Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 63 of 63

Thread: Vertex 4 F/W 1.3 vs 1.4 across ich10r, pch, Areca 1261 and 1880 and ...

  1. #51
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wichita, Ks
    Posts
    3,887
    LSI has seemed to be on the ball with the fixes, with the latest FW it may not be an issue anymore, which is a very positive thing!
    "Lurking" Since 1977


    Jesus Saves, God Backs-Up
    *I come to the news section to ban people, not read complaints.*-[XC]Gomeler
    Don't believe Squish, his hardware does control him!

  2. #52
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,838
    I've ran a few tests using ATTO (for sequentials only) on the LSI 9265, w/o caching. (Direct IO, Write Through, No read ahead)

    Keep in mind that the V3 is working with compressible data, they are in a "heavily used" state though, several TBs written to each drive w/o any cleaning (no TRIM as they are in raid) for 3-4 months, maybe more.
    The m4's are set up in a raid 00 (a span of 2x raid-0) so there are 4x 128GB drives, also in a used state.

    read_atto.png

    write_atto.png

    The V4's could do with some tuning on reads. (which can be seen in other tests as well, coming later...)
    -
    Hardware:

  3. #53
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warrenton, VA
    Posts
    3,029
    Yes, agree writes are looking nice, reads - so so ....


  4. #54
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warrenton, VA
    Posts
    3,029
    For fun cache run with old areca 1261

    2xvertex4, f/w 1.4.1.3, 1261/2gb, 4k stripe, disk write cache mode disabled, array as boot drive, 2600k @ 4.8ghz on m4e -

    Last edited by SteveRo; 06-19-2012 at 03:43 AM.

  5. #55
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,838
    A quick test on FW 1.5 shows that things are looking much better on the Areca 1880IX-16 4G

    There was a strange reading in ATTO (at 1KB) but compared to previous tests this is something that's worth playing with.

    1880IX-V4-FW15.PNG

    Areca V4-256-2R0 SCSI Disk Device_499GB_1GB-20120711-0014_FW_15.png

    (the results are cached, the point is that it's working, on earlier fw's it wouldn't finish any benchmark)

    I'll play a bit more too see if the ATTO anomaly at 1KB can be reproduced.

    edit:
    64KB strip size, Volume cache mode -> Write Back
    Last edited by Anvil; 07-10-2012 at 02:33 PM.
    -
    Hardware:

  6. #56
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    936
    For ATTO, try "Neither" instead of "Overlapped I/O"

    Also, try increasing the "Total Length" to 2GB (or whatever is the max allowed)

  7. #57
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,838
    I'll do some more testing later this week/weekend.

    My goal was just to see if it was working, at all
    -
    Hardware:

  8. #58
    PCMark V Meister
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Athens GR
    Posts
    771
    try to set 1mb stripe size on LSI controller and see what is happening on read write sequential and 4k@64 on sandforce controller

    (4xR0 1mb stripe size no cache on, direct io, no read ahead 3k kingstons)
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4kingstonIntel324.JPG 
Views:	326 
Size:	69.1 KB 
ID:	128302
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	iometerkingston3.jpg 
Views:	325 
Size:	234.7 KB 
ID:	128303
    Last edited by Tiltevros; 07-11-2012 at 02:15 AM.

  9. #59
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warrenton, VA
    Posts
    3,029
    WOW! 1.5 f/w is looking good - I will try!

    edit - Hey there Mr. Tilt - nice AS SSD run there!
    Last edited by SteveRo; 07-12-2012 at 04:02 AM.

  10. #60
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warrenton, VA
    Posts
    3,029
    Looks like vertex4 compatibility with areca 1880 might be fixed with F/W 1.5.
    Probably needs some time to check out completely but looking ok for the most part so far.
    I did have a glitch running Anvil Storage Utility, needed to rerun the read test and then all looks as expected'
    These are cache runs - 2xVertex4 128gb F/W 1.5 R0 Areca 1880 4GB on crosshair V formula with 3xcpu Phenom II X2 555 BE @ 4ghz -





    For comparison here is cache run - 2xVertex4 128gb F/W 1.5 R0 Areca 1261 2GB on X58 with W3520 @ 4ghz -




    Interesting that the Anvil benchmark keeps the name "ARC-1261" when switched from 1261 to 1880 - the array name is maintained as I did not recreate the array just moved the drives from 1261 to 1880
    Last edited by SteveRo; 07-12-2012 at 03:58 AM.

  11. #61

  12. #62
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    271
    1.5 does NOT fix issue with 1880ix controllers!
    The test system would get a timeout error on a reboot. A cold shutdown of the system is the only way to get it to boot properly.
    I would not recommend this drive with these controllers. Intel 520, Samsung 830, and Crucial M4 (with current FW) all work flawlessly and fast.

  13. #63
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,838
    I didn't notice any such issues.

    Will retry tonight.
    -
    Hardware:

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •