Team Xtreme LV 2400 9-11-11-28

[Splave]

^was going to mention trrsr to 4 but you figured it out by the last pic!

[andressergio]

^was going to mention trrsr to 4 but you figured it out by the last pic!

thx splave i achieved to pass hyperpi 32 and gammed BF3 for 15 min then crashed guess it needs more than 1,71 to be more stable or change some subtimming wich i need help for that

[Splave]

1.71!?@#! for 1350 9-12-12 I use 1.96v so you are safe to increase it a bit maybe try 1.75v

[andressergio]

anyone can help me tweak any parameter (not TRRSR) than can make that damn 25780 to 26 at least i hate to see it on 25ish (yes im crazy lol)

this is my stable settings

im at the limit using Latency Boundary 6 and all what you see, TRRSR is no go so i dont know what i can tweak to put a 26 on that 25ish on read

[andressergio]

1.71!?@#! for 1350 9-12-12 I use 1.96v so you are safe to increase it a bit maybe try 1.75v

thanks mate but i want 24/7 can you help me on my request as moving to TRRSR to 4 makes me go crazy on memtest

[andressergio]

i didn't have to do much here
Attachment 128247

show me 400% MEMTEST PASS and ill believe it mine passes that and already posted at the forum i can do the same as you but only bench

i want 24/7

[andressergio]

this is mine on the timmings you see, but hard to believe you can pass memtest on Team X at CL9 2600 i would like to see it really, as they have Samsung ICS

SPI32 / HYPERPI would never show stability, passing memtest above 300% its some nice clue you are stable



Uploaded with ImageShack.us

[Raja@ASUS]

You don't have too many options if you cannot increase VDIMM. Your only real bet is to see if you can get tRRSR to 4 by increasing tFAW by 4~6 clocks. If that does not do it, I would just stay happy with what you got as you will have to sacrifice too much for the frequency.

[Splave]

may I ask why you dont want to increase vDimm mate? they love the voltage scale quiet well

[andressergio]

You don't have too many options if you cannot increase VDIMM. Your only real bet is to see if you can get tRRSR to 4 by increasing tFAW by 4~6 clocks. If that does not do it, I would just stay happy with what you got as you will have to sacrifice too much for the frequency.

may I ask why you dont want to increase vDimm mate? they love the voltage scale quiet well

Thanks guys is not that i dont want to increase i would love to but 2800 i can bench i can pass hyperpi but cant game not stable...2600 i dont know how far to go as TRRSR on 4 its a nightmare with memtest wont pass at all, even at 1,75 maybe i have to lower other things to achieve TRRSR = 4 but i really dont know how to do it, this is my question asking
for help i dont have probelms at all to run 1,75 daily

if you can help me mod the timming to get TRRSR to 4 would be lovely

Thanks guys for ya help
Sergio

[andressergio]

i tried with Lat Boundary on 8 and letting all AUTO except 10-12-12-25 1T and putting 36 TFAW and TRRSR 4 and till 1,75 memtest fails

i also put Lat Boundary on 5 putting all auto same timmings increasing TFAW till 40 and same

this IMC is strong can go 2800+ but or the mem dont like it TRRSR on 4 or im doing something wrong

[Raja@ASUS]

Thanks guys is not that i dont want to increase i would love to but 2800 i can bench i can pass hyperpi but cant game not stable...2600 i dont know how far to go as TRRSR on 4 its a nightmare with memtest wont pass at all, even at 1,75 maybe i have to lower other things to achieve TRRSR = 4 but i really dont know how to do it, this is my question asking
for help i dont have probelms at all to run 1,75 daily

if you can help me mod the timming to get TRRSR to 4 would be lovely

Thanks guys for ya help
Sergio

The advice I gave you above is the intelligent way to do it. tFAW inserts spacing between four ACT commands, so an addition of 4 clock delay there in exchange for a back to back ACT is not a bad trade off (at least you maintain some back to back read request performance). If you cannot do that, you are chasing bandwidth for nothing and the trade off is not worth it. Not much more I can suggest from a real timing standpoint that makes sense in your situation. Up to you if you take the advice.

-Raja

[andressergio]

The advice I gave you above is the intelligent way to do it. tFAW inserts spacing between four ACT commands, so an addition of 4 clock delay there in exchange for a back to back ACT is not a bad trade off (at least you maintain some back to back read request performance). If you cannot do that, you are chasing bandwidth for nothing and the trade off is not worth it. Not much more I can suggest from a real timing standpoint that makes sense in your situation. Up to you if you take the advice.

-Raja

Raja yes thanks i did it i was on 26 TFAW put 30 then 34 then 38 and no way more i pass on memtest at 2600 TRRSR = 4 is 5% then error

[Raja@ASUS]

Then you need more voltage or to accept where you are is better for performance than chasing more bandwidth

[andressergio]

Then you need more voltage or to accept where you are is better for performance than chasing more bandwidth

yes im fine where i am very nice speed and low volts thanks raja for ur help

[ihog6hog]

Team-Xtreem-TXD38192M2133HC9NDC-L

2133 9-11-11-28 1.5V

Test Hyper-Pi 32M with New bios 1101 Asus Maximus V Gene

: 1.Improve Improve system stability.
2.Enhance compatibility with some USB devices.
3. Fixed Nvidia GTX 680 hang when runing with UEFI driver.
4.Support new CPUs. Please refer to our website at: http://support.asus.com/cpusupport/c...Language=en-us

Easy to run 2600 10-12-12-31 1T 1.65V VCCSA 1.05V VCCIO 1.05V

[Shiranui Gen-An]

Team-Xtreem-TXD38192M2133HC9NDC-L

2133 9-11-11-28 1.5V

Test Hyper-Pi 32M with New bios 1101 Asus Maximus V Gene

: 1.Improve Improve system stability.
2.Enhance compatibility with some USB devices.
3. Fixed Nvidia GTX 680 hang when runing with UEFI driver.
4.Support new CPUs. Please refer to our website at: http://support.asus.com/cpusupport/c...Language=en-us

Easy to run 2600 10-12-12-31 1T 1.65V VCCSA 1.05V VCCIO 1.05V

Hmm, I have the 4x4GB Team 2133C9 kit. I'll have to see if I can match the timings at 2600 since my 3930k can surprisingly do RAM that high.

[XBrytanX]

sweet RAM

[OC Nub]

I have the 2600c10 kit, playing with them tonight. 2700mhz+ 10-12-12-21-1t with fairly tight sub-timings 1.67vdimm.

[AVulgarPicture]

my 2600 kit will happily bench 2666 9-12-12-17 1T at 1.85v. i wouldnt be surprised if it would do the same at 1.8.

[Shiranui Gen-An]

This is nowhere near stable, but I did manage a CPU-Z validation and Super Pi 1M running two Team 2133 C9 sticks (from a quad channel kit) on my MVG and 3570k.

2800 1M.jpg

[deachus]

Playing with timings at 2600 on this new kit, gonna try max mhz next.

[andressergio]

Playing with timings at 2600 on this new kit, gonna try max mhz next.

very good mate !!!

[deachus]

Thanks Sergio! This Newegg kit wasn't to shabby. Here's Memtest 200% at 2600Mhz tight timings and also starting to play with 2800Mhz now.

HCI Memtest 5000Mhz DDR3-2600Mhz 10-12-12-20-1T 1.675vdimm



SuperPi 1M 5000Mhz DDR3-2800Mhz 11-12-12-25-1T 1.685vdimm

[andressergio]

Thanks Sergio! This Newegg kit wasn't to shabby. Here's Memtest 200% at 2600Mhz tight timings and also starting to play with 2800Mhz now.

HCI Memtest 5000Mhz DDR3-2600Mhz 10-12-12-20-1T 1.675vdimm



SuperPi 1M 5000Mhz DDR3-2800Mhz 11-12-12-25-1T 1.685vdimm

very nice Dominic !!! you see that lowering DRAM refresh MEMTWEAKIT score goes to heaven BUT AIDA shows no improvement...

impressive 2800 but u cant 24/7 with them, i can do the same but it was a pity that only for benchmarking

that aint the kit from newegg right ?