"The power savings comes from not having to route clocks and signals as far, while the area savings are a result of the computer automated transistor placement/routing and higher density gate/logic libraries. The tradeoff is peak frequency. These heavily automated designs won?t be able to clock as high as the older hand drawn designs. AMD believes the sacrifice is worth it however because in power constrained environments (e.g. a notebook) you won?t hit max frequency regardless, and you?ll instead see a 15 - 30% energy reduction per operation. AMD equates this with the power savings you?d get from a full process node improvement."
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6201/a...r-architecture
Last edited by tbone8ty; 10-31-2013 at 09:51 AM.
FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
OCZ ZX 850w psu
Lian-Li Lancool K62
Samsung 830 128g
2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
Win7 Home 64bit
My Rig
Hi guys!
About the frequency of the GPU, we have to evaluate that a Radeon HD7750 (512SP, 8CU, GCN) generates 920 GFlops @900 MHz (SP). Also, I know that actually Kaveri ESamples generate a similiar amount of GFlops at the same frequency. So Kaveri will have the GPU at 1GHz (or more) to reach the goal of 1050 GFlops (as AMD slides reported one year ago).
seems like it would be worth it for Amd to release a steamroller cpu for all the am3+ users, even with out an updated chipset. potential for the whole user base to upgrade.
but then again i don't seem them doing it without having an updated chipset? hmm i dunno.
i for one would upgrade my aging am3+ mobo with a steamroller FX chip.
FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
OCZ ZX 850w psu
Lian-Li Lancool K62
Samsung 830 128g
2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
Win7 Home 64bit
My Rig
Not sure. They have a lot of older processors/stock floating about and I'm not sure how much income it would produce relative to the costs of production/chipset/etc.. For servers, they'll use the C32/G34 socket, so it isn't simply a matter of repackaging an Opteron as an FX. If they are looking to consolidate lines, now may be the time to do it. I understand the sentiment completely; my only question is whether or not it really benefits AMD in the long run.
HTPC : Ryzen, NH D-15, ASUS Crosshir VI Hero
, 2x8 Team 3000, Asus GTX 980 Strix, Win10 Pro
http://hwbot.org/user/johan45
I just wanna see how a 28nm FX chip performs! Gotta be some power savings!
FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
OCZ ZX 850w psu
Lian-Li Lancool K62
Samsung 830 128g
2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
Win7 Home 64bit
My Rig
Doing a 4 to 3ghz .Hum.
Is AMD doing a "conroe" ? Jeez it would be nice.
Stilt , i know you cant say anything of importance.But is your comment "hammer time" in expectation of kaveris performance ? Wil it Athlonize(K7) the market ? :P
Intel 5960X@4.2Ghz[Prime stable]@4.5 [XTU stable] 1.24v NB@3.6ghz Asrock X99 Extreme 3 4x8GB Corsair Vengeance@3200 16-17-17
Sapphire nitro+ VEGA 56 Samsung SSD 850 256GB Crucial MX100 512GB HDD:WD10TB WD:8TB Seagate8TB
Could be but 1GHz compared to the 800/850 we have in current APU's is quite high.
Maybe a part of the GFlops are comming from the newer GCN architecture?
Could be that they shortened the Pipleline again.
Bulldozer's pipline was quite a bit longer compared to the K10,5 Architecture (Deneb and Thuban cores).
Lower clocks could also help to get more performance per watt. And CPU's for tablets and Laptops are more important then every. The Desktop market is getting smaller and smaller.
Top performance might go down a bit. But if the performance per watt is similar to Intel they can still be winners in the mobile space.
System Specs: -=Game PC=- | -=Lan Box=-
Rig 1:
ASUS P8Z77-V
Intel i5 3570K @ 4.75GHz
16GB of Team Xtreme DDR-2666 RAM (11-13-13-35-2T)
Nvidia GTX 670 4GB SLI
Rig 2:
Asus Sabertooth 990FX
AMD FX-8350 @ 5.6GHz
16GB of Mushkin DDR-1866 RAM (8-9-8-26-1T)
AMD 6950 with 6970 bios flash
Yamakasi Catleap 2B overclocked to 120Hz refresh rate
Audio-GD FUN DAC unit w/ AD797BRZ opamps
Sennheiser PC350 headset w/ hero mod
seems, you have right. IM looking forward for some benchmarks.
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
The model code on ES parts doesn't always specify the clock frequency (usually it does thou).
For example ES Trinity parts with 4500 model number have base frequency of 1900MHz.
Should probably find out by Wednesday
FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
OCZ ZX 850w psu
Lian-Li Lancool K62
Samsung 830 128g
2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
Win7 Home 64bit
My Rig
FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
OCZ ZX 850w psu
Lian-Li Lancool K62
Samsung 830 128g
2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
Win7 Home 64bit
My Rig
New slide.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/20624...n-january.html
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7507/a...p-january-14th
Second of all, we have confirmation on what the highest shipping APU configuration will be. Kaveri will have up to 4 CPU core (2 modules), which will be based on AMD’s latest revision of their desktop CPU architecture, Steamroller. Meanwhile the GPU will be composed of 8 GCN 1.1 CUs, which would put the SP count at 512 SPs (this would be equivalent to today's desktop Radeon HD 7750). Furthermore AMD is throwing around a floating point performance number – 856 GFLOPS – which thanks to some details found in AMD's footnotes by PCWorld gives us specific clockspeeds and even a product name. A10-7850K CPU clockspeed 3.7GHz, GPU clockspeed 720MHz.
Last edited by SUPERKAMES; 11-11-2013 at 08:07 PM.
FYI: 3.7 GHz is base clock, not turbo.
www.teampclab.pl
MOA 2009 Poland #2, AMD Black Ops 2010, MOA 2011 Poland #1, MOA 2011 EMEA #12
Test bench: empty
Will be interesting how the HUMA Memory Controller affects performance in different situations...
Smile
I thought it was suppose to hit 1 Tflops?
Still cool to see kaveri finally emerging!
Huma will be interesting
FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
OCZ ZX 850w psu
Lian-Li Lancool K62
Samsung 830 128g
2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
Win7 Home 64bit
My Rig
They didn't hit 1TF as it seems they have missed the target GPU clock range. If it was ~900Mhz the 1TF would have been achieved. That's a good 25% lower clock speed, I hope the GPU has some Turbo that can clock up at least 10% more.
my tip is 7850K will be 3.7GHz/4.1 GHz (turbo) and OC around 4500-4600 MHz stable max. Next tips: Around 10% better than A10-6800K (no clocks to clocks), single tread around 5%+, multi 10-17%+
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
My prediction.
Stock vs stock, 7850K (3.7/4.1Ghz) vs 6800K (4.1/4.4Ghz)
In ST: ~10-12% better performance on average. IPC ~20% higher.
In MT: ~22-25% better performance on average. "IPC" ~35% higher. I put it in quotation marks since IPC is really "only" 20% higher like in ST case but this time we don't have the ~10-15% penalty from shared decoder. I took mean number of ~13% and got to: 1.2x1.13=1.35 or 35% higher throughput.
Last edited by informal; 11-12-2013 at 01:12 PM.
Power efficiency will be better though
FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
OCZ ZX 850w psu
Lian-Li Lancool K62
Samsung 830 128g
2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
Win7 Home 64bit
My Rig
Seen this Kaveria 3.5GHz ES results over at Overclock.net http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/223722. As far as i remember geekbench tends to vary alot between run's so it's not that usefull. Memory speed has an huge impact on the overall score aswell. Anyway found this A8-6500 (3.5GHz) results with similar memory results but on an different os. http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekb...aseline=223722
Last edited by justapost; 11-24-2013 at 07:23 AM.
Bookmarks