Data source: Customer reviews at www.newegg.com
Methodology: Read through all reviews with only 3 eggs or less and identify deaths / problems through review description. (When a customer has met more than 1 dead SSD, the death count is only 1, and the review count is also only 1.)
Model Review count Review timespan Total period (months) Death count Problem count (*) Review failure rate Annualized review failure rate (**) Review problem rate Intel X25-M G2 (still on sale) 232 Oct10-Oct11 12 6 2 2.59% 2.59% 0.86% Intel X25-M G2 (deactivated) 276 Jul09-Jun11 23 6 3 2.17% 1.13% 1.09% Intel 320 Series 453 Mar11-Jan12 10 29 13 6.4% 7.68% 2.87% Intel 320 Series (excluding 8MB bricks with 0302 FW) 453 Mar11-Jan12 10 12 13 2.65% 3.18% 2.87% Crucial M4 (excluding BSOD of 5184h bug) 1040 May11-Jan12 08 25 41 2.4% 3.6% 3.94% Crucial M4 (64GB and 128GB) 889 May11-Jan12 08 15 32 1.69% 2.53% 3.6% Crucial M4 (256GB and 512GB) 167 May11-Jan12 08 8 7 4.79% 7.19% 4.19% Samsung 470 280 Aug10-Jan12 17 5 2 1.79% 1.26% 0.71%
(*) Problems include BSOD, freezing / stuttering issues etc.
(**) Assume the failures are evenly distributed over the power-on hours, which is what HDD vendors quote for MTBF.
I don't want to include the OCZ models, as the effort required to read through the negative reviews would be unacceptable!
Note that the statistics for G2 is incomplete - I am unable to obtain the links for all deactivated models (if you have a collection of them please let me know!)
The numbers of M4 stratified by page size don't add up exactly for the previous stats, probably because newegg activated / deactivated some products, or there were minor counting errors.
I'm inclined to believe that the 0302 FW of the 320 Series is prone to be bricked into 8MB, and the 8kb page sized models of the Crucial M4 (i.e. 256GB and 512GB) are less reliable.
My 2 cents.
Bookmarks