - Maximus VI Formula Armor TUF - Corsair Force GT 120 GB SATA 3 - Galaxy Hall of fame 1200 hersounds Limited edition Modular - Antec 620 dual fan mod
Toasty!
EDIT: What kind of cooling were they using?
Last edited by xVeinx; 05-26-2013 at 06:10 PM.
Stock Intel bro.
hersounds powered by 121 % overclocking Machine http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=220390 - http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1917405
facebook.com/hersounds
Intel Core i5 4670K @ 4,5 Ghz 24/7 - Galaxy HOF GTX 780 - 8 GB Team Group Xtreem 2666 Cas 11 - 8Gb Avexir Core series 2800 Blue Led - Maximus VI Formula Armor TUF - Corsair Force GT 120 GB SATA 3 - Galaxy Hall of fame 1200 hersounds Limited edition Modular - Antec 620 dual fan mod
Sandy Bridge & Ivy Bridge were not. I suppose Haswell will depend on the system prices. How much will the 4770K, a Z87 motherboard, and say 4x4GB DDR3 run? And how much impact will it have on AA/AAA title gaming?Originally Posted by killerxp100
My toys:
Asus Sabertooth X58 | Core i7-950 (D0) | CM Hyper 212+ | G.Skill Sniper LV 12GB DDR3-1600 CL9 | GeForce GTX 670-2048MB | OCZ Agility 4 512GB, WD Raptor 150GB x 3 (RAID0), WD Black 1TB x 2 (RAID0) | XFX 650W CAH9 | Lian-Li PC-9F | Win 7 Pro x86-64
Gigabyte EX58-UD3R | Core i7-920 (D0) | Stock HSF | G.Skill Sniper LV 4GB DDR3-1600 CL9 | Radeon HD 2600 Pro 512MB | WD Caviar 80GB IDE, 4TB x 2 (RAID5) | Corsair TX750 | XClio 188AF | Win 7 Pro x86-64
Dell Dimension 8400 | Pentium 4 530 HT (E0) | Stock HSF | 1.5GB DDR2-400 CL3 | GeForce 8800 GT 256MB | WD Caviar 160GB SATA | Stock PSU | (Broken) Stock Case | Win Vista HP x86
Little Dot DAC_I | Little Dot MK IV | Beyerdynamic DT-880 Premium (600 Ω) | TEAC AG-H300 MkIII | Polk Audio Monitor 5 Series 2's
Ahh, no wonder
It would be even more useful if they had measured the temp around the CPU socket (mosfet area and backside of the motherboard).
No different from non-delidded Ivy.
Delidded performance and overclocking figures would be more interesting.
Massive difference in power consumption and heat dump. I would say yes.
You go from 130W CPU (like 250W overclocked) and 30W IOH (not sure about overclocked figures, around 50W?) to less than 50W CPU (and less than 100W overclocked if you don't use the IGP) with built-in IOH. So, from 300W down to 100W.
Last edited by zalbard; 05-27-2013 at 07:14 AM.
Donate to XS forums
197MHz BCLK 4.14GHz, Cinebench R11.5 9pts
http://www.coolaler.com/showthread.p...=1#post3158125
I am also facing a problem with the thermal performance of the chip. I got my hands on a LP heatsink specially designed for HSW but for some reason while benching the temps reach 90+. I am investigating as to why this is occurring i have not OCed the chip at all maybe its a ES thing but whatever it is i need to return the chip and cant risk damage.
Coming Soon
Thanks Olivon
A few retail Haswell results (not mine):
http://www.eoz.lv/attachment.php?att...1&d=1369986837
http://www.eoz.lv/attachment.php?att...2&d=1369987565
http://www.eoz.lv/attachment.php?att...3&d=1369987867
4.33Ghz, 26*1.66
http://www.eoz.lv/attachment.php?att...4&d=1370004570
Could be a a bad sample or maybe a bad bios but max stable around 4.5Ghz@1.425v and it runs very hot, same as Ivy.
Last edited by kiwi; 05-31-2013 at 09:45 PM.
...
Haswell is worst clocker then Ivy Bridge, hotter chip, its pure crap. BCLK straps are disabled by Intel with Locked chips, but unlocked for Unlocked chips!!!! Why?
All in the name of "good enough computing" for the masses and "power efficiency" especially for the mobile platform market. Pretty much dictated and proven by the economic rise and prominence of Apple.
i7-2600k L041C108 4.8ghz 1.32v PLL offVenomous-X Push/Pull http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...postcount=1063
Asus P8P67 Vanilla
Samsung 30nm MV-3V4G3D/US 2x4GB @ 9-10-10-28 1T DDR3 2133 1.6v http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=159320
Diamond HD 7970
WD 600GB Velociraptor
Corsair TX750W
CM 690 II Advanced
Q822A549 E8500 @ 4.5ghz air TRUE@ http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=203762
G.Skill F3-12800CL6D-4GBXH @ 7-10-8-27 1T DDR3 2133 1.6v http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=266839
Hmm might just wait for ivy e then unless 780s benifit on pcie 3 (which I doubt)
Feedanator 7.0
CASE:R5|PSU:850G2|CPU:i7 6850K|MB:x99 Ultra|RAM:8x4 2666|GPU:980TI|SSD:BPX256/Evo500|SOUND:2i4/HS8
LCD:XB271HU|OS:Win10|INPUT:G900/K70 |HS/F:H115i
Not a bad sample, every review I've seen shows that Haswell OCs worse than Ivy.
exactly, my own haswell 4770K is worst ocer then year old 3770K
I fail to see where "tock" is here? Just some minor ipc upgrade and lots of noise about avx2, and that's it. This is the lousiest release since pentium4.
Meh. I was hoping to upgrade to the 4770k but more power consumption and 5% more ipc coupled with no extra frequency headroom leaves me no choice but to pass. Even the iGPU seems slow, i was expecting it to be around 70% faster than ivy's but it seems more like 35%. I hope these benches are wrong but i doubt that.
i7 920@4.34 | Rampage II GENE | 6GB OCZ Reaper 1866 | 8800GT (zzz) | Corsair AX750 | Xonar Essence ST w/ 3x LME49720 | HiFiMAN EF2 Amplifier | Shure SRH840 | EK Supreme HF | Thermochill PA 120.3 | MCP355 | XSPC Reservoir | 3/8" ID Tubing
Phenom 9950BE @ 3400/2000 (CPU/NB) | Gigabyte MA790GP-DS4H | HD4850 | 4GB Corsair DHX @850 | Corsair TX650W | T.R.U.E Push-Pull
E2160 @3.06 | ASUS P5K-Pro | BFG 8800GT | 4GB G.Skill @ 1040 | 600W Tt PP
A64 3000+ @2.87 | DFI-NF4 | 7800 GTX | Patriot 1GB DDR @610 | 550W FSP
I' still impressed with Haswell's design on paper, too bad we have very diminishing returns in legacy software. The iGPU is nice upgrade to HD4000's level but it still fails to come close to 7660D- it's 27% slower on average according to the review @ inpai.
Lol, INPAI is wrong in testing methody. They are used at haswell enhanced turbo profile from motherboard vendor, not Intel turbo :-)....i7-3770k with Intel turbo. So a bit cheat for better Haswell results.
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
lol let's just hold off until decent reviews come out before we go headless chicken mode.
-PB
-Project Sakura-
Intel i7 860 @ 4.0Ghz, Asus Maximus III Formula, 8GB G-Skill Ripjaws X F3 (@ 1600Mhz), 2x GTX 295 Quad SLI
2x 120GB OCZ Vertex 2 RAID 0, OCZ ZX 1000W, NZXT Phantom (Pink), Dell SX2210T Touch Screen, Windows 8.1 Pro
Koolance RP-401X2 1.1 (w/ Swiftech MCP35X), XSPC EX420, XSPC X-Flow 240, DT Sniper, EK-FC 295s (w/ RAM Blocks), Enzotech M3F Mosfet+NB/SB
Aww, I push headless chicken mode button, have no clue how disable.
How you put head back on?
Using winblows 8.1.
Last edited by NEOAethyr; 06-01-2013 at 03:48 AM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks