2600k@4.9Ghz 1.42V | Asrock Ext 3 Gen 3 | Custom H20 | 16GB PC3 1600 | 7970@1375/1600
I think it depends. Atleast for the consumer. If nvidia and AMD performance is very similar to each other, price cuts are not a necessity. Since they perform similarly, they can be priced close to each other. Since AMD pricing is at an all time high for the company, this leaves room for very high pricing, particularly for the ultra high end. This is strictly hypothetical but if gk104 outperforms 7970 by 20% and is priced around $500 AMD would be forced to drop the price of 79xx series 100 dollars or more. The lower Nvidia pricing, the more AMD has to drop the prices of their cards. If Nvidia prices high enough of course, AMD won't have to drop prices.
Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
6gb OCZ platinum
4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
2*640 WD Blacks
750GB Seagate.
Bill Cosby: Stewie, what do you think candy is made out of?
Stewie Griffin: Sunshine and farts! What the hell kind of question is that?!
Also, I can't be the only one who gives two flying f***s about GK104. I want some top-end news on GK110.
If GK104 is the only thing they're farting out the next few months then I'll stick with my GTX580.
Bill Cosby: Stewie, what do you think candy is made out of?
Stewie Griffin: Sunshine and farts! What the hell kind of question is that?!
if GK104 beats 7970 and is cheaper then its worth a look but of course we want the big guns.
Bencher/Gamer(1) 4930K - Asus R4E - 2x R9 290x - G.skill Pi 2200c7 or Team 2400LV 4x4GB - EK Supreme HF - SR1-420 - Qnix 2560x1440
Netbox AMD 5600K - Gigabyte mitx - Aten DVI/USB/120Hz KVM
PB 1xTitan=16453(3D11), 1xGTX680=13343(3D11), 1x GTX580=8733(3D11)38000(3D06) 1x7970=12059(3D11)40000(vantage)395k(AM3) Folding for team 24
AUSTRALIAN DRAG RACING http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFsbfEIy3Yw
You really belive that this card is going to be named gtx680 and its going to be their midrange?
I dont think so.
Why not? 6870 was AMDs midrange and took the "870" from the previous fastest card, the 5870. GK110 is not ready, Nvidias midrange chip can compete with AMDs performance/highend-hybrid, so this is just marketing. GK110 probably will be the 700 series. Would make sense because it is rumored to be more capable on the shader front.
OK. But it doesnt make sense to me, neither did this AMD previous number jump. Perhaps they try to catch few more sells by giving the card the higher number, hoping that some of us will not check the card perfomance before purchase.
Well, I hope people look at performance and price and compare it to the previous gen. If it's not at least a 40% improvement in fps/$, show it the finger. At least that is what I'm gonna do.
I dont care what its called or where they think it fits in the range, if its faster and cheaper than a 7970 then its worth a look. I think its a bit unrealistic to expect a mid range card to beat the oppositions flagship, even if they could do it they wouldnt as its not economically sensible, they could charge more for something slower. Besides, when has a flagship gpu ever costed us$399??
Last edited by aussie-revhead; 03-06-2012 at 11:24 PM.
Bencher/Gamer(1) 4930K - Asus R4E - 2x R9 290x - G.skill Pi 2200c7 or Team 2400LV 4x4GB - EK Supreme HF - SR1-420 - Qnix 2560x1440
Netbox AMD 5600K - Gigabyte mitx - Aten DVI/USB/120Hz KVM
PB 1xTitan=16453(3D11), 1xGTX680=13343(3D11), 1x GTX580=8733(3D11)38000(3D06) 1x7970=12059(3D11)40000(vantage)395k(AM3) Folding for team 24
AUSTRALIAN DRAG RACING http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFsbfEIy3Yw
If hot clocks are still there than GK104 could cost higher to produce (lower yields) and consume more power than Tahiti despite having less die size.
Radeon 9700 pro was $399.
But, if nvidias midrange smokes amds high end, I would expect high prices from nvidia since amd wouldn't be able to compete performance wise. However, I think the gtx680 is the high end single card. I'm excited to see nvidias offerings in the upcoming months.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
Main Rig: i7 2600K @ 4.5ghz, Thermalright HR-02 Macho, Gigabyte Z68MA-DH2-B3, 4x4GB Gskill DDR3-1600, Visiontek Radeon 7850, OCZ Vertex 2 120GB, OCZ Agility 60GB, Silverstone TJ08B-E, Seasonic X750, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit
Fiance's Rig: Apple iMac 21.5" 2011, i5 2.5ghz, 4GB DDR3-1333, Radeon 6750m, 500GB
It better do a lot better in games then 7970, otherwise it will be disappointing to me. But if it does turn out to be the midrange chip, which seems to be the case, it will be fantastic on the other hand. A midrange chip beating the opposition's high end chip hasn't happened for a long time. GK110 better come in a decent time span though.
Intel Core i7-3770K
ASUS P8Z77-I DELUXE
EVGA GTX 970 SC
Corsair 16GB (2x8GB) Vengeance LP 1600
Corsair H80
120GB Samsung 840 EVO, 500GB WD Scorpio Blue, 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3
Corsair RM650
Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced
OC: 5Ghz | +0.185 offset : 1.352v
That was a while ago mate, those things were near double that here, I'm
Pretty a mate of mine paid near $1000 for a 9800 all in wonder ..... Ouch
Don't you worry, Nvidia will bleed us if it's really that fast, that's why they are giving it a high end name, so they can attach a high end price tag to it ..... You will see
Bencher/Gamer(1) 4930K - Asus R4E - 2x R9 290x - G.skill Pi 2200c7 or Team 2400LV 4x4GB - EK Supreme HF - SR1-420 - Qnix 2560x1440
Netbox AMD 5600K - Gigabyte mitx - Aten DVI/USB/120Hz KVM
PB 1xTitan=16453(3D11), 1xGTX680=13343(3D11), 1x GTX580=8733(3D11)38000(3D06) 1x7970=12059(3D11)40000(vantage)395k(AM3) Folding for team 24
AUSTRALIAN DRAG RACING http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFsbfEIy3Yw
What makes you think Tahiti is high end? Maybe it's a bit more than a performance card, but by current standards, it's not high end. Had they made it 450+mm2 (more units) or clocked it significantly higher, pushing thermals/power to what the market is willing to accept these days (250w), then it would deserve this classification.
If it had GTX580+60% performance@stock, no problem. Still impressive of GK104, though. That would be like the GTX560Ti competing with the 6970 when in reality it was about 10% slower than the 6950.
Same here, sort of. I am nearing my upgrade cycle time, so I want to buy new cards within the next 4, at worst 5 months (not sure I have the patience, though). And I'd rather not go for 3-Way SLI to future proof myself for the next couple of years. But if high-end Kepler is cancelled then I guess I may have to... Really rather stick to two cards tops, though.
I also don't like 2GB of VRAM. Seems barely enough for my 30 inch display even today, and who knows what's coming later on. And 4GB of VRAM would be too much, overkill and a waste of money. 3GB sounds so much better...
Last edited by zalbard; 03-07-2012 at 12:52 AM.
This could also be named 670 ? and maybe later there will be a 675 and 680 ?
http://semiaccurate.com/2012/03/07/t...nm-production/
Troll?
Bolded parts for emphasis on why I think it's little more than a troll by him. At least for the nVidia-related sections.Originally Posted by Charlie FUD-curate
Charlie again makes no sense. Nvidia is too dumb, no one else is having 28nm problems...and then suddenly a complete turnaround and ALL 28nm production, not just Nvidias, is halted. Charlie is an idiot.
Charlie, no use crying, you were not invited, 12 days, so for the Kepler selected. It was expected that level a comment coming from this guy after that Nvidia did not sent her invitation to the premiere of Kepler!
I definitely believe there was some kind of issue with 28nm when you look at how many 79xx based AMD cards are oos at NE.
Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810
Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830
AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
Corsair VX450
I am not sure you know what you are talking about. You don't cure a flu by killing the patient and reanimating him. Nothing similar happaned on 40nm either. If they needed to stop production, then it must have been a different, very serious problem, not just yields. Like machine failure, issues with chemicals, or possibly a dozen of other problems that can happen inside a fab.
SKYMTL reported earlier that AIBs have problems getting Tahiti chips and boards. Could be cause by this pause in production.
The difference between GTX 580 1.5GB and 3GB is negligible even at extreme high resolution with 4x/8x AA
http://www.hardware.fr/focus/50/test...-surround.html
In other words, even 1.5GB is more enough enough for your 30 inch display
Well that's p***** on my campfire.
Bookmarks