I have a quick question, yeah I know I should of looked but...
Do the apu's even have hyper transport anymore?
What do the 890fx and 990fx use in wattage?
I thought it was around 45w's.
I have a quick question, yeah I know I should of looked but...
Do the apu's even have hyper transport anymore?
What do the 890fx and 990fx use in wattage?
I thought it was around 45w's.
Main Rig:
Processor & Motherboard:AMD Ryzen5 1400 ' Gigabyte B450M-DS3H
Random Access Memory Module:Adata XPG DDR4 3000 MHz 2x8GB
Graphic Card:XFX RX 580 4GB
Power Supply Unit:FSP AURUM 92+ Series PT-650M
Storage Unit:Crucial MX 500 240GB SATA III SSD
Processor Heatsink Fan:AMD Wraith Spire RGB
Chasis:Thermaltake Level 10GTS Black
Thank you haylui,
Results look good over all, for single core results there is an 20% increase in INT and FP performance. Odd thing with multi core the incerase is barely 10%. May be caused by the low memory speed or not yet finished tweaking of the core itself. I'm curious about the power consumption at the same clock in comparison to richland. Guess it can be abit higher on kaveri if their top model comes with an 3.7GHz baseclock at 95W, but that lower clockspeed may as well be an tradeoff to higher GPu clocks.
I was looking at the results of the Kaveri ES in geekbench and was wondering how it fares against Vishera.
This is my setup at the moment:
and these are the results:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekb...aseline=223722
I was mainly interested in single core performance, and in my opinion it does pretty good. Multicore scores are lower, naturally.
Memory score seems too low, on the other hand (any thoughts on this?). My guess is that the chip was tested with basic 1600 mhz ram.
I will retest with my 8350 running at 3.5 ghz and ram at 1600 to see how it fares.
Followup
results:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekb...aseline=243160
On single thread it's a win. On multithread, if we remove AES and Dijkstra out of the picture, the Steamroller CU's fare close or better to the Piledriver CU's (keep in mind the lack of L3 cache).
From the memory point of view i'm not sure what to make of it.
I think if we overclock these to 4.6-4.8 it should result in a faster chip than current visheras at least in single-threaded loads.
Not bad, I say.
Last edited by chinook; 12-01-2013 at 04:53 AM. Reason: new data
FX 8370 * Chrosshair V Formula Z * 16GB Kingston 1866 * Sapphire Fury * Samsung 850 Pro * WD Raptor 74Gb * Seagate 2TB * Seagate 1TB * Corsair 1200i * Corsair 800D
EK Supremacy EVO * EK-FB Crosshair V * EK Coolstream XE 480 + XE 120 * D5 * EK F4-120 * Lamptron FC5 * Masterkleer tubing * EK coolant
Thanks for your test. But I feel sorry that your test makes no sense, because the Kaveri platform is running with single channel memory, and pulling down the result too much. I think you could make more test by running your FX8350 with single channel memory, and activating 4 cores only.
Right, thanks for the heads-up, undone.
I've managed to disable 4 cores (this bios is not friendly when it comes to that) and swapped out one memory module.
Results at 3.5 ghz 1600 mhz single channel
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekb...aseline=243265
3.7 ghz
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekb...aseline=243278
3.9 ghz
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekb...aseline=243287
I could test at higher speed. Maybe kaveri benefits from ram speed more than vishera.
FX 8370 * Chrosshair V Formula Z * 16GB Kingston 1866 * Sapphire Fury * Samsung 850 Pro * WD Raptor 74Gb * Seagate 2TB * Seagate 1TB * Corsair 1200i * Corsair 800D
EK Supremacy EVO * EK-FB Crosshair V * EK Coolstream XE 480 + XE 120 * D5 * EK F4-120 * Lamptron FC5 * Masterkleer tubing * EK coolant
no L3 cache effect this?
we need Richland A10-6800k vs this Amd Bantry system
FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
OCZ ZX 850w psu
Lian-Li Lancool K62
Samsung 830 128g
2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
Win7 Home 64bit
My Rig
Found a nice video of Kaveri BF4 demo:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axyHkKn_e80
1920x1080 @medium 30-40fps vsync off (known numbers up to now)
1600x900 @medium 38-52fps vsync off
1280x720 @medium 55-60fps vsync on
1280x720 @high 30-35fps vsync off
1280x720 @ultra 25-30fps vsync off
That gpu should easily get a 40% OC (720 --> 1Ghz), do the math.
Its possible to reach 1600x900 high @30-35fps with some tweaks+gpu/mem OC
Athlon II X4 620 2.6Ghz @1.1125v | Foxconn A7DA-S (790GX) | 2x2GB OCZ Platinum DDR2 1066
| Gigabyte HD4770 | Seagate 7200.12 3x1TB | Samsung F4 HD204UI 2x2TB | LG H10N | OCZ StealthXStream 500w| Coolermaster Hyper 212+ | Compaq MV740 17"
Stock HSF: 18°C idle / 37°C load (15°C ambient)
Hyper 212+: 16°C idle / 29°C load (15°C ambient)
Why AMD Radeon rumors/leaks "are not always accurate"
Reality check
aaaah yaaah uuultra pleaase try...lol
i feel this igpu could definitely hit 1ghz OC clock. slap a decent cooler on it with some 2400mhz+ memory.
should see some demo leaks pretty soon!
Last edited by tbone8ty; 12-02-2013 at 04:56 PM.
FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
OCZ ZX 850w psu
Lian-Li Lancool K62
Samsung 830 128g
2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
Win7 Home 64bit
My Rig
A couple of slides are now floating around showing 3.7 Ghz clock and 4.0 Ghz Turbo (max), so at stock settings it's looking like it will only be about 5% faster in single threaded applications (give or take depending on the nature of the code). It also is looking like there will only be a 15% increase in framerate (apart from mantle-enabled games). I'm sure that we'll see the following revisions with better clock speed, but the switch to bulk from SOI isn't treating them well this time around. The last thing to see is what sort of power consumption the newer cores have. We may not see a huge drop, but there may be some decrease (especially under load; idle is already quite good).
There may be other explanations, but the point still stands that they aren't hitting the clocks they needed/wanted, and they did with Kabini and Temash. This shouldn't be new territory, so something went wrong, and it may involve the switch. Other suggested explanations are always welcome .
Since I don't think anyone answered you yet, no they do not. Hyper Transport is in the AM3 processors because they are the exact same die as the C32 and G34 Opterons. The hyper transport link is used to connect to the northbridge in the AM3+ boards. Server boards use the links to connect to NB and other CPUs. The APU's do not have a Hyper Transport because they are not meant to ever communicate with other CPUs in another socket and they have built in PCI-E lanes so those are used instead to connect to other chipsets.
Rig 1:
ASUS P8Z77-V
Intel i5 3570K @ 4.75GHz
16GB of Team Xtreme DDR-2666 RAM (11-13-13-35-2T)
Nvidia GTX 670 4GB SLI
Rig 2:
Asus Sabertooth 990FX
AMD FX-8350 @ 5.6GHz
16GB of Mushkin DDR-1866 RAM (8-9-8-26-1T)
AMD 6950 with 6970 bios flash
Yamakasi Catleap 2B overclocked to 120Hz refresh rate
Audio-GD FUN DAC unit w/ AD797BRZ opamps
Sennheiser PC350 headset w/ hero mod
Can anybody tell me what the Opteron "Warsaw" is? http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/dis...rocessors.html
Could that be a new revision of Vishera?
Posted before??
A10-7850K 4.9ghz 547 CB score
http://wccftech.com/amd-kaveri-a1078...mark-surfaced/
Real or fake?
Considering all AMD moves lately
a) We may never see warsaw
b) it probably isnt a new revision, that would require new masks etc, if they were doing that they would probably do steamroller instead.More likely same core`s ,binned ,different setup.
Anyhow, wasnt there supposed to be some kind of kaveri preview this month ?
Intel 5960X@4.2Ghz[Prime stable]@4.5 [XTU stable] 1.24v NB@3.6ghz Asrock X99 Extreme 3 4x8GB Corsair Vengeance@3200 16-17-17
Sapphire nitro+ VEGA 56 Samsung SSD 850 256GB Crucial MX100 512GB HDD:WD10TB WD:8TB Seagate8TB
More bad news.
AMD roadmap for 2015 server wise:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=4Tf0wStiSXc
So, after SR 4 cores there are 4 cored excavators with GPU.
What this essentially means, AMD doesnt want to build any non igpu more than 4 cores dies.If there would be anything bigger planned it would be in servers.AMD always doubled usage of chips from server to dekstop using same masks.
What is more troubling ,is that even jaguar cores vanish in exchange for ARM ones.
It essentially means that from NOW to END of 2015 there will be no bigger CPU from AMD than 4 cores.God dammit.
Intel 5960X@4.2Ghz[Prime stable]@4.5 [XTU stable] 1.24v NB@3.6ghz Asrock X99 Extreme 3 4x8GB Corsair Vengeance@3200 16-17-17
Sapphire nitro+ VEGA 56 Samsung SSD 850 256GB Crucial MX100 512GB HDD:WD10TB WD:8TB Seagate8TB
funny that it's called freedom fabric yet it's bga lol. (seattle cpu)
mobo: strix b350f
gpu: rx580 1366/2000
cpu: ryzen 1700 @ 3.8ghz
ram: 32 gb gskill 2400 @ 3000
psu: coarsair 1kw
hdd's: samsung 500gb ssd 1tb & 3tb hdd
Hey, Toronto APU becomes a SoC! So Kaveri replacement will be new socket again, for DDR4 and SoC?
Also, thanks for that youtube vid vario, very interesting
Last edited by Yeroon; 12-27-2013 at 05:10 PM.
Richland 6790K @ 4.713 Ghz / 2208 NB / 1123 gpu / 2304 Ram [96 Bclk]
F2A85-M Pro, Mushkin Black 2133, iGPU (8760D)
9.7L case (excluding 230mm fan) or 11.6L w/2nd rad fan
I think Yes and No.
Look at information: DDR3/4
This could be as in Phenom II times (Phenoms can DDR2 and DDR3 too). So Excavator in desktop could working with FM2+ and FM3 boards. FM2+ are DDR3 and FM3 could be DDR4 boards?
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
Bookmarks