Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 91

Thread: FX 6100 Oh torture me ,yes its wierd and spooky and clocks up ta 5000mhz no prob.

  1. #26
    On the rise!
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,008
    Good or no?

  2. #27
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    US, MI
    Posts
    1,680
    I've read some stuff about these new cpu's but jee wiz...
    I mean, clocked up to 5ghz is lower perf then a stock clocked older gen cpu wth..
    I'm glad I got what I got, if i would of waited for new 8 cores man oh man I would of been pissed...

    Sorry for hijacking the thread, just after seeing those comparison screens I'm still wondering wth happened with the bios engineer department at amd, peeps forgot how to tweak the cpu timings I guess...
    I read something about it's core's actually being half of what it's stated to be.
    HT to be more specific.
    If it's getting the performance that it is now then it's doing ok but, I dn, whatever I guess.

  3. #28
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    6,421
    4.5GHz with 1.47 is not that great for a FX cpu. My 8 core bulldozer runs Prime at 4630 with 1.41V
    Asus Crosshair V Formula-Z | FX 8350 | 2x4GB Trident-X 2600 C10 | 2x ATI HD5870 Crossfire | Enermax Revo 1050watt | OCZ Vertex 3 60GB | Samsung F1 1TB

    Watercooling: XSPC Raystorm | EK 5870 Delrin fullcover | TFC X-changer 480 w/ 4x Gentle Typhoon | DDC2+ Delrin top | EK 200mm res | Primochill LRT 3/8 tubing

    Case: Murdermodded TJ-07

    sub 9 sec. SPi1M 940BE 955BE 965BE 1090T

  4. #29
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    great will be with 4800 MHZ or more
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  5. #30
    On the rise!
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,008
    Quote Originally Posted by Zeus View Post
    4.5GHz with 1.47 is not that great for a FX cpu. My 8 core bulldozer runs Prime at 4630 with 1.41V
    What about 4Ghz with less than stock volts?

  6. #31
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    6,421
    Not impressive to me but i've you're gonna run that as a daily setting it might be of interest for you. High clocks impress me a lot more than low volts.
    Asus Crosshair V Formula-Z | FX 8350 | 2x4GB Trident-X 2600 C10 | 2x ATI HD5870 Crossfire | Enermax Revo 1050watt | OCZ Vertex 3 60GB | Samsung F1 1TB

    Watercooling: XSPC Raystorm | EK 5870 Delrin fullcover | TFC X-changer 480 w/ 4x Gentle Typhoon | DDC2+ Delrin top | EK 200mm res | Primochill LRT 3/8 tubing

    Case: Murdermodded TJ-07

    sub 9 sec. SPi1M 940BE 955BE 965BE 1090T

  7. #32
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Athens , Greece
    Posts
    71
    Hmmm.FX6100 4.5GHz 1.45V stock air cooling..Amd Overdrive shows 54+oC but Coretemp shows 45-47oC..Which one do I believe? :p
    i7 2600K | Z77 | R9 290 | 8GB 1866MHz | 840 EVO 120GB | EVGA Supernova 850W

  8. #33
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,103
    Quote Originally Posted by gregorisvas View Post
    Hmmm.FX6100 4.5GHz 1.45V stock air cooling..Amd Overdrive shows 54+oC but Coretemp shows 45-47oC..Which one do I believe? :p
    I use a dvom with temp sensor placed at the IHS..Most of the time im with in +or - two degrees when using core temp. Im still running 5000mhz and 1.6v volts

    I do have very good water cooling.
    I havnt had much free time to tweak the 6100 in last couple of weeks but they can handle voltage if cooled right .
    Its not the fastest chip , its definatly a fun clocker.
    As for volts( stock)up to 1.48v = 4600mhz/4800mhz with my set up. After that i gotta give it 1.53v+ for 5000+mhz and 1.58v for 5100/5200mhz ..this is what is needed for the vdroop my mobo has.
    Last edited by gOtVoltage; 11-22-2011 at 02:12 AM.
    "AMD...Like the perfect Storm,...Everything needs to be just right"
    X555x4SuperCore@4450mhz@1.64v..........

    RYZEN 7 1800x/ ASUS ROG STRIX VEGA64/ =EK NICKEL WB, Feser THC 2x360 1x480
    X470 Gigabyte Aorus7, Patriot 3400mhz 16gb dual2x8
    SSD Samsung 970pro,,860EVO

  9. #34
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    215
    I see this chip OC well. How does it do in gaming with CFX?

    Currently here in South Africa this the only FX we can get

  10. #35
    On the rise!
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,008
    Quote Originally Posted by Swanie View Post
    I see this chip OC well. How does it do in gaming with CFX?

    Currently here in South Africa this the only FX we can get
    I get an average of 110fps in BF3 OC'd to 4.255Ghz and a GTX570 @ stock.

  11. #36
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    215
    Thanks for the reply. So for gaming this chip is good. Currently using a X4 965 @ 3800mhz so wanna upgrade

  12. #37
    Xtreme 3D Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,499
    Quote Originally Posted by Swanie View Post
    Thanks for the reply. So for gaming this chip is good. Currently using a X4 965 @ 3800mhz so wanna upgrade
    You need the FX 6100 over 4.6 Ghz if you are thinking about gaming...single thread performance is very poor on this architecture and multithreaded scaling in games as well as GPU is very limited due to CPU bottleneck.

    I'd just bump the clockspeed to 4-4.2 Ghz, it would be better than the 6 core FX chip. If you are able to get a hold of a 6 core Phenom II chip and overclock near 4 Ghz as well it will be a much better gaming chip than the FX-6100 (you'd need 5 Ghz+ to improve on it, not going to happen).
    Last edited by BeepBeep2; 11-24-2011 at 09:51 PM.
    Smile

  13. #38
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    215
    Quote Originally Posted by BeepBeep2 View Post
    You need the FX 6100 over 4.6 Ghz if you are thinking about gaming...single thread performance is very poor on this architecture and multithreaded scaling in games as well as GPU is very limited due to CPU bottleneck.

    I'd just bump the clockspeed to 4-4.2 Ghz, it would be better than the 6 core FX chip. If you are able to get a hold of a 6 core Phenom II chip and overclock near 4 Ghz as well it will be a much better gaming chip than the FX-6100 (you'd need 5 Ghz+ to improve on it, not going to happen).
    Yes i can get hold of the 6core Phenom II, Either 1090T or 1100T but here they the same price is the BD FX 8120( we dont have stock yet).

  14. #39
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Aland Islands, Finland
    Posts
    1,137
    Quote Originally Posted by Swanie View Post
    Yes i can get hold of the 6core Phenom II, Either 1090T or 1100T but here they the same price is the BD FX 8120( we dont have stock yet).
    The FX-8xxx is really the only BD chips worth getting. The Phenom II x6's are a solid choice otherwise. I wouldn't bother with the 1100t as the lower x6 models seem to clock just as good nowadays.
    Asus Crosshair IV Extreme
    AMD FX-8350
    AMD ref. HD 6950 2Gb x 2
    4x4Gb HyperX T1
    Corsair AX1200
    3 x Alphacool triple, 2 x Alphacool ATXP 6970/50, EK D5 dual top, EK Supreme HF

  15. #40
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    215
    Seems i Will be holding onto my 965 till the BD Fx-81xx become available

  16. #41
    Xtreme 3D Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,499
    Quote Originally Posted by Swanie View Post
    Seems i Will be holding onto my 965 till the BD Fx-81xx become available
    Even then, it wouldn't be an upgrade in gaming performance over X6.
    Smile

  17. #42
    On the rise!
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,008
    I was getting an average of 66fps with the 955 OC'd to 3.8Ghz, and with the FX6100 OC'd to 4.255Ghz am getting an average of 110fps. Seems like a pretty good jump to me! I realize the human eye can only see up to 60fps. But even still the FX6100 was a pretty good performance boost for me. However my 955 was a C2 stepping and it took me several weeks of tuning to get it stable at 3.8Ghz and with the FX6100, it only took a few minutes to get it stable at 4.2Ghz. Still can't get the NB to play nicely @ 2600. No matter what I do it won't stay stable for more than 10 minutes prime. May be heat as my RAM is @ 2200mhz.

  18. #43
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,103
    Quote Originally Posted by m411b View Post
    I was getting an average of 66fps with the 955 OC'd to 3.8Ghz, and with the FX6100 OC'd to 4.255Ghz am getting an average of 110fps. Seems like a pretty good jump to me! I realize the human eye can only see up to 60fps. But even still the FX6100 was a pretty good performance boost for me. However my 955 was a C2 stepping and it took me several weeks of tuning to get it stable at 3.8Ghz and with the FX6100, it only took a few minutes to get it stable at 4.2Ghz. Still can't get the NB to play nicely @ 2600. No matter what I do it won't stay stable for more than 10 minutes prime. May be heat as my RAM is @ 2200mhz.
    The fx's like ram freqency over NB freqency... I have yet to go over 2700nb no matter what i do .I believe it has to do with Bios ram timings in my case. I really can t complain. Im now running all Ram slots laoded . before i was only using two. added four more gigs and didnt have to raise any voltages at the same clocks. I will be trying the new F7 bios soon and a 6950 for some fun. Im even tempted to run dual 6850's if the price is right. My 5750's are tired lol.
    "AMD...Like the perfect Storm,...Everything needs to be just right"
    X555x4SuperCore@4450mhz@1.64v..........

    RYZEN 7 1800x/ ASUS ROG STRIX VEGA64/ =EK NICKEL WB, Feser THC 2x360 1x480
    X470 Gigabyte Aorus7, Patriot 3400mhz 16gb dual2x8
    SSD Samsung 970pro,,860EVO

  19. #44
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10,374
    NB speed is mainly temp related... no setting will save you besides cold...

    Quote Originally Posted by m411b View Post
    I was getting an average of 66fps with the 955 OC'd to 3.8Ghz, and with the FX6100 OC'd to 4.255Ghz am getting an average of 110fps. Seems like a pretty good jump to me! I realize the human eye can only see up to 60fps. But even still the FX6100 was a pretty good performance boost for me.
    Detail setting for 110FPS average on BF3 ?
    Last edited by Leeghoofd; 11-26-2011 at 01:28 AM.
    Question : Why do some overclockers switch into d*ckmode when money is involved

    Remark : They call me Pro Asus Saaya yupp, I agree

  20. #45
    On the rise!
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,008
    Quote Originally Posted by Leeghoofd View Post
    NB speed is mainly temp related... no setting will save you besides cold... Detail setting for 110FPS average on BF3 ?
    I think High for everything, whatever the step under Ultra is. It will still do Ultra @ 60 though.

  21. #46
    On the rise!
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,008
    Quote Originally Posted by gOtVoltage View Post
    The fx's like ram freqency over NB freqency... I have yet to go over 2700nb no matter what i do .I believe it has to do with Bios ram timings in my case. I really can t complain. Im now running all Ram slots laoded . before i was only using two. added four more gigs and didnt have to raise any voltages at the same clocks. I will be trying the new F7 bios soon and a 6950 for some fun. Im even tempted to run dual 6850's if the price is right. My 5750's are tired lol.
    This seems to be my problem as well. All in all, I'm not going to go as far to say I'm impressed. But I'm not unhappy with the performance of the new chips. Now to get Gigabyte to straighten out the BIOS. F7 is an epic fail! It fixed C&Q, and CPB, but destroyed the vcore! Set it to 1.45v in BIOS and get 1.36v in windows, with vdroop, it goes down to 1.29v under load. I have to have it set this way to make the chip stable @ stock speeds with stock vcore. If I set the vcore to normal in BIOS, I get 1.18v in windows, and nothing is stable. F6 was much better even with it's C&Q, and CPB problems.

  22. #47
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,103
    Quote Originally Posted by Swanie View Post
    Thanks for the reply. So for gaming this chip is good. Currently using a X4 965 @ 3800mhz so wanna upgrade

    For gaming its worth the upgrade with the ability to Clock like mad.

    This chip clocks way different than the 965 and will like high freqency ram with 2600 or below NB..
    I had douts at first when i started seeing Sandra and other bench marks. When i started playing and noticing how i had higher fps and could multi task with teamspeak and downloading files all while gaming and listing to my favorite Tune. I was like yup my 555x4 just got powned.

    Upgraded from a X4 @ 4200mhz and i noticed a differance, even when using the FX at stock clocks. The chip might not be fast compute wise but it seems to load and run all my apps ands games very nice. It does run well at 5000mhz with xfire..Even with a single card youll notice the Higher clocks this cpu can manage. It all helps your fps .

    Note: FX6100 = 3cores with two compute units per core. they should have labled it a Tripple....and the *'s a quad!

    The real Bonus,Use higher freqency for CPU Clocks with High ram freqency to make this chip happen.

    This Six Shooter is fun..now a EightOneTwentynade is only $149 .
    "AMD...Like the perfect Storm,...Everything needs to be just right"
    X555x4SuperCore@4450mhz@1.64v..........

    RYZEN 7 1800x/ ASUS ROG STRIX VEGA64/ =EK NICKEL WB, Feser THC 2x360 1x480
    X470 Gigabyte Aorus7, Patriot 3400mhz 16gb dual2x8
    SSD Samsung 970pro,,860EVO

  23. #48
    Xtreme 3D Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,499
    Quote Originally Posted by gOtVoltage View Post
    Upgraded from a X4 @ 4200mhz and i noticed a differance, even when using the FX at stock clocks.
    That my friend, is a placebo effect.

    Overclocked can be a different story depending how high you can get it but even then, single thread is slower.
    Smile

  24. #49
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    215
    Thanks for all the replies. Now the question in front on me is get a FX6100 now or wait till 15Dec and hopefully get a FX 81XX.

  25. #50
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,103
    If you can hold out a few more weeks, get a FX81xx. pricess are dropping fast and thus will be a better option than the 6100 hands down .
    "AMD...Like the perfect Storm,...Everything needs to be just right"
    X555x4SuperCore@4450mhz@1.64v..........

    RYZEN 7 1800x/ ASUS ROG STRIX VEGA64/ =EK NICKEL WB, Feser THC 2x360 1x480
    X470 Gigabyte Aorus7, Patriot 3400mhz 16gb dual2x8
    SSD Samsung 970pro,,860EVO

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •