Seen that chart already, if it is legit, too little VRAM, again.
Seen that chart already, if it is legit, too little VRAM, again.
AMD Threadripper 12 core 1920x CPU OC at 4Ghz | ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme X399 motherboard | 32GB G.Skill Trident RGB 3200Mhz DDR4 RAM | Gigabyte 11GB GTX 1080 Ti Aorus Xtreme GPU | SilverStone Strider Platinum 1000W Power Supply | Crucial 1050GB MX300 SSD | 4TB Western Digital HDD | 60" Samsung JU7000 4K UHD TV at 3840x2160
My bad...
CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0
Nvidia better hope GK104 is good if their big chip is coming late this year. By that time AMD will be close to bringing their refresh for 7000 series.
"No, you'll warrant no villain's exposition from me."
Some more news.
The GTX 680 or it's naming equivalent(name hasn't been set in stone yet), will be based on GK104. You heard it right, they want to fight AMD high-end only with the GK104 chip. But don't worry, bigger things are still coming.
This means, that the card, that comes in April will be lower clocked, we're talking 900-950MHz, performance between 7950 and 7970 and will be after all priced at $299.
The last bit of info reveals answer to Eyefinity, which should not surprise anyone.
Do you really think nvidia can produce a vid card for $299 that AMD has to charge $550 for? Or is AMD charging this because they can (against the gtx580 RRP)? If this is the case how could they announce a 50% price cut to stay competitive? Or will they then just hang in there until the next refresh?
Bencher/Gamer(1) 4930K - Asus R4E - 2x R9 290x - G.skill Pi 2200c7 or Team 2400LV 4x4GB - EK Supreme HF - SR1-420 - Qnix 2560x1440
Netbox AMD 5600K - Gigabyte mitx - Aten DVI/USB/120Hz KVM
PB 1xTitan=16453(3D11), 1xGTX680=13343(3D11), 1x GTX580=8733(3D11)38000(3D06) 1x7970=12059(3D11)40000(vantage)395k(AM3) Folding for team 24
AUSTRALIAN DRAG RACING http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFsbfEIy3Yw
If vardant is right, this can mean Charlie last article about GK110 who have been just only tapped out can be right too. and you will not see it before Q3, end of Q3. ( Gk100 abandonned ? ). ( ofc i will wait real official infos, i cant say i trust anyone today )
The problem i see there is about performance of GK104, I really doubt Nvidia will price it 300$ if the card was enough for fight with 7950 ( in cherrypicked res, game, settings ).. Yes in some games the 7970 is just upper of the 580 (and popular games, i think to BF3 or Dirt ), in some it goes too a lot better, if AMD can pull some performance gain out of a driver in thoses games.. it will start to be really hard for Nvidia, if they dont have the high end.
I dont know why, perf of a bieffed GK104 around the 580 can looks right, so let say more or less 7950 performance ( 7950 is a bit faster, and i dont even speak about OC models, but it is not important yet )... this will put a point to this price: 7970-500$, 7950-400$, GK104-300$ ?
Thoses are performance card, and price dont have to be at 450+ , but if the GK104 is really between 7950-7970, they will fight in price with the 7950.. so 350-375-400$ .. If the point is they dont have an high end card yet, the 300$ can be too a solution, for win on "price for perf ", (and we know thoses middle range cards sell the more ).. or give a better light on this card. But i dont see a card with a so low price, between 7950 and 7970..
We cant say Nvidia have been an angel when it come to pricing his cards so, even more if they have not high end for sell, why dont put it close of the 7950price, and play the price war if needed.
About naming scheme, ( something who make me really doubt about this type of info ), marketing wise it will be completely nuts to call it GTX680, whatever is the performance, if it dont end faster, and high end should coming then, call it 6600TI and play the wait game for high end.
(again i respond to the vardant post, i dont say i trust any info yet, i mean: this + charlie post is a little bit too much suspect when they come at the same time, could be just noise. )
Last edited by Lanek; 02-08-2012 at 01:58 AM.
CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0
More likely it's somewhere around GTX580 or 7950 and priced close to 400$. If GTX 580 is really EOL like some claim, GK104 is the only thing that can replace it. Hoping for 7970 performance and 300$ price is absurd, that's simply not the way the market works, even 4800 wasn't that good of a deal. Of course if the performance is only close to 580 it might end up with a 300$ price tag if we're lucky. I think Nvidia have a good spot between 7870 and 7950 if the estimations about 7870 price and perf are true. They could price GK104 between 300-400 and AMD would have no rival there.
"No, you'll warrant no villain's exposition from me."
4670k 4.6ghz 1.22v watercooled CPU/GPU - Asus Z87-A - 290 1155mhz/1250mhz - Kingston Hyper Blu 8gb -crucial 128gb ssd - EyeFunity 5040x1050 120hz - CM atcs840 - Corsair 750w -sennheiser hd600 headphones - Asus essence stx - G400 and steelseries 6v2 -windows 8 Pro 64bit Best OS used - - 9500p 3dmark11 (one of the 26% that isnt confused on xtreme forums)
That performance level with that price is really great news, but if the performance is really between 7950 and 7970 then it's almost a GTX 580, right?
Will NVIDIA kill its current flagship card without releasing her big dog?
Though I really doubt they're going to price it at 299 bucks.
Who cares about the wording. It is late. Late to the market, late to beat the competition. It's been 15 months since GTX 580 release, and it's going to be 20 months in Q3.
Also, Nvidia isn't known for great price-performance. While GK104 may compete with 7950, it will be quite expensive if so, with GTX 580 also staying expensive (their high-end...), 7950/70 staying expensive, and 7990 being insanely expensive. And this may last till Q3 thanks to Nvidia...
Last edited by zalbard; 02-08-2012 at 05:54 AM.
Even if they where releasing the new cards today it would not greatly affect pricing, if they are faster they will be more expensive than the competing products on the high end. All we would have is expensive flagship cards from both camps without a price war, at the high end they simply don't do price wars there.
Midrange is another story, probably anything from $150-$200 is going to be the meat and potatoes of the lineup and where the line in the sand is drawn.
EDIT: If anything AMD has finally given Nvidia the market pricing ranges they would prefer to be in at the high end again, Nvidia will simply follow suit in pushing the price ceiling back up where it was in the g80 days.
Last edited by highoctane; 02-08-2012 at 07:58 AM.
Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810
Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830
AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
Corsair VX450
theres alot that we might not be able to see in the background
if nvidia launches at a high price, amd would not lower unless they see stock start piling up. what the competition is doing is not their main reason for pricing, its their own supply and demand. naturally having more cards in the high end does mean they will probably sell less, but for all we know they will still sell every card at the high price, even with competition out.
if nvidia comes out and sets their prices low, it could be because they believed they couldnt clear their stock at the higher prices, which might be due to having great supply quantities. or they are doing it knowing they earn less per card, but also undermine the competition and forcing them to earn less per card.
2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case
About it..
http://translate.google.com/translat...icherer-quelle
Well read the article too, as it is a good read coming from them, knowing they have too launch rumored spec thoses last months.
Last edited by Lanek; 02-08-2012 at 08:46 AM.
CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0
Hmm, how long 'till some fake slides start floating around?
PS: wait, let's get started
http://img716.imageshack.us/img716/7...ld68ayfkmh.jpg
PS: don't get mad, jk :P
Last edited by japamd; 02-08-2012 at 09:52 AM.
only 8.26" long, pff. i need a card atleast 10" before i can get any enjoyment out of it.
2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case
Bookmarks