So how do you explain those occasions where the *much* faster cpu at low res has the tables turned at loses by a couple of frames at higher resolution? Nehalem was notorious for this for a long time, losing at high resolution to the 940 BE. If it's always faster, why was it losing so many at highest res? Maybe a different kind of bottleneck is starting to show, one that moves the fps in favour of the AMD chip at actual gaming (ie gpu bound) resolutions?
If SB is 50% faster at low res all the time, stands to reason it should be at least 1% faster at high res all the time, right? We'll see.
Bookmarks