G.Skill RipjawsZ F3-19200-CL9Q-16GBZHD

**Pt1t** · 11-13-2011, 08:48 AM

Here are some pictures of the new G.Skill RipjawsZ F3-19200-CL9Q-16GBZHD

**l0ud_sil3nc3** · 11-13-2011, 09:14 AM

very nice kit but pricing ($650) seems a bit high, can't wait to see what they do though.

**Counter CS** · 11-13-2011, 02:25 PM

Looks like it will be dificult to use many of actual air cooling on the market.

I dont expect much OC frome that setup, with 16GB... lets see how it will go.

**youngpro** · 11-13-2011, 06:07 PM

nice Thomas, looking forward to seeing what you can do with these

**Mungri** · 11-13-2011, 10:46 PM

Just a thing I wondered .... how would I fit a CPU cooler onto there o.O

**Pt1t** · 11-14-2011, 01:14 AM

without turbulence II FANS

, with watercooling it s OK.

**Pt1t** · 11-14-2011, 02:42 AM

with this combo R4E+3960x+RipjawsZ , 16GB 2400Mhz+ works fine

**Dumo** · 01-15-2013, 07:10 PM

Thanks Sam

Been looking for this Pt1t's thread

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

**TaPaKaH** · 01-15-2013, 07:49 PM

Now that we're in the right thread, let me post my own results from this kit while I had it for review last summer

How does your kit run at CL10 on M5E, Dumo?
When I tried mine on the Z77X-UD3H, there was a noticable voltage difference between CL9 and CL10, at least up to 1250MHz which was then the limit of my platform.
But later on the Gene it did the same with CL9 as it did with CL10 at 1300MHz+

**l0ud_sil3nc3** · 01-15-2013, 11:42 PM

testing the sister sticks to Dumo's

1.65v

**Don_Dan** · 01-16-2013, 03:39 AM

Wow, those BFR are performing very well. Nice work guys!

**Dumo** · 01-17-2013, 12:14 AM

@Sam...This kit kinda difficult with C10 @2666~2800

Still playing with it

**l0ud_sil3nc3** · 01-17-2013, 05:57 AM

Originally Posted by Dumo

@Sam...This kit kinda difficult with C10 @2666~2800

Still playing with it

^difficult is not the word for this

will post results under cold shortly.

**l0ud_sil3nc3** · 01-17-2013, 11:39 AM

so Hynix BFR was not working well for me this time, IMC could not run 2600+ with any sort of decent timings and even though I was able to boot at 2856+ there was no semblance of 32m stability whatsoever, pretty sure it is the IMC on this particular chip. Memory temps were -40 to -50.

1.925v

mandatory frostiness

Going back to PSC

**Shiranui Gen-An** · 01-17-2013, 01:39 PM

I wonder if BFR just doesn't want to go much higher than 1200MHz...?

**TaPaKaH** · 01-17-2013, 01:53 PM

My kit is the actual one recently used for 1900MHz+ frequency records so the only issue of BFR seems high-freq stability.

**l0ud_sil3nc3** · 01-17-2013, 04:27 PM

^these are my cpu valid dimms, about all they are good for in my hands lol

**Dumo** · 02-06-2013, 09:47 PM

Just got the lil' bro 2133..

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

**Shiranui Gen-An** · 02-07-2013, 12:39 PM

That's crazy. I had that same kit (240=CFR) and they couldn't do that. One stick ended up dying and the RMA replacement I got were Samsung (340).

**xdan** · 02-07-2013, 01:42 PM

It's BFR, look above at 2400C9 modules same 240 mark.
240 from what i know it's for Hynix not specified what BFR or CFR.
It must be the best CFR to do 2600 CL 10-12-11 with 1.63v.
And usualy CFR doesnt work well with tRP = tRCD-1, this is a BFR specific comportament.
See this review to:
http://www.ocaholic.ch/xoops/html/mo...mid=774&page=1

**TaPaKaH** · 02-07-2013, 04:14 PM

All depends on how CFR are binned.

Originally Posted by xdan

And usualy CFR doesnt work well with tRP = tRCD-1, this is a BFR specific comportament.

...the key word here is "usually".
From my experience, tRCD and tRP scaling on CFR seem be independent and vary a lot from kit to kit hence all kinds of "works best at" tRCD/tRP are possible, from tRCD=tRP+1 to tRCD=tRP+3.
BFR are a lot more consistent at tRCD=tRP+1 in this matter.

For example, Geil based their 2400 11-11-11 stuff on CFR (even though using Samsung would make a lot more sense) so the toughest part of the spec was doing 1200MHz at tRCD 11. The kit I had could do 1300 10-12-11 but was not as good on voltage as Dumo's one.

**Shiranui Gen-An** · 02-07-2013, 08:06 PM

Originally Posted by TaPaKaH

For example, Geil based their 2400 11-11-11 stuff on CFR (even though using Samsung would make a lot more sense) so the toughest part of the spec was doing 1200MHz at tRCD 11. The kit I had could do 1300 10-12-11 but was not as good on voltage as Dumo's one.

Some of it actually is Samsung: http://www.overclockers.ru/lab/47582...on_HyperX.html