+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 25 of 25

Thread: GIGABYTE Z77X-UD3H - Reviewed MVP, Gaming, 3DMark - UD3H vs MIVE-Z

  1. #1
    Pie assassin ZenEffect's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,031
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 41 Times in 30 Posts

    GIGABYTE Z77X-UD3H - Reviewed MVP, Gaming, 3DMark - UD3H vs MIVE-Z

    GIGABYTE Z77X-UD3H

    Today marks the launch of the new Z77 Chipset by intel, and with such launch comes a whole new slew of motherboards. Today we will be viewing the Gigabyte Z77X-UD3H

    Brief Overview ala GIGABYTE Marketing:

    GIGABYTE 7 series motherboards combine a host of new and exciting technologies with the latest Intel Z77 Express Chipset, creating a unique range of motherboard designs that harness the outstanding performance of the new 3rd generation Intel® Core™ processors. With an exclusive 'Digital' VRM design, GIGABYTE 3D Power and GIGABYTE 3D BIOS (Dual UEFI), GIGABYTE 7 series motherboards ensure exceptional power delivery and absolute control, with additional features that ensure an unrivalled experience on your next PC build.

    As a whole, GIGABYTE seems to have really gone all out on this board providing an exceptional value to not only the overclocker, but to the gamer, or general user who wants the satasfaction to know they got alot more than they paid for while keeping the peace of mind with ultimate stability and performance. We will dig right into the performance of the board then compare it against the previous generation, and THEN go sub-zero to see how she reacts under high load conditions.

    Lets kick this off!

    The Nibbles and Bits

    Just a brief look at the board itself. It came packaged in a white box that had quite a few logos and tidbits of information. What peaked my interest is the Ultra Durable 4, mSATA, and VirtuMVP badges.

    The Gigabyte Z77X-UD3H

    Inside the box is the usual manual, SATA cables (blue or black), SLI bridge, case badge, and driver disc. Not much, but the value is in the board, not the accessories and trinkets.



    The matte black is truly black on this motherboard. Its not near black, or dark brown its BLACK! Its also heavier than it looks! If a zombie apocolypse were to occur and I need to throw something to decapitate the undead, this board would do the job. It feels very stiff as well. I noted on the box there is a new glass fabric PCB that fills in the gaps and mabye we can attribute the weight and stiffness to this. Its impossible to know for sure, but it makes me feel better knowing that the board will be arrow straight when I tighten down a heatsink due to its structrual resiliancy.



    The mSATA port on this drive is conveniently located in the center of the board. This provides a great out of the way location that doesnt take up space in the case. When connected, it utilizes SATA port 5.



    Some of you are going "UH OH! THERE IS NO HEATSINK?!?" Well, Im here to tell you that there is no worries. Through regular testing, benching, linx, and p95 I have yet to actually see the exposed PWM circutry get past 56C... and I dont even have a fan blowing directly across them. If you are still in doubt, stay tuned because this board is put through its paces.



    Flipping the board over, we see that all the heatsinks are screwed in. This is different than what is shown in the GIGABYTE media package, as well as images from CES and CEBIT that were floating around.... they are indeed screwed in.



    Not Realtek?!!? What are you a fanboy? The VIA VT2021 is capable of putputting 24bit/192KHz sound with a 110db SNR. When comparing the output of both Realtek vs. VIA, I'm finding that the VT2021 on this board is implemented in such a way that it sounds like its using burrbrown opamps. I know this isnt the case but thats how the audio is presented. Its got a nice laid back feeling though the bass isnt as "boomy" as a Realtek ALC889, it is well articulated and accurate.



    The SATA ports and SATA power connector to provide additional PCIe power. Im not quite sure how useful this is, but I intend to find out or kill something trying!



    Hey now! Thats what Ive been missing on the Z68XP-UD4! The LCD displays POST codes to help debug the system when overclocking or even if you are having issues during the initial setup.



    Power, Reset, Clear CMOS buttons... and oh yea... voltage readout points. Why they included all of this in a sub $200 boad is beyond me, but I sure am glad that they did.


    The rear IO ports consist of:
    1.1 x PS/2 keyboard/mouse port
    2.1 x D-Sub port
    3.1 x DVI-D port
    4.1 x optical S/PDIF Out connector
    5.1 x HDMI port
    6.1 x DisplayPort
    7.2 x eSATA 6Gb/s connectors
    8.6 x USB 3.0/2.0 ports
    9.1 x RJ-45 port
    10.6 x audio jacks (Center/Subwoofer Speaker Out, Rear Speaker Out, Side Speaker Out, Line In/Mic In, Line Out)



    You mother said you would go blind if you keep doing that, so enough of the pr0n!

    Synthetic Benchmarks

    I have reserved some space to accomodate a direct comparison of these benchmarks against a Maximus IV Extreme-Z. The direct comparison will be posted later today with a bit more information as well.

    Test Setup:
    Z77X-UD3H (obviously)
    Intel 2600K @ 4.8GHz (sorry, no ivy benches yet )
    2x2GB Gskill RipJawsX F317600CL7D-4GBXHD @ 2133 7-10-7-24-1T
    GTX580 @ 950/1900/1250
    2x Kingston HyperX SSD 120GB SATA3 RAID0
    Thermalright Venomous X - Delta 120MM 155CFM fan


    3DMark01



    3DMark03



    3DMark05



    3DMark06



    3DMark Vantage



    3DMark11



    Heaven DX9



    Heaven DX11



    Aquamark3



    SuperPi 32M



    SuperPi 1M



    AS SSD



    HDTach



    PCMark05



    PCMark Vantage



    PCMark7




    Concluding the synthetic benchmarks. As you can see we have some numbers. Unless you have the data to compare it with the previous generation they mean nothing to the naked eye. I have reserved such space to make this comparison.


    GAMING + MVP


    There are a great many of you out there in internet land going "man, I wish I knew more about that MVP thingy" well here it is... a word from Lucid Logix:

    Designed for the next generation of Intel Sandy Bridge Z68/H67/H61 and other Intel integrated graphics as well as many AMD processor-based notebooks, all in one PCs and desktop motherboards, Virtu MVP has many of the same features as the popular Virtu software, but with a twist – the addition of the optional Hyperformance™ feature for intelligent reduction of redundant rendering tasks in the flow between the CPU, GPU and display. Together with improved power management, Virtu MVP:
    •Boosts responsiveness to the game at any frame rate

    •Improves gaming frame rates 30-70%

    •Increases Vsync frame rates – up to 120 FPS and beyond

    •Sharpens visual quality without tearing

    •Works seamlessly with hundreds of game stations

    How Hyperformance Works

    3D games put the greatest demands on both the CPU and GPU. And as the race for higher performance on the PC and now in notebooks never ends, both CPUs and GPUs keep getting more robust. Despite this, display refresh rates have remained fairly flat over the years, 60-75 Hz, except for 3D stereo displays at 120Hz. Lucid takes advantage of this disparity and eliminates redundant rendering tasks and predicts potential synchronization issues in the graphics delivery pipeline and intelligently removes and or replaces them for better game control.


    The real question is "Does it actually work?" Many of you may want to upgrade to Z77 just for this technology. Though Lucid claims it can work on Z68 motherboards, there is a license key embedded in the BIOS that allows this program to run full featured or not. Yes it IS possible to run on something like a Maximus IV Extreme-Z however there will be a floating annoying banner ad that will get you killed in a heartbeat if you try any kind of competitive first person shooter. Using the software on anything but a licensed board is not recommended as the user may experience constant crashing, or just general dissatasfaction from MVP due to the flying banner.

    With that said, the technology is developed by Lucid and is still pretty buggy. Some versions of the software will give better boosts in games and synthetic benchmarks than others. For example, the 110a version is better for Heaven DX9 than the 111 version. Kinda strange but whatever. The driver version being used today is 2.1.111.21241. This was NOT the driver that was included in the disc. The driver that was included does not work for me. Ive seen it work for pleanty of other people, but just not me. Im not sure as to the why, but I suspect its the combination of prerequisite software that I refuse to install + operating system.

    Lets kick this off now shall we?

    Dirt2
    Settings: Ultra Preset 8XMSAA 1920x1080
    MVP OFF



    MVP ON



    Wow now thats quite a boost! So far so good!

    Mafia II

    Resolution: 1920x1080 all settings maxed - APEX PhysX OFF

    MVP OFF



    MVP ON



    Again, MVP is working as expected here

    Metro 2033

    Metro 2033 had a performance profile built into the drivers, however its configuration setting showed that though it is compatible to run, no gains were to be expected. This seems to hint to me that in future software developement Lucid will improve compatibility and performance

    MVP OFF



    MVP ON



    Uh oh, loss of frame rate. Kind of expected though as MVP is still new, and the drivers indicated that no gain was to be expected. For now if you really like Metro, turn off Lucid. Its just a simple 3 clicks of the mouse to shut it off.

    Crysis

    Another game that is not currently supported... we throw it on there anyways. As a note, when enabling VSYNC in the benchmark, there was no notable difference in frame rate between MVP ON and OFF

    MVP OFF



    MVP ON



    Hmmmm... another loss in frame rate. I say again though... when testing with VSYNC enabled, the framerate rose to the 56FPS mark again, the difference here is there was no apparent screen tearing. Though this result seems like a mixed bag, I would say that MVP actually improves image quality when enabled.

    Crysis WARHEAD

    This title was shown to have a hyperperformance profile built into the driver. On the tested 112 driver, performance was worse than on 110a. Im positive that with future releases of the MVP software, better efficiency and consistancy will be achieved

    MVP OFF



    MVP ON



    Here we see no real boost in frame rate. To me this is still OK as Virtual VSync prevented screen tearing. Once again, though the benefit may not be seen in numbers, it is seen in image quality

    Total War: Shogun 2 DX9

    MVP OFF



    MVP ON



    Hey boost in frame rate and no screen tearing! What more can you ask for?

    Total War: Shogun 2 DX11

    MVP OFF



    MVP ON



    Another one of those mixed bag results. In DX9 there is a boost, in DX11, there is a loss. Further development from Lucid should resolve this issue. :


    Bioshock 2

    Before we look at the benchmark data, I must make a few points. There is no benchmark utility for this game that I am aware of. The benchmark was taken playing through the 1st level using the same path in approximately the same amount of time. When compiling the FPS data, I had noticed that both the benchmarks took exactly 361 seconds to complete. Settings were completely maxed with a resolution of 1920x1080. I will state right now that MVP OFF exhibits a HIGHER frame rate, however if you look at the data, MVP ON provides a much smoother frame rate overall and no screen tearing. MVP has its benefits here.

    MVP OFF



    MVP ON



    If I were actually playing this game... it would be with MVP ON... my monitor operates at 60Hz

    Last edited by ZenEffect; 04-08-2012 at 08:04 PM.
    Current Status - Testing & Research

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ZenEffect For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Pie assassin ZenEffect's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,031
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 41 Times in 30 Posts
    Z77X-UD3H vs Maximus IV Extreme-Z


    The upmost care was taken to replicate the same testing envronment throughout the benchmarking process. The same drivers, operating system, and environmental variables were replicated exactly on both systems tested. All components were the same with the exeption of the motherboard.

    Test System:

    Windows 7 Ultimate x64
    2600K @ 4.8GHz
    Gskill RipJawsX F3-17600CL7D-4GBXHD
    Z77X-UD3H F6 BIOS
    Maximus Extreme-Z 3203 BIOS
    2x Kingston HyperX 120GB SATA3 SSD RAID0
    Geforce GTX580 950/1900/1250


    3DMARK01


    CENTER]

    Here the MIVE-Z edges out the Z77X-UD3H. 300 points really isnt much, and with the variance in 3DMark01 scores depending on what time of day, what kind of solar activity is occurring etc we can call this close enough to tie. The Maximus IV Extreme-Z was run using the "Extreme Tweaking" option that is specific to 3DMark01 set to ON


    Z77X-UD3H - 71337
    MIVE-Z - 71648


    3DMARK03




    Again, ASUS takes the win. It would be safe to assume, as the board develops, efficency will get better.

    Z77X-UD3H - 121294
    MIVE-Z - 121938


    3DMARK05



    It seems the trend continues. The well matured Maximus IV Extreme-Z bests the UD3H again. We can see what an entire product cycle can bring to the table in terms of efficency after product maturity.


    Z77X-UD3H - 42884
    MIVE-Z - 44350


    3DMARK06



    Hmmm... beginning to sound like a broken record... but the Maximus IV Extreme-Z manages to barely squeak by with a slightly higher CPU score



    Z77X-UD3H - 34457
    MIVE-Z - 34537


    3DMARK VANTAGE P


    Hey, the Z77X-UD3H pulls a win! Seems we might be starting a trend here

    Z77X-UD3H - 32105
    MIVE-Z - 31454


    3DMARK11



    Another win! The Z77X-UD3H manages to best the Maximus IV Extreme-Z. This test seemed anomolous so it was repeated with very similar results from both boards



    Z77X-UD3H - 8331
    MIVE-Z - 7974



    PCMARK05



    Seems that the Z77X UD3H wants to keep the ball rolling. The UD3H barely sqeaks by the MIVE-Z in PCMARK05.


    Z77X-UD3H - 30548
    MIVE-Z - 30535



    SuperPi 32M



    What is going on here? I re-tested 3 times each with the same result on both boards. The Z77X-UD3H appears to be much more efficient in this test. Ive re-checked and re-checked to make sure I didn't miss anything because 2 seconds is unexpected.


    Z77X-UD3H - 7.03.744
    MIVE-Z - 7.05.086


    CONCLUSION!??!


    Just comparing the top end offering on Z68 platform to the "midrange" offering by Gigabyte, its clear to see we have a real winner here... but to draw the conclusion as to what board is better, to each their own. Both boards performed very well across all benchmarks. As the old addage goes, you win some and you lose some. The ray of light here that gets me excited is that the board released TODAY. I can only imagine what the future holds as BIOS developement and efficiency improves.

    If you are on the edge about upgrading from P67 or Z68, the features this board offers makes it an easy choice. Currently the board is at newegg for $170... Thats an incredible bargain for what the UD3H has to offer. Voltage read out points, onboard buttons for power, reset, and clear cmos functions, debug lcd, Lucid MVP, great sounding audio, and ultra durable dependability you cant really go wrong.

    The UD3H has really grown on me and is a fantastic board and I'm not done with it yet. More to come very soon...
    Last edited by ZenEffect; 04-10-2012 at 07:47 PM.
    Current Status - Testing & Research

  4. #3
    Pie assassin ZenEffect's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,031
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 41 Times in 30 Posts
    reserved.
    Current Status - Testing & Research

  5. #4
    I am Xtreme Hondacity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,583
    Thanks
    110
    Thanked 40 Times in 26 Posts
    heatsink would be better if it were black


  6. #5
    Pie assassin ZenEffect's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,031
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 41 Times in 30 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Hondacity View Post
    heatsink would be better if it were black
    what what what?!?! dude, thats my argument for just about everything! that car would be better if it were black.... that cat would be better if it were black.... that jerk's eye would be better if it were black...

    I do agree, though the aesthetics of the heatsink make it match my F3-17000LC8D nicely.
    Current Status - Testing & Research

  7. #6
    I am Xtreme Hondacity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,583
    Thanks
    110
    Thanked 40 Times in 26 Posts
    my reasoning against the blue was

    1. they had black prior generation
    2. their blue isn't sp32m efficient lol jk
    3. picture says it all. if it doesn't ...msi and asus have better blue colors. being different would have been nice.




  8. #7
    I am Xtreme sin0822's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    France
    Posts
    3,461
    Thanks
    50
    Thanked 195 Times in 65 Posts
    you ever stop to realize the lighting for MSI and ASUS pictures is done to not show that their PCB looks brown in person?
    I agree i like black better.

  9. #8
    Pie assassin ZenEffect's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,031
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 41 Times in 30 Posts
    honda prefers petty blue vs actual blue?
    Current Status - Testing & Research

  10. #9
    I am Xtreme Hondacity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,583
    Thanks
    110
    Thanked 40 Times in 26 Posts
    the lightning have two versions..
    the asus matrix is matt black...like gigabutt..

    in person lol yes


    @zen

    skyblue and bigbang blue are classics :p


  11. #10
    Xtreme Enthusiast Mafio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    505
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
    who cares about colors ?

    are 3dmark 01 performance ok or we have to wait for a magic BIOS like with p67/z68 stuff ?

  12. #11
    Pie assassin ZenEffect's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,031
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 41 Times in 30 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mafio View Post
    who cares about colors ?

    are 3dmark 01 performance ok or we have to wait for a magic BIOS like with p67/z68 stuff ?
    2nd post updated with your answer
    Current Status - Testing & Research

  13. #12
    I am Xtreme sin0822's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    France
    Posts
    3,461
    Thanks
    50
    Thanked 195 Times in 65 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Hondacity View Post
    the lightning have two versions..
    the asus matrix is matt black...like gigabutt..

    in person lol yes


    @zen

    skyblue and bigbang blue are classics :p
    i said lighting, not lightning. Can you ad data labels to your graphs?

    Good job.
    Last edited by sin0822; 04-08-2012 at 08:22 PM.

  14. #13
    Pie assassin ZenEffect's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,031
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 41 Times in 30 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by sin0822 View Post
    i said lighting, not lightning. Can you ad data labels to your graphs?

    Good job.
    sure can! need to update my excel anyways. I have some metrics for z68xp-ud4, p67a-ud7, maximus, and z77-ud3 i need to put together.

    *edit* charts updated and are now more aesthetically pleasing.
    Last edited by ZenEffect; 04-08-2012 at 09:32 PM.
    Current Status - Testing & Research

  15. #14
    Xtreme Enthusiast Mafio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    505
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ZenEffect View Post
    2nd post updated with your answer
    thanks a lot

  16. #15
    Pie assassin ZenEffect's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,031
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 41 Times in 30 Posts



    some 4 slot action...

    at this point, ive exceeded the bclk capable on my mive-z on air... and far beyond what it could clock with all dimms occupied. getting this memory frequency with all slots on sandy is actually a piece of cake!

    just booted 106.00... i didnt expect that at all..
    Last edited by ZenEffect; 04-09-2012 at 09:18 PM.
    Current Status - Testing & Research

  17. #16
    Wanna look under my kilt? K404's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Glasgow-ish U.K.
    Posts
    4,466
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 41 Times in 25 Posts
    Please can you adjust the graph scaling? The score difference is massively exaggerated. Also..... would you consider ditching the "angled" bars, it makes the scores harder to read.

    Otherwise, a lot of info. Good comparison to the Asus
    Quote Originally Posted by T_M View Post
    Not sure i totally follow anything you said, but regardless of that you helped me come up with a very good idea....
    Quote Originally Posted by soundood View Post
    you sigged that?

    why?
    ______

    Sometimes, it's not your time. Sometimes, you have to make it your time. Sometimes, it can ONLY be your time.

  18. #17
    I am Xtreme sin0822's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    France
    Posts
    3,461
    Thanks
    50
    Thanked 195 Times in 65 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ZenEffect View Post



    some 4 slot action...

    at this point, ive exceeded the bclk capable on my mive-z on air... and far beyond what it could clock with all dimms occupied. getting this memory frequency with all slots on sandy is actually a piece of cake!

    just booted 106.00... i didnt expect that at all..
    try 107 its really easy.

  19. #18
    Pie assassin ZenEffect's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,031
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 41 Times in 30 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by sin0822 View Post
    try 107 its really easy.
    107 was quite easy... couldnt boot 107 but boot 106 + ET6 made going past 107 a breeze. By far the best bclk board i have in my arsenal thus far.
    Current Status - Testing & Research

  20. #19
    Xtreme Mentor stasio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    2,640
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 99 Times in 70 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ZenEffect View Post

    some 4 slot action...

    at this point, ive exceeded the bclk capable on my mive-z on air... and far beyond what it could clock with all dimms occupied. getting this memory frequency with all slots on sandy is actually a piece of cake!

    just booted 106.00... i didnt expect that at all..
    Very nice with 4 sticks.
    Vdimm,VTT, IMC...?
    Need a Gigabyte latest BIOS?
    GA-Z77X-UP5 TH (F13a) , Core i7-3770K @ 4.8GHz
    Team Xtreem 2600MHz C10 4x4GB @ 2666 (10-12-12-25-CR1)
    G.Skill F3-2600C10D-8GTXD @ 2666 (10-12-12-25-CR1)
    G.Skill F3-17000CL8D-4GBXMD @ 2400 (10-12-12-27-CR1)
    Corsair Force GT 60, WD Caviar Black SATA3 1TB HDD,
    Evga GTS 450SC, Gigabyte Superb 720W
    XSPC RayStorm D5 EX240 (Liquid Ultra)
    Windows 7 SP1 x64/Win 8 6.2.9200 x64

  21. #20
    I am Xtreme Leeghoofd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10,306
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 66 Times in 43 Posts
    Getting lower FPS with Dirt 3 and BF3 and Virtu also doesn't feel smooth at all in some games... in it's current state I'll take a pass... image quality can be advertised as better , the game experience seems not
    Last edited by Leeghoofd; 04-10-2012 at 02:16 PM.
    Question : Why do some overclockers switch into d*ckmode when money is involved

    Remark : They call me Pro Asus Saaya yupp, I agree

  22. #21
    I am Xtreme Hondacity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,583
    Thanks
    110
    Thanked 40 Times in 26 Posts
    can it go beyond 110blck?


  23. #22
    Xtreme Mentor stasio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    2,640
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 99 Times in 70 Posts
    Probably yes,but with IB.
    Need a Gigabyte latest BIOS?
    GA-Z77X-UP5 TH (F13a) , Core i7-3770K @ 4.8GHz
    Team Xtreem 2600MHz C10 4x4GB @ 2666 (10-12-12-25-CR1)
    G.Skill F3-2600C10D-8GTXD @ 2666 (10-12-12-25-CR1)
    G.Skill F3-17000CL8D-4GBXMD @ 2400 (10-12-12-27-CR1)
    Corsair Force GT 60, WD Caviar Black SATA3 1TB HDD,
    Evga GTS 450SC, Gigabyte Superb 720W
    XSPC RayStorm D5 EX240 (Liquid Ultra)
    Windows 7 SP1 x64/Win 8 6.2.9200 x64

  24. #23
    Pie assassin ZenEffect's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,031
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 41 Times in 30 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by stasio View Post
    Very nice with 4 sticks.
    Vdimm,VTT, IMC...?
    vdimm 1.75 bios (about 1.72 real)
    vtt 1.085
    imc 0.925
    cpu pll 1.785 *key voltage for me*

    *edit*



    still 4 sticks here @ 2133 divider. system was a bit unstable so the screen shot isnt showing it (crashed opening multiple instances of cpuz...) probably stressing imc too much. you can only do so much on AIR... same settings as i said.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hondacity View Post
    can it go beyond 110blck?
    yes probably. i can get close to 108 on air... cold usually gives me 4-5bclk. will skype you a result this weekend. i finally have a bit of free time.

    Quote Originally Posted by Leeghoofd View Post
    Getting lower FPS with Dirt 3 and BF3 and Virtu also doesn't feel smooth at all in some games... in it's current state I'll take a pass... image quality can be advertised as better , the game experience seems not
    the non-smoothness im finding is a few things... it usually occurs when virtual vsync is ON and in the application it is OFF. what you can also do is rename the executable... as an example, if you rename am3 to 3dmark06.exe you get lower score + stuttering than if you name it heaven.exe... if it still doesnt resolve THEN you can disable virtual vsync and hope for a bumped fps from hyperperformance. if none work... wait for updated lucid driver

    I didnt include skyrim in this even though i could have... lucid + skyrim = 30min to launch the game. i tried launching, didnt get anything within a reasonable amount of time and started doing other things.... middle of a bench skyrim launches! had to scrap everything inbetween that time and re-bench.

    Quote Originally Posted by K404 View Post
    Please can you adjust the graph scaling? The score difference is massively exaggerated. Also..... would you consider ditching the "angled" bars, it makes the scores harder to read.

    Otherwise, a lot of info. Good comparison to the Asus
    yes i can adjust the graph scaling... but its not massive exaggerated, its actually to scale. its essentially "zoomed in" on just the top of the graph. I like the 3d bars, 2d bars look very flat without rounded corners gradient and light effects. I realized that the scores on a graph are always hard to read... thats why they are posted right under the graph with a link to a screen shot of the actual run but since you mentioned it, i will put up revised graphs just for you. *edit* done.
    Last edited by ZenEffect; 04-10-2012 at 05:16 PM.
    Current Status - Testing & Research

  25. #24
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    30
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    impressive work, and very detailed.

    thanks for taking the time to post. Reviews such as these never seem to get the credit they should.

  26. #25
    Pie assassin ZenEffect's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,031
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 41 Times in 30 Posts
    pics are now not broken

    new bios!
    F8D
    Last edited by ZenEffect; 04-19-2012 at 04:16 PM.
    Current Status - Testing & Research

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts