What I'm about to deal with here is comparing 2CU/4C and 4CU/4C Bulldozers.
(CU stands for Compute Unit, or equivalently 'Module')
It can be an excuse for Bulldozer's initial poor single-thread performance:
benchmark tools are just under-optimized for that kind of architecture, but not virtually a 'poor' performance if some optimization is done.

Here's the test scheme: I'm sure that everybody understand what these pics meaning for.

Click image for larger version. 

Name:	11_bulldozer.png 
Views:	22298 
Size:	105.5 KB 
ID:	121155
(4M/8C)

Click image for larger version. 

Name:	bulldozer_die.jpg 
Views:	21987 
Size:	204.2 KB 
ID:	121156
(real die: do they seems likely?)

Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2c4t_1.png 
Views:	21597 
Size:	101.6 KB 
ID:	121157
(2M/4C: traditional manner for AMD)

Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4c4t_1.png 
Views:	21869 
Size:	96.6 KB 
ID:	121158
(4M/4C: conceptual diagram)

But there's a flaw: current version of CH5F BIOS doesn's support core-by-core on/off. Am I finished then?

Click image for larger version. 

Name:	original.jpg 
Views:	21461 
Size:	124.9 KB 
ID:	121159

...Not really. Newest version of BIOS supports such function!

Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2c4t.jpg 
Views:	21463 
Size:	127.0 KB 
ID:	121160
Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4c4t.jpg 
Views:	22989 
Size:	136.9 KB 
ID:	121161

Here's the result:

Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ctc_01_fritz.png 
Views:	25338 
Size:	52.7 KB 
ID:	121162
Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ctc_02_wprime.png 
Views:	25665 
Size:	52.7 KB 
ID:	121163
Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ctc_03_winrar.png 
Views:	23299 
Size:	52.4 KB 
ID:	121164
Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ctc_04_3d06.png 
Views:	22610 
Size:	52.5 KB 
ID:	121165
Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ctc_05_3dv.png 
Views:	23843 
Size:	52.6 KB 
ID:	121166

▲ (there are six more results. I'll attach a reply to this thread)