I'm bored today, ... so
What do you think AMD CPU's were ment to lauch at Clock wise? and do you think AMD is still planning on a FX 8170?
Full Size
I'm bored today, ... so
What do you think AMD CPU's were ment to lauch at Clock wise? and do you think AMD is still planning on a FX 8170?
Full Size
Last edited by charged3800z24; 11-14-2011 at 09:30 AM.
~1~
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
GigaByte X570 AORUS LITE
Trident-Z 3200 CL14 16GB
AMD Radeon VII
~2~
AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2950x
Asus Prime X399-A
GSkill Flare-X 3200mhz, CAS14, 64GB
AMD RX 5700 XT
INTEL 2600K @ 4.5ghz 24/7 Corsair H100
ASUS P8Z68-V PRO
2 x CORSAIR 4GB DDR3 1600 (CL8)
4TB Seagate SATA2
SAPPHIRE 7950 (GPU 1100 | MEM 1500)
Cosmos S
Asus XONAR DX
Corsair 850W PSU
I think that 8170 will launch but shouldn't. Also, I think that 8170 will be the same core using the same slow cache and will underperform just like what has already been released.
If I were an AMD executive I would intercept this release with name and design changes to remove the present & current stigma.
M7H (1002) | i7-4790K @ 4.8ghz @ 1.366v | cache @ 4.6ghz @ 1.309v |16gb (2x8) Xtreem @ DDR3-2666 (11-13-13-35-1T) | GTX 770 | AX860 PSU
CVF-Z (2002) | FX-8350 @ 4.6ghz @ 1.4875v | cpu/nb @ 2600 @ 1.275v | ht @ 2600 | 8gb (2x4) Redlines (996997) @ DDR3-2133 (9-11-10-28-1T) | GTX570 | 850Z PSU
yes, I think, we will see 8170. There are 2 options:
1)FX 8170 will be 3.8 GHz with max turbo at 4.3 GHz
2) FX 8170 will be 3.8 GHz with max turbo at 4.5 GHz!
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
I was thinking it would be between 4ghz and 4.2 and 4.8ghz turbo. If they could refine the Glo-Fo issues or what ever all went wrong, I think that FX would have launched at higher speeds anyways. With these speed boost stock and more apps using the new instruction sets, AMD would not be in a bad spot for this chip.
~1~
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
GigaByte X570 AORUS LITE
Trident-Z 3200 CL14 16GB
AMD Radeon VII
~2~
AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2950x
Asus Prime X399-A
GSkill Flare-X 3200mhz, CAS14, 64GB
AMD RX 5700 XT
"What do you think AMD CPU's were ment to lauch at Clock wise?"
The original talk from AMD was to launch the Bulldozer processors at a starting speed of around 4GHz base, with turbo on top of that. But due to lots of issues, we got the same speeds as Phenom II.
Rig 1:
ASUS P8Z77-V
Intel i5 3570K @ 4.75GHz
16GB of Team Xtreme DDR-2666 RAM (11-13-13-35-2T)
Nvidia GTX 670 4GB SLI
Rig 2:
Asus Sabertooth 990FX
AMD FX-8350 @ 5.6GHz
16GB of Mushkin DDR-1866 RAM (8-9-8-26-1T)
AMD 6950 with 6970 bios flash
Yamakasi Catleap 2B overclocked to 120Hz refresh rate
Audio-GD FUN DAC unit w/ AD797BRZ opamps
Sennheiser PC350 headset w/ hero mod
i hope it got same price 8150 at launch
Intel Core i5 6600K + ASRock Z170 OC Formula + Galax HOF 4000 (8GBx2) + Antec 1200W OC Version
EK SupremeHF + BlackIce GTX360 + Swiftech 655 + XSPC ResTop
Macbook Pro 15" Late 2011 (i7 2760QM + HD 6770M)
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) , Huawei Nexus 6P
[history system]80286 80386 80486 Cyrix K5 Pentium133 Pentium II Duron1G Athlon1G E2180 E3300 E5300 E7200 E8200 E8400 E8500 E8600 Q9550 QX6800 X3-720BE i7-920 i3-530 i5-750 Semp140@x2 955BE X4-B55 Q6600 i5-2500K i7-2600K X4-B60 X6-1055T FX-8120 i7-4790K
I think, we will see this product in Q1 2012. As the last top FX of first generation.
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
My speculation : 3.9Ghz base,4.2Ghz/4.5Ghz half/full core Turbo.
I would say they were targeting around 3.8ghz base clocks with around 4.5ghz turbo. I forgot but I think it was anand who mentioned that they wanted atleast a 500 mhz frequency increase over thuban but that wasnt the case.
Heres hoping GLoFo fixes the process issues and they get a newer rev out asap, I want better than C2 > C3 improvements and 5.5+ clocks
i7 920@4.34 | Rampage II GENE | 6GB OCZ Reaper 1866 | 8800GT (zzz) | Corsair AX750 | Xonar Essence ST w/ 3x LME49720 | HiFiMAN EF2 Amplifier | Shure SRH840 | EK Supreme HF | Thermochill PA 120.3 | MCP355 | XSPC Reservoir | 3/8" ID Tubing
Phenom 9950BE @ 3400/2000 (CPU/NB) | Gigabyte MA790GP-DS4H | HD4850 | 4GB Corsair DHX @850 | Corsair TX650W | T.R.U.E Push-Pull
E2160 @3.06 | ASUS P5K-Pro | BFG 8800GT | 4GB G.Skill @ 1040 | 600W Tt PP
A64 3000+ @2.87 | DFI-NF4 | 7800 GTX | Patriot 1GB DDR @610 | 550W FSP
Would be a nice marketing move to release a chip with a stock frequency of 4 GHz and a turbo up to 4.5 GHz. I fear AMD might follow down Intel's Netburst path in an attempt to salvage this architecture. These fears may be unfounded if Global Foundries can get their together* and through better manufacturing processes permit Bulldozer to run more efficiently.
I wonder if there'd be any major difference if Bulldozer was manufactured on Intel's 32nm lines.
*- This is based on what I've read that Global Foundries immature process is holding back Bulldozer clocks. Hopefully Global Foundries can mature their 32nm process at a faster pace than their 45nm process.
Well we can see that in order to get pass the 4.2Ghz mark you have to bump up the vcore. By doing that power draw goes thru the roof. This is the sad state of current GloFo's 32nm node. Supposedly things are going to improve in a few months.
Good thing about BD is that there is a solid room for improvement on all fronts: IPC,clock/power, adding cores is rather straightforward with module concept-by adding 1 module to 4M chip you increase performance by 25% in parallel workloads. Piledriver improves IPC somewhat, clock/power issues are fixable by GloFo(or so we are told) and adding more modules is a given(at least for server segment where we have 10C/5M Sepang and 20C/10M Terramar ).
I can imagine how much power this CPU will suck if it has a high stock speed of like 3.8 or 3.9 Ghz, unless if AMD made a new stepping for this CPU and reduced the power load but overall I wouldn't even touch this CPU at all.
AMD Threadripper 12 core 1920x CPU OC at 4Ghz | ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme X399 motherboard | 32GB G.Skill Trident RGB 3200Mhz DDR4 RAM | Gigabyte 11GB GTX 1080 Ti Aorus Xtreme GPU | SilverStone Strider Platinum 1000W Power Supply | Crucial 1050GB MX300 SSD | 4TB Western Digital HDD | 60" Samsung JU7000 4K UHD TV at 3840x2160
I should get me a watt meter and see what happens on my chip. I can do 4.4ghz stock v's with stock cooler and bench and do anything else, even ran WCG for a half day. Temps were through the roof though. I am curious how much more power the chip draws with just clock increase...
Gomeler
I agree, Intel's 32nm line is looking loads better than Glo-Fo. I wonder if they can get the process ironed out, how much it would improve FX's positioning.
Great comments everyone!
~1~
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
GigaByte X570 AORUS LITE
Trident-Z 3200 CL14 16GB
AMD Radeon VII
~2~
AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2950x
Asus Prime X399-A
GSkill Flare-X 3200mhz, CAS14, 64GB
AMD RX 5700 XT
maybe next problem could be, not only 32nm is for GF(AMD) new, but BD is new. Intel tetsing new architectures at older process and after refresh going with lower process.
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
We could get off our behinds and look at CPU Power| CPU Freq | Temp and do a little math. Hey we could even crowd source it if people would just spring for kill-a-watts. Use TDP as a proxy for Cinebench @ stock frequency; subtract out total power @ wall and that gives you your non-CPU power perhaps. I'm curious how SB-E fares as well. What is the peak power/Cinebench for SB-E (e.g. SB-E @ 5.2GHz @ -30c which seems to be near tops)?
Last edited by 64NOMIS; 11-17-2011 at 10:24 PM.
|| Notch Interfaces || Sixense Entertainment || Tagaboom || Sixense STEM Kickstarter ||
~1~
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
GigaByte X570 AORUS LITE
Trident-Z 3200 CL14 16GB
AMD Radeon VII
~2~
AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2950x
Asus Prime X399-A
GSkill Flare-X 3200mhz, CAS14, 64GB
AMD RX 5700 XT
i read that sandybridge-E has die size of 435mm.
also that it's highest TDP is 150 watts.
|| Notch Interfaces || Sixense Entertainment || Tagaboom || Sixense STEM Kickstarter ||
Bookmarks