Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 76 to 88 of 88

Thread: xtremeoverlocking - pushing the 3930K/3960X to 4.5 GHz

  1. #76
    Xtreme 3D Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,499
    Quote Originally Posted by alpha754293 View Post
    BeepBeep2:

    Uhh...tried it with a RAMdrive. Surprisingly, it did even worse. (I don't think that I've published those results here either). Like...a LOT worse. Probably because it was a "software" drive kinda-dealio.

    It would likely be different with differen RAMdisk softwares and so I only tried one. And the system that I was testing it on only had 8 GB of RAM, so I only gave it half of that.

    I would also think that if I were to do this kind of test in Linux that I would end up with a different result, but I don't know if Linux will actually let me put the swap partition on a RAMdrive. *shrug* Probably, but might take some finessing with the installation bootloader in order to make it play nice with that, so I didn't spend too much time with that.

    (The original intent with the system that had 128 GB of RAM was to allocate half of it as a RAMdrive/swap.)

    I never actually asked if the onboard video can be overclocked. I just asked if I can overclock a LGA2011 CPU that came with onboard video. And yes, there is a difference between the two where the former is (CPU+GPU)*overclock whereas the latter is (CPU*overclock)+GPU. totalllly different things.

    I thought that with some of those IGPs that they were on it's own separate bus/die or something in that you can OC the CPU indepdentent of the GPU. *shrug* (Could be wrong/mistaken again. Or that might be old news with older processors.) I don't follow the Sandy Bridge development that closely. But by another token, it doesn't really matter because the 3xxx series doesn't even have an IGP.

    I was looking for onboard video since I already knew that this was going to run headless, so didn't really see the point of getting a dedicated GPU if I'm not going to use it. (Most of my other systems now also run headless.)

    whoops...haha....I thought that I had answered that, but that must have been in the post that got lost because I clicked on the attachment link in the same window instead of spawning a new tab for it. my bad. No, none of my programs can really use GPUs. (One sorta can, but it's limited in size and scope of problems for now. And as far as I know, it's Tesla only (*with the fine print being it may work on consumer class GPUs, but I have no documentation for it because it's not officially supported that way).)

    Regardless, I had no intention of wanting to OC the GPU (discrete or othrewise) at all.

    From the screenshot that I took above, it doesn't look like that the case is closed OR that there's a side fan at all. But like I said, if you can point it out to me, that'd be much appreciated. (I must be going blind cuz I can't seem to find it as there's nothing in that picture that resumes a side fan.)

    "Certainly another intake would help create positive pressure within the case."

    Uhh....not necessarily. (skipping over the conservation of mass (skipping over the time derivative as well) proof.)

    Nice animations. Ummm....don't think that it's quite that simplistic though...don't know if that's entirely accurate either, but ok.
    That is a bit more reasonable reply.

    As for the onboard video:
    Also, this might be a bit of a silly question - but does anybody know if anybody's going to be coming out with a LGA2011 board that has onboard video that can also OC?
    You were a bit unclear. Regardless, the onboard video and CPU would be on a different bus/multiplier

    The case is closed, but there is no side fan.
    Smile

  2. #77
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    349
    Quote Originally Posted by BeepBeep2 View Post
    That is a bit more reasonable reply.
    Now you're just baiting me, aren't you?
    Last edited by alpha754293; 03-27-2012 at 02:44 PM.
    flow man:
    du/dt + u dot del u = - del P / rho + v vector_Laplacian u
    {\partial\mathbf{u}\over\partial t}+\mathbf{u}\cdot\nabla\mathbf{u} = -{\nabla P\over\rho} + \nu\nabla^2\mathbf{u}

  3. #78
    Xtreme 3D Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,499
    Quote Originally Posted by alpha754293 View Post
    Now you're just baiting me, aren't you?
    No, of course not. Its just that for once you replied without talking to me like I was a total idiot.
    Smile

  4. #79
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    349
    Quote Originally Posted by BeepBeep2 View Post
    No, of course not. Its just that for once you replied without talking to me like I was a total idiot.
    Speaking about airflows - ideally, your case should be neutral pressure. (i.e. air is going in as fast as it is going out).

    Surprisingly, there's only one chassis series from Supermicro that even have a bank of 120 mm fans. And two of them still supports Ultra320 SCSI.
    http://www.supermicro.com/products/c...C942i-R760.cfm

    Maybe I can mount the rad behind that?

    But otherwise, it should have plenty of space for the Noctua D14.

    Also, apparently, some of those 120x120x38 mm fans can push 120 CFM at 46.5 dB(A) at 3150 rpm. (I'm sure that the PWM will bring that down), but...that's quite a bit of air.
    http://elcodis.com/parts/453100/KD1212PMBX-6_A_F.html
    flow man:
    du/dt + u dot del u = - del P / rho + v vector_Laplacian u
    {\partial\mathbf{u}\over\partial t}+\mathbf{u}\cdot\nabla\mathbf{u} = -{\nabla P\over\rho} + \nu\nabla^2\mathbf{u}

  5. #80
    Xtreme 3D Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,499
    Quote Originally Posted by alpha754293 View Post
    Speaking about airflows - ideally, your case should be neutral pressure. (i.e. air is going in as fast as it is going out).

    Surprisingly, there's only one chassis series from Supermicro that even have a bank of 120 mm fans. And two of them still supports Ultra320 SCSI.
    http://www.supermicro.com/products/c...C942i-R760.cfm

    Maybe I can mount the rad behind that?

    But otherwise, it should have plenty of space for the Noctua D14.

    Also, apparently, some of those 120x120x38 mm fans can push 120 CFM at 46.5 dB(A) at 3150 rpm. (I'm sure that the PWM will bring that down), but...that's quite a bit of air.
    http://elcodis.com/parts/453100/KD1212PMBX-6_A_F.html
    Yes, it seems you can mount the rad behind that. Of course, it will sound like a jet taking off...
    Also, in your SSD thread it looks as if the RevoDrive is bottlenecked by the Gen 1 slot (~1GB/s) and I can't really explain the result for the Vertex 3...and the BSOD issues/dropping out could have been because of faulty NAND/incompatibility with your motherboard.

    Have you thought at all about running normal SATA drives in something like RAID 5?
    Last edited by BeepBeep2; 03-27-2012 at 05:37 PM.
    Smile

  6. #81
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    349
    Quote Originally Posted by BeepBeep2 View Post
    Yes, it seems you can mount the rad behind that. Of course, it will sound like a jet taking off...

    Also, in your SSD thread it looks as if the RevoDrive is bottlenecked by the Gen 1 slot (~1GB/s) and I can't really explain the result for the Vertex 3...
    46.5 dB(A) isn't that bad. I think that the highest I've hit is actually around 90 dB(A) (x6) (SunFire X4200). THAT was loud. Upside, CPUs had passive heatsinks and it was pushing 600 CFM.

    The Vertex 3 was on a SATA 3 Gbps (or SAS 3 Gbps - tested it both ways).

    It was such a shame when the RevoDrive kept dropped offline that OCZ issued an RMA for it.
    flow man:
    du/dt + u dot del u = - del P / rho + v vector_Laplacian u
    {\partial\mathbf{u}\over\partial t}+\mathbf{u}\cdot\nabla\mathbf{u} = -{\nabla P\over\rho} + \nu\nabla^2\mathbf{u}

  7. #82
    Xtreme 3D Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,499
    Whoops, I was editing my post and didn't realize you had already replied.
    Most of us here are sitting a foot or two away from our desktop in our homes so noise vs performance means a big deal and hence why I linked all the fan tests from Martin's Liquid Lab.
    ~45 dB(A) is about as loud as anyone here will possibly tolerate, I've got a 3800 RPM Delta that is rated at about 50 dB(A) for when I used to overclock/benchmark on air cooling

    Now I'm down to 1850 RPM Nidec Servo Gentle Typhoons for normal use. They are much more tolerable to me than any other fan I own.

    Now, if you want to go back to ATX Desktop Mid Tower cases I would recommend this one from Lian Li:
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16811112304

    ...use something like a Noctua NH-D14 or Thermalright Silver Arrow, and swap the fans out with 5 of these:
    http://www.frozencpu.com/products/12...12B7AP-29.html
    Smile

  8. #83
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    349
    Quote Originally Posted by BeepBeep2 View Post
    Whoops, I was editing my post and didn't realize you had already replied.
    Most of us here are sitting a foot or two away from our desktop in our homes so noise vs performance means a big deal and hence why I linked all the fan tests from Martin's Liquid Lab.
    ~45 dB(A) is about as loud as anyone here will possibly tolerate, I've got a 3800 RPM Delta that is rated at about 50 dB(A) for when I used to overclock/benchmark on air cooling

    Now I'm down to 1850 RPM Nidec Servo Gentle Typhoons for normal use. They are much more tolerable to me than any other fan I own.

    Now, if you want to go back to ATX Desktop Mid Tower cases I would recommend this one from Lian Li:
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16811112304

    ...use something like a Noctua NH-D14 or Thermalright Silver Arrow, and swap the fans out with 5 of these:
    http://www.frozencpu.com/products/12...12B7AP-29.html
    My workstation right now has two Dynatrons on it so that's about 50 dB(A) as well. If a system was going to be much louder than that, then they get moved into the spare room (a.k.a. the server room). Hence why the headless state.

    It's not so bad if I have the side cover on it.

    I couldn't sit/work next to the SunFire X4200 for more than 15 minutes at a time because it was so loud that it was actually giving me a headache. Literally. And that's even WITH headphones on.
    flow man:
    du/dt + u dot del u = - del P / rho + v vector_Laplacian u
    {\partial\mathbf{u}\over\partial t}+\mathbf{u}\cdot\nabla\mathbf{u} = -{\nabla P\over\rho} + \nu\nabla^2\mathbf{u}

  9. #84
    s4pphire
    Guest
    Hitting 4.5 on a 3930 or 3960 will take roughly 1.3-1.38V, most likely as someone already mentioned no more than ~1.34. With appropriate cooling and decent airflow (high-end air, H80+ etc.), maintaining the system at safe temperatures will not be an issue.

    However, 4.5 is considered a light to moderate overclock at best and I would be surprised if the CPU's life expectancy is affected much at this point. If configured properly, the system will be rock-solid stable no matter the workload. Your CPU might degrade after a year or two, thus needing a small voltage bump; but assuming your temperatures were within safe ranges and you didn't pump too high voltages through it, I wouldn't expect the CPU to degrade before the useful life span is over.

    Buying the 3930K is definitely the right choice, the price difference doesn't justify the performance difference. As for the board, I haven't tried the Sabertooth but according to most opinions it appears to be very solid. Besides that, the P9X79 WS might be worth looking into as well but in terms of price, the Sabertooth is probably the best choice as others have already told you.

  10. #85
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    349
    Thanks s4pphire.
    flow man:
    du/dt + u dot del u = - del P / rho + v vector_Laplacian u
    {\partial\mathbf{u}\over\partial t}+\mathbf{u}\cdot\nabla\mathbf{u} = -{\nabla P\over\rho} + \nu\nabla^2\mathbf{u}

  11. #86
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    349
    Quote Originally Posted by BeepBeep2 View Post
    Yes, it seems you can mount the rad behind that. Of course, it will sound like a jet taking off...
    Also, in your SSD thread it looks as if the RevoDrive is bottlenecked by the Gen 1 slot (~1GB/s) and I can't really explain the result for the Vertex 3...and the BSOD issues/dropping out could have been because of faulty NAND/incompatibility with your motherboard.

    Have you thought at all about running normal SATA drives in something like RAID 5?
    I don't think that the RevoDrive was bottlenecked at all considering that it was nowhere close to the theorectical peak. I dunno. OCZ couldn't figure it out either. But that's kind of dumb if there's a NAND incompatibility with a motherboard. It's a PCIe card, and therefore; it should fit into any PCIe slot.

    Are you talking about mechanical SATA drives or SSDs?

    I'm currently running Intel 520 + OCZ Vertex 3 (+ 4 2.5" Fujitsu 73 GB 10krpm SAS 3 Gbps drives + a Hitachi 1 TB 7.2krpm SATA 3 Gbps).
    flow man:
    du/dt + u dot del u = - del P / rho + v vector_Laplacian u
    {\partial\mathbf{u}\over\partial t}+\mathbf{u}\cdot\nabla\mathbf{u} = -{\nabla P\over\rho} + \nu\nabla^2\mathbf{u}

  12. #87
    Xtreme 3D Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,499
    Quote Originally Posted by alpha754293 View Post
    I don't think that the RevoDrive was bottlenecked at all considering that it was nowhere close to the theorectical peak. I dunno. OCZ couldn't figure it out either. But that's kind of dumb if there's a NAND incompatibility with a motherboard. It's a PCIe card, and therefore; it should fit into any PCIe slot.

    Are you talking about mechanical SATA drives or SSDs?

    I'm currently running Intel 520 + OCZ Vertex 3 (+ 4 2.5" Fujitsu 73 GB 10krpm SAS 3 Gbps drives + a Hitachi 1 TB 7.2krpm SATA 3 Gbps).
    The incompatibility problem would have more to do with the storage controller on the RevoDrive and how the motherboard BIOS was coded to handle storage over pcie...I'm not exactly an expert but I think that is how it goes.

    I was talking about SSDs.

    I would pick up four identical SSDs if I were you and run them in RAID 10 or RAID 5.
    Smile

  13. #88
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    349
    Quote Originally Posted by BeepBeep2 View Post
    The incompatibility problem would have more to do with the storage controller on the RevoDrive and how the motherboard BIOS was coded to handle storage over pcie...I'm not exactly an expert but I think that is how it goes.

    I was talking about SSDs.

    I would pick up four identical SSDs if I were you and run them in RAID 10 or RAID 5.
    I don't know if that would really do anything for IOPs though, especially when I'm going highly randomized writes like swap.

    RAID of any kind, (maybe perhaps with the exception of RAID 1 with two drives, and RAID 6 with three drives), works tremendously well with STRs but I don't think that it really make that much of a difference for random write performance. Besides, wouldn't that just add another layer of complexity to it? KISS.
    flow man:
    du/dt + u dot del u = - del P / rho + v vector_Laplacian u
    {\partial\mathbf{u}\over\partial t}+\mathbf{u}\cdot\nabla\mathbf{u} = -{\nabla P\over\rho} + \nu\nabla^2\mathbf{u}

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •