Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: PAOLA_ARP - good crunchers

  1. #1
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    kingston.ma
    Posts
    2,139

    PAOLA_ARP - good crunchers

    A new series of WUs have been put in the long queue ... PAOLA_ARP - these get good GPU utilization and actually point slightly higher than the NATES!!!

  2. #2
    Linux those diseases
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Planet eta pie
    Posts
    2,930
    and so far no errors

  3. #3
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Iowa, USA
    Posts
    705




    holy carp these are big uploads! glad we live in times where it only takes ~20 minutes to upload >100MB!
    Last edited by werdwerdus; 09-29-2012 at 10:34 PM.
    Main: i7-930 @ 2.8GHz HT on; 1x GIGABYTE GTX 660 Ti OC 100% GPUGrid
    2nd: i7-920 @ 2.66GHz HT off; 1x EVGA GTX 650 Ti SSC 100% GPUGrid
    3rd: i7-3770k @ 3.6GHz HT on, 3 threads GPUGrid CPU; 2x GIGABYTE GTX 660 Ti OC 100% GPUGrid
    Part-time: FX-4100 @ 3.6GHz, 2 threads GPUGrid CPU; 1x EVGA GTX 650 100% GPUGrid

  4. #4
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    kingston.ma
    Posts
    2,139
    My first modem (at home) only did 4.8k, I can't imagine I would be GPUGrid crunching if the upload took longer than the crunching

    Luckily it takes a long crunching time to produce those results so we're not totally screwing our bandwidth. I think there might be a correlation between points and results size ... there really is only 1 app and if it records the same results parameters for all WU types - the bigger the results file, the more work it took to create it.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •