Page 5 of 18 FirstFirst ... 234567815 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 434

Thread: AMD Trinity news (looks, its near to launch?)

  1. #101
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Unfortunately, we didn't get a test platform and were only briefed a few days ago but here's the article nonetheless:

    http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...e-new-apu.html


  2. #102
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Winter Springs, FL
    Posts
    278
    Why yes, yes I do use Koolance..*Flame Wall Inbound*

  3. #103
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    28
    I hope they release an 11.6" notebook w/ Trinity, and sweet jesus give me the ipad's screen on that notebook too please!

  4. #104
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,087
    Unimpressive.


    All systems sold. Will be back after Sandy Bridge!

  5. #105
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    526

  6. #106
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Winter Springs, FL
    Posts
    278
    Quote Originally Posted by Raqia View Post
    I hope they release an 11.6" notebook w/ Trinity, and sweet jesus give me the ipad's screen on that notebook too please!
    11.6" notebook w/ a 9.7" screen... what?
    Why yes, yes I do use Koolance..*Flame Wall Inbound*

  7. #107
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    West hartford, CT
    Posts
    2,804
    meh, trinity is an improvement, yes, but disappointing it doesnt 100% handle Intels HD4000 graphics

    suppose this is due to cpu limitations

    however I am impressed with Trinity's battery life compared to Ivy-Bridge, that is a huuuge win!
    Last edited by tbone8ty; 05-14-2012 at 08:54 PM.
    FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
    Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
    G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
    MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
    OCZ ZX 850w psu
    Lian-Li Lancool K62
    Samsung 830 128g
    2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
    Win7 Home 64bit
    My Rig

  8. #108
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    West hartford, CT
    Posts
    2,804
    Last edited by tbone8ty; 05-14-2012 at 09:04 PM.
    FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
    Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
    G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
    MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
    OCZ ZX 850w psu
    Lian-Li Lancool K62
    Samsung 830 128g
    2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
    Win7 Home 64bit
    My Rig

  9. #109
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    28
    Quote Originally Posted by The Jesus View Post
    11.6" notebook w/ a 9.7" screen... what?
    You know what I mean, pixel density and screen quality have just got to improve. Not that I would even mind a 9.7" screen of that quality on an 11.6" netbook.

  10. #110
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,445
    Quote Originally Posted by tbone8ty View Post
    meh, trinity is an improvement, yes, but disappointing it doesnt 100% handle Intels HD4000 graphics

    suppose this is due to cpu limitations

    however I am impressed with Trinity's battery life compared to Ivy-Bridge, that is a huuuge win!
    yeah idk what is up with that? i mean it looks as if it is the spu, because the games where ivy won are cpu intensive....but in those tests it was pretty much on par....only like 5 points difference?
    [MOBO] Asus CrossHair Formula 5 AM3+
    [GPU] ATI 6970 x2 Crossfire 2Gb
    [RAM] G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 16GB (4 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 1600
    [CPU] AMD FX-8120 @ 4.8 ghz
    [COOLER] XSPC Rasa 750 RS360 WaterCooling
    [OS] Windows 8 x64 Enterprise
    [HDD] OCZ Vertex 3 120GB SSD
    [AUDIO] Logitech S-220 17 Watts 2.1

  11. #111
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    139
    Quote Originally Posted by tbone8ty View Post
    meh, trinity is an improvement, yes, but disappointing it doesnt 100% handle Intels HD4000 graphics

    suppose this is due to cpu limitations

    however I am impressed with Trinity's battery life compared to Ivy-Bridge, that is a huuuge win!
    Batterly life isn't suprising since the ivB is a 45W model i thought..

    Would be interesting if anand would have done batterly life under load tests. since now we are comparing cpus where one has close to 30% more tdp. which should affect the batterly life under load significantly.. But we only have idle behavior as a way to go for.

  12. #112
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    West hartford, CT
    Posts
    2,804
    Quote Originally Posted by flyck View Post
    Batterly life isn't suprising since the ivB is a 45W model i thought..

    Would be interesting if anand would have done batterly life under load tests. since now we are comparing cpus where one has close to 30% more tdp. which should affect the batterly life under load significantly.. But we only have idle behavior as a way to go for.
    yah guess yur right

    http://hothardware.com/Reviews/AMD-T...eview/?page=12

    we will have to see when retail laptops start emerging and final product can be tested

    either way trinity is better in every way to llano, at least they got that right this time lol

    now AMD for darn sure better have 28nm steamroller/GCN ready for Haswell
    Last edited by tbone8ty; 05-14-2012 at 11:42 PM.
    FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
    Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
    G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
    MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
    OCZ ZX 850w psu
    Lian-Li Lancool K62
    Samsung 830 128g
    2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
    Win7 Home 64bit
    My Rig

  13. #113
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    nice guys, looks overall good n this segment
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  14. #114
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    519
    I was surprised the difference in 3D is so small. When Intel guys were talking about this, saying stronger cpu plus a bit weaker gpu will give AMD run for its money, I was a bit skeptical.

    Anyhow, I couldn't wait for IB, just bought myself Acer M3 the other day.. Seeing those Anand benchs, I don't think I messed up.

  15. #115
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    At least battery life is good, but wonder how it will perform once dualcore IBs with HD4000 are here.

  16. #116
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    201
    I'm kinda curious to see if higher speed ram would make much of any difference in these tests. Llano seemed to love the extra boost from that. I still like there was a improvement, but I'm going to hold off on one of these and stick with a tablet for now. See what the next AMD APU brings next year I guess.

  17. #117
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    very good results:
    a solid improvement on the same process, battery life improved while performance also improved, whats there to complain about.

    the hd4000 graphics were built to be twice as fast as hd3000 because its on 22nm, and that was a 45w cpu. look at its battery life test, its at the bottom of every one. i think intel might feel a little hurt they didnt push the gpu a little more since they got bullied around by a 35w 32nm chip vs their 45w 22nm chip.

    i would love to see what the A10-4655M can do considering its performance is only slightly less, but is a 25w chip. also the package is different FS1r2 vs FP2, so that could include more power savings outside of just the cpu. that would probably be the chip i buy if i was going to be getting a laptop anytime soon
    2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
    GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
    Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
    XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case

  18. #118
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Rockville, MD
    Posts
    426
    Pretty nice work by AMD, especially with respect to power. If I were going to get a new laptop it would definitely have trinity in it. That being said I think AMD better watch out - intel closed the gap quite a bit since sandy bridge. It will be interesting to see what happens in the next generation.
    Main PC
    i7 3770k
    Asus P8Z77-Deluxe
    4x4 GB Gskill Sniper
    Sandisk Extreme 240 GB
    Gigabyte GTX 670
    Coolermaster ATCS 840
    MCP35X - Apogee Drive II - MCR320


    HTPC
    i7 920
    Gigabyte EX58 UD5
    Sapphire 5670
    3x2 GB OCZ Platinum @ 7-7-7-20
    Corsair HX-650
    Silverstone LC10
    Intel X25-M G2

  19. #119
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,972
    Quote Originally Posted by tbone8ty View Post
    meh, trinity is an improvement, yes, but disappointing it doesnt 100% handle Intels HD4000 graphics

    suppose this is due to cpu limitations

    however I am impressed with Trinity's battery life compared to Ivy-Bridge, that is a huuuge win!
    Just opened the anandtech review, and its normal if you compare vantage and 06, the cpu score will win a big amount of the final score .... It is too clear in some games where at extremely low level graphics, Ivy will pass over, the cpu count more on this level, and at the moment you push a bit the detail ( in medium quality ), it invert the score .. I think AMD should really watch the cpu performance .. But anyway, there's too a big difference to the aimed price sector. As for a laptop, it will be interessant to have a price/perf/watt ratio ( ofc we need laptop for compare this )..
    Last edited by Lanek; 05-15-2012 at 08:18 AM.
    CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
    GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
    Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
    RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
    Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0

  20. #120
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    AMD will have die area and TDP room to push forward on CPU front with 28nm Steamroller core. There we may see some more significant IPC changes and clock speed increases. GPU part is already known, it will have ~512 GCN "cores" which is pretty big uplift versus Trinity and Llano. I think AMD will have no problems on the GPU side and if they are a bit more aggressive on CPU front they may close the gap to IB with SR core(Haswell will be main opponent but not immediately and not in all segments) .

  21. #121
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    London
    Posts
    577
    Thought of going IB, but Trinity is simply better for my needs. Faster gaming, cheaper, similar battery life (wtf?), less cpu performance which is masked by a fast ssd. I never thought id say this so soon but AMD have a winner with trinity and i cant wait to see what they come up with in the future with steamroller/gcn/smaller node. Bring it on.
    i7 920@4.34 | Rampage II GENE | 6GB OCZ Reaper 1866 | 8800GT (zzz) | Corsair AX750 | Xonar Essence ST w/ 3x LME49720 | HiFiMAN EF2 Amplifier | Shure SRH840 | EK Supreme HF | Thermochill PA 120.3 | MCP355 | XSPC Reservoir | 3/8" ID Tubing

    Phenom 9950BE @ 3400/2000 (CPU/NB) | Gigabyte MA790GP-DS4H | HD4850 | 4GB Corsair DHX @850 | Corsair TX650W | T.R.U.E Push-Pull

    E2160 @3.06 | ASUS P5K-Pro | BFG 8800GT | 4GB G.Skill @ 1040 | 600W Tt PP

    A64 3000+ @2.87 | DFI-NF4 | 7800 GTX | Patriot 1GB DDR @610 | 550W FSP

  22. #122
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  23. #123
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,366
    GPU performance of Trinity was little bit over-hyped. Seems like A8-4600 is a natural competitor for dual-core IB parts but those have half of die size of Trinity which is not good for AMD's margin. Also I wonder how A6 parts with cut-down GPU/CPU will perform against IB i3 parts with "full-size" HD4000.

  24. #124
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Well when IB matches Trinity's GPU it does it usually in a few CPU bound games in low quality modes. Where it loses ,it does so by a very large margin. Worst case scenario for Trinity is to lose more in those few titles where IB is competitive against fully fledged A8/A10 and come close(r) in those titles where it trailed it by a large margin before.

    I'm interested in 45W Trinity parts. I see no reason for AMD not to make those(we have IB,SB and Llano in this power band). It would be interesting to see how much the iGPU can scale with those 10 additional watts.

  25. #125
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    considering how long amd has been using 32nm its not quite as simple as saying, bad for margins. contracts and yields and other factors, could make its cost them less to produce some of the last 32nm with a bigger chip vs early 22nm parts as a smaller chip.

    for A6 vs i3 your still limited by tdp when it comes to such things. a full 4000 could be running at lower clocks to maintain 25w or less tdp
    in anands test the battery life of trinity vs hd4000 was about equal for their gaming (it was only mentioned in the text briefly, but it would be good to see how it really performs per watt in gaming)
    2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
    GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
    Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
    XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case

Page 5 of 18 FirstFirst ... 234567815 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •