So, BD is just another cpu in the market? A dissapointed cpu?
That's sad since i was really waiting a serious competition head to head with Intel, looks like my hands will have a sb or sb-e cpu soon.
Sent from my Android using TapaTalk
So, BD is just another cpu in the market? A dissapointed cpu?
That's sad since i was really waiting a serious competition head to head with Intel, looks like my hands will have a sb or sb-e cpu soon.
Sent from my Android using TapaTalk
SAINT19
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.". Albert Einstein.
Max overclock archived, 1090T @ 6.5GHz
Phenom II X6 1090T BE @ 3.8GHz and NB @ 3000MHz both with 1.325V on BIOS
Gigabyte 890FXA-UD5 Rev. 2.0 with F4 BIOS
Crucial Ballistix Tracer 4GB (2x2GB) DDR3 1600 8-8-8-21-1T
MSI GTX 680 Lightning 2GB
Corsair Force GT 120GB SSD + Hitachi 2x500GB HDD
EK Supreme HF Full Nickel + MCP655-D5 + MCR320-QP
This is just bad. This makes zero business sense and the CEO should be fired...oh wait. The clock for clock page on hardware Cannucks between the Phenom II vs BD where the BD only wins 1 category (15%) yet loses 10-15 other ones by a margin as much as 80%...people were right when they said yesterday AMD should have just tweaked the most recent core, added cash, and done a die shrink. BD is basically worse than its predecessor in every category except a few categories. It is like AMD never heard of the netburst fiasco.
*insert I am disappoint*
--Intel i5 3570k 4.4ghz (stock volts) - Corsair H100 - 6970 UL XFX 2GB - - Asrock Z77 Professional - 16GB Gskill 1866mhz - 2x90GB Agility 3 - WD640GB - 2xWD320GB - 2TB Samsung Spinpoint F4 - Audigy-- --NZXT Phantom - Samsung SATA DVD--(old systems Intel E8400 Wolfdale/Asus P45, AMD965BEC3 790X, Antec 180, Sapphire 4870 X2 (dead twice))
Hi,
here you have in Italian review
Link: http://www.techstation.it/hardware/a...e/introduzione
Bye
Alex
MOA 2010 EU finals #3
GOOC 2010 Italy #2
GOOC 2009 Italy #1 Tech Station - Italian technology website
This is why over hyping a product is not a good idea.
I still think its looking to be a decent option for the price depending on what you use it for.
Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810
Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830
AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
Corsair VX450
Competition ranking;
2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)
Spectating;
2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!
Anantech and Techpowerup did not publish anything yet ...
Motherboard: GigaByte P67UD4 f6 | CPU: Intel 2500k 4.5ghz 1.26v | Memory: GSkill 2x4gb @ 1600mhz 1.34v | PSU: SeaSonic X650 Gold 650W | Video: AMD 6970 Koolance water block 880c/1450mem 1.035v | HDD: WD 640gb cavier black: VelociRaptor 300gb: Intel x-25 g2 80gb | Sound: Asus xonar D1 | OS: W7 64bit
Phenom I was crap. Phenom II was actually pretty good.
History repeating itself once again it seems... piledriver should clean up this mess.
vrzone is my favorite
http://vr-zone.com/articles/amd-fx-8.../13694-12.html
Man, read a hand full of reviews and Hardware Heaven came off are seriously bias. They are telling it as if it was best thing since sliced bread
Feedanator 7.0
CASE:R5|PSU:850G2|CPU:i7 6850K|MB:x99 Ultra|RAM:8x4 2666|GPU:980TI|SSD:BPX256/Evo500|SOUND:2i4/HS8
LCD:XB271HU|OS:Win10|INPUT:G900/K70 |HS/F:H115i
Not at all of course, and I genuinely think AMD (or at least its marketing and commercial) expected this architecture to deliver more IPC and 35% faster performance than previous gen. However IMO something went terribly wrong or was hugely overseen with the engineering of the new core (maybe why Bergman left?) which caused this huge failure.
I don't think AMD expected BD to suck and decided to call it "FX" anyway.
Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
G-Skill Ripjaws X 16Gb - 2133Mhz
Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme
i7 2600k @ 4.4Ghz
Sapphire 7970 OC 1.2Ghz
Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 128Gb
So, instead of Intel getting Athlon'd AMD got Netburst'd?
JF-AMD / Hans de Vries / informal posting: IPC increases!!!!!!! How many times did I tell you!!!
terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
.....}
until (12th October 2011)
Looking at the OC power consumption numbers, I can see this thing nuking some "supporting" mobos like the Phenom did when it was first released. I mean wow...
I'm pretty sure Piledriver will need more than a damned 10% increase to fix this mess.
Basically goes like this:
30-40% lower IPC than Phenom II X4 in some applications, ~5-10% estimate less than K8 90nm Windsor X2's from 2006 IPC wise.
5-10% more power consumption than Thuban, let alone Phenom II X4 which consumes much less than Thuban.
5-10% performance hit in multi-threaded applications over Thuban due to absolutely ty IPC.
Better OC headroom than Thuban, but who gives a when 4.6 Ghz uses 200% more power than stock.
Thuban OC - ~4.2 Ghz...
FX OC - ~4.8(Will it even get that far?) In MT Thuban will be very close in performance most likely at lower power consumption, ST it will still win some applications. However, by the time you get up in 4.8 Ghz land you are pushing 30% more power over Thuban.
This is while on a shrunk process which in Theory should have given 30% less power consumption at Thuban performance. 60% less efficient, is this CPU.
If we can get a 40% IPC increase retaining same clocks or clock up to 6 Ghz on air with Piledriver maybe I will consider.
Last edited by BeepBeep2; 10-11-2011 at 08:52 PM.
Smile
FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
OCZ ZX 850w psu
Lian-Li Lancool K62
Samsung 830 128g
2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
Win7 Home 64bit
My Rig
Competition ranking;
2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)
Spectating;
2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!
One hundred years from now It won't matter
What kind of car I drove What kind of house I lived in
How much money I had in the bank Nor what my cloths looked like.... But The world may be a little better Because, I was important In the life of a child.
-- from "Within My Power" by Forest Witcraft
I wonder how many fruit baskets Intel has sent the new CEO of AMD for this debacle ?
All those people [s]waiting[/s] expecting something better than their older CPU from AMD... well, they all just went to intel's camp.
All is not lost though, they can still make this launch better, just lower the price about $50, and most people will be OK with it.
As for that certain person who falsely kept people's hopes up...
www.MessenTools.com-emoticones-humor-106.gif
Bookmarks