I dont believe this. G34 will be server socket, Vishera in desktop at AM3+ (990FX or maybe 1090FX).
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
1090FX will come with USB3.0 integrated,several tweaks maybe,but no pci-ex 3.0...
piledriver cores using the same cores as trinity?
There are some results in 3dMark11 of a supposed Trinity eng sample(1D32246W4K44_38/32/22_2/8):
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/2417633
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/2584681
but this GPU is what???? This can not be 7950 radeon...
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
Finally! i was thinking about the G34 option too!!!
it has what AMD needs against Intel 2011 socket
Quad channel Memory with 8 Dims!
and you can get up too 10~16 cores like in servers!
and G34 platform not so expensive! you can get single socket MB for less then 300$
My Photoshop Images!
Last edited by hwgeek; 01-23-2012 at 01:13 PM.
Lol
FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
OCZ ZX 850w psu
Lian-Li Lancool K62
Samsung 830 128g
2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
Win7 Home 64bit
My Rig
without L3 cache, the core logic is the same between Trinity and second generation FX(Komodo/Vishera).
I find another one.
http://wccftech.com/amd-trinity-a8-e...-11-benchmark/
the graphic score is kidding me right?
Update: someones find out the CPUID is for 8 physical cores, which represent an ES FX with 4 cores disabled.
http://www.planet3dnow.de/vbulletin/...&postcount=751
http://www.planet3dnow.de/vbulletin/...&postcount=754
(pls translate by yourself)
seem to be fake.
result is from Mister O..B.......
Last edited by undone; 01-24-2012 at 02:25 AM.
thx for link
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
You don't need to look at the Physics test It's misleading, you won't know how It really performs.
Here are two link with the same CPU(APU) and look at the physics score
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/2584681
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/2417633
The difference is 11.5% for the same cpu(apu)
I found an interesting comparison for this test on the same cpu but different gpus
http://www.lostcircuits.com/mambo//i...1&limitstart=2
P.S. It's not even sure this is a Trinity
Last edited by TESKATLIPOKA; 01-24-2012 at 02:30 AM.
Physics test is just not good metric for comparison since it varies wildly with different graphics cards(as the LS link above demonstrates). Not to mention that in 2 instances of Trinity 3dmark11 runs we have 2 scores that are more than 10% apart... This tells us that either the user OCed or down-clocked the chip or something else was responsible for the discrepancy.
PS Never mind that dumb OBR didn't see the freaking title of the 3dmark11 which has Radeon 7950 listed as a GPU. He thinks this is the iGPU in Trinity... Yeah right,3x faster than Llano while AMD officially said 30% better on desktop. Not even a magic pixie could make Trinity's iGPU 3x faster. But hey,he is "good old" OBR
Attachment 123808
EDIT: image y u show up as attachment, y u no?!
Last edited by Smartidiot89; 01-25-2012 at 09:31 AM.
SweClockers.com
CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
GPU: HD 5770
I doubt any IPC increase and only a decrease in power.
what applications? game? compare to what? llano or bdver1 or deneb? and btw i'm fed up with hearing any comment or complain about IPC, let's say 'performance per clock' rather than IPC, ok? cuz these two are different.
Which means higher clock is possible. Certainly higher clock with lower power is much impressive than just lower power with same clock. need to wait and see.and only a decrease in power.
-----unrelated message----
anyone see FX-8170(or second wave of bdver1) news or rumor?
There's an ETA for piledriver yet? 6 months from now? 1 year?
Thanks.
I have no idea how fast the Piledriver core might be over Bulldozer, but I expect a decent rise in clock speed for Trinity over Llano- the A10 should end up at 3.6G atleast.
Current info talks of Mid-2012 launch - whether that means April-May or September I have no clue.
Va fail, dh'oine.
"I am going to hunt down people who have strong opinions on subjects they dont understand " - Dogbert
Always rooting for the underdog ...
I am thinking about getting a unlocked Trinity and OCing the hell out of it, if its not as power hungry as bulldozer.
Coming Soon
so Llano is awesome, and trinity will wipe the floor with it <3
I like large posteriors and I cannot prevaricate
Bookmarks