Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 63 of 63

Thread: Radeon HD 7950 benchmarked, pitted against several other cards

  1. #51
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,972
    Nice thanks.

    Can i ask you if the beta driver used, 20jan is the 8.95 or 8.91 ? I find your 3Dmark11 pretty high for the 7970.
    Last edited by Lanek; 01-30-2012 at 09:14 PM.
    CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
    GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
    Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
    RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
    Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0

  2. #52
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    514
    http://www.hardocp.com/article/2012/..._card_review/1



    If we see the price drop to $399.99 or below in 60 days, we will change the award to a GOLD.

  3. #53
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Ryan from Anandtech forgot to update his XFX card's BIOS with the version that's shipping with retail cards.

  4. #54
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,972
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    Ryan from Anandtech forgot to update his XFX card's BIOS with the version that's shipping with retail cards.
    What#s the difference between both ?
    CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
    GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
    Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
    RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
    Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0

  5. #55
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Our results post retail BIOS update:




    Anandtech's results:




    Basically, XFX emailed all media days before launch stating that their retail cards had revised fan speed profiles that allowed for slightly increased temperatures but kept the fans MUCH quieter. They sent us all a the retail BIOS file with the proper speeds. What you see above are the differences between the beta and the final release BIOS.

  6. #56
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    53

  7. #57
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,972
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    Our results post retail BIOS update:

    ..........

    Basically, XFX emailed all media days before launch stating that their retail cards had revised fan speed profiles that allowed for slightly increased temperatures but kept the fans MUCH quieter. They sent us all a the retail BIOS file with the proper speeds. What you see above are the differences between the beta and the final release BIOS.
    Cant be much clear.... thanks.
    CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
    GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
    Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
    RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
    Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0

  8. #58
    Champion
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    449
    ASIC quality and overclockability analyzed between AMD HD 7950, Sapphire HD 7950 OC Edition and AMD HD 7970 here. On that link you can find also the results with AMD reference HD 7950 overclocked to 1250MHz GPU / 1750MHz memory.
    Born to lose, live to win!

  9. #59
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    100
    Finnish review muropaketti.com

  10. #60
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,970
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post

    Sapphire HD 7950 Dual Fan OC Review: http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...oc-review.html
    Shame the pricing of the whole series is so relatively high... that card looks great, but not $500 great (on newegg at the moment) for crossfire ($1k). Noise level and cooling capabilities seem nice on it. Hopefully once Kepler hits pricing on both that and it will be lower. I'd love a Kepler with that sort of HSF for SLI .

  11. #61
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Peoples Republic of Kalifornia
    Posts
    1,541
    Quote Originally Posted by zanzabar View Post
    now im not sure what 285 u were looking at, when both cards were current they were about even and the 4890 is xfire did alot better than the 285 in sli, and the 4890 oced better and scalled better with the OC.
    Umm... at high resolutions the GTX285 in SLI ran better than the hd4890 CF.

    The 285 in SLI flat out destroyed 2x 4890 in CF while running Vantage.

    "If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government"
    -- Alexander Hamilton

  12. #62
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601

  13. #63
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by Lanek View Post
    Cant be much clear.... thanks.
    I've discussed a bit more with Ryan.

    Seems I was wrong as he DID update the BIOS but it still looks like this numbers are quite high. I wonder whether the heatsink on his card is mounted well since I had to remount the cooler on my XFX HD 7970 in order to get optimal fan speeds.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •