metro and deus ex at 1600p
http://www.rage3d.com/board/showpost...&postcount=666
Umm,,, that is exactly what i was afraid of. Minimum FPS sucks badly. Lets hope thats the fresh drivers issue and not Nvidias new dynamic OC issue. Avg FPS says nothing. Minimum FPS is what counts.
I don't understand, it still beats the 7970 at 1600p in most games by the looks of it.
Minimum fps is a worthless statistic that tells you absolutely nothing about what it's like to play on the system. If you have one slowdown it completely bogs the result and will show that system a is worse than system b, yet system b could be in microshuttering hell and you'd never know it.
Last edited by Cold Fussion; 03-21-2012 at 10:51 PM.
Metro may have PhysX enabled, so that one we can't call (same result of falling back at 1920x1080 too). Deus Ex, one title it only matches the 7970 in instead of trouncing it, does not mean the card is "out of gas" at all. You're ignoring the rest of the info saying that. http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=1#post5072349
Both are important... I'm thinking more toward drivers though. Radeon 7970 has had a couple of months worth of new ones and probably eked out what it's going to performance-wise... GTX 680 is just coming out. Nvidia got some nice gains on the 5xx series, so I'm betting soon enough we'll see some boosts for 6xx as well. Speculation on my part, of course, but it seems sensible.
more
http://www.abload.de/img/1c8iu6.jpg
http://www.abload.de/img/29vidr.jpg
http://www.abload.de/img/11rleim.jpg
http://www.abload.de/img/12ykf61.jpg
http://www.abload.de/img/135yeeu.jpg
http://www.abload.de/img/14i3fp8.jpg
http://www.abload.de/img/1589fuj.jpg
http://www.abload.de/img/3tsfhy.jpg
http://www.abload.de/img/41lcpm.jpg
http://www.abload.de/img/5m1fqx.jpg
http://www.abload.de/img/6qscv0.jpg
http://www.abload.de/img/739e2n.jpg
http://www.abload.de/img/8ivcji.png
http://www.abload.de/img/9cleee.png
http://www.abload.de/img/10kvfqh.png
http://www.forum-3dcenter.org/vbulle...postcount=7521
Didn't they rip out all the GPGPU stuff in the 680 to win the die size, perf/watt, and other combos that come with that? I don't think its a big deal, just a strange move from Nvidia since all of their old X80 cards were crazy GPGPU.
Why yes, yes I do use Koolance..*Flame Wall Inbound*
All of those benchmarks are pretty solid, 7970 did win random ones at 2560 which may/may not confirm the 2GB issue. We'll see what happens when someone starts pushing this and a 7970 on LN2
Why yes, yes I do use Koolance..*Flame Wall Inbound*
I doubt it has anything to do with boost, AMD cards take the same min fps hit at the same time in the runs as the Nvidia cards and AMD has no boost to blame it on and if it where drivers is it not strange they both have the same exact issue with the same part of the game causing the fps drop.
Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810
Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830
AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
Corsair VX450
Minimum FPS tells you how consistent the framerate is between the highest and lowest frames during a section of the game. If the minimum framerate is lower, it means that the game slows down more, and that is never good. You always want the minimum framerate to be as high as possible. That ensures a smooth gameplay experience throughout. As a metric of performance, it tells you how well your system copes with the data load in the most intense conditions in that said scene.
Basically, you're dead wrong.
PII 965BE @ 3.8Ghz /|\ TRUE 120 w/ Scythe Gentle Typhoon 120mm fan /|\ XFX HD 5870 /|\ 4GB G.Skill 1600mhz DDR3 /|\ Gigabyte 790GPT-UD3H /|\ Two lovely 24" monitors (1920x1200) /|\ and a nice leather chair.
Yes, but you are missing the key point here. The cap betweeen GTX 680 max FPS vs min FPS is huge, compared to AMD card. Thats why im thinking that GPU boost is not quick enought to react. Average FPS just makes GTX to look better card, but min FPS tells the different story.
So far the GTX 680 performs close to the 7970, if not faster only about 5%. I wonder how the real flagship card will perform, which is the one I will get.
Last edited by Chrono Detector; 03-21-2012 at 11:34 PM.
AMD Threadripper 12 core 1920x CPU OC at 4Ghz | ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme X399 motherboard | 32GB G.Skill Trident RGB 3200Mhz DDR4 RAM | Gigabyte 11GB GTX 1080 Ti Aorus Xtreme GPU | SilverStone Strider Platinum 1000W Power Supply | Crucial 1050GB MX300 SSD | 4TB Western Digital HDD | 60" Samsung JU7000 4K UHD TV at 3840x2160
We were talking about an outrageously clocked 7970 Lightning at some point. I just stumbled across one on LN2 http://www.techpowerup.com/162729/MS...Hz-Memory.html
Why yes, yes I do use Koolance..*Flame Wall Inbound*
Minimum FPS are not very useful. If you have a benchmark that is 120s long and the framerate dips exactly once quite low on card A and not so low on card B, what does that tell you about general playability?
It would be much better to do something like the FEAR 1 benchmark, for example:
x% above 40
y% between 25 and 40
z% below 25
This way, you weigh the frequency of occurence of specific fps or fps intervals rathern than take only one single value that may very well have been an unrepeatable error.
Look at the min fps hit in Batman, the 680 takes the big hit once early on in the run while over the rest of the run performed very strong, you can't reasonably base a decision about game play on one instance in the entire run. If it where repeatedly hitting min fps sure it would be an issue.
Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810
Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830
AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
Corsair VX450
Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810
Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830
AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
Corsair VX450
^early driver issues?
[[Daily R!G]]
Core i7 920 D0 @ 4.0GHz w/ 1.325 vcore.
Rampage II Gene||CM HAF 932||HX850||MSI GTX 660ti PE OC||Corsair H50||G.Skill Phoenix 3 240GB||G.Skill NQ 6x2GB||Samsung 2333SW
flickr
^ The one who is wrong is you. avg fps factor in the fps during the whole benchmark, min fps only a fraction of a second. This is hardly relevant.
Well, end of discussion from me. I made my point clear and we just have different opinions here. What matters to me, doesnt matter to you.
trinibwoy, I choose my card and game settings based on one thing only. In no point of time, FPS can not fall below 35 when i play. Simple as that.
Overall im happy about 500$ price tag. That should make the card i want cheaper too perhaps. Thats 7870, what im hoping to get soon.
Last edited by Kristoferr; 03-21-2012 at 11:57 PM.
Bookmarks