so Finally We can say the Bulldozer is A big fail ?
For the sake of objectivity, I wouldn't make any such claims until the 12th.
Feedanator 7.0
CASE:R5|PSU:850G2|CPU:i7 6850K|MB:x99 Ultra|RAM:8x4 2666|GPU:980TI|SSD:BPX256/Evo500|SOUND:2i4/HS8
LCD:XB271HU|OS:Win10|INPUT:G900/K70 |HS/F:H115i
This is actually better:
https://join.me/743-658-418
Amen, although the review seems more legit than most early early ones... it wouldn't be the first time for a relaunch review with completely flubbed results that were massively skewed against or for the product.
Only reason I'm not screaming right now is I do not get the vibe the reviewer is out to get AMD, at the same time I want an actual consensus from multiple reviews with far more benchmarks.
I actually think that's a difference in PCI-E controller rather than CPU performance. When AMD bought ATI they also gained their chipset guys, while Intel have been eroding into their chipsets to place more on the CPU. So I would certainly place more faith in chipset performance causing these strange results at higher resolutions over CPU performance. It doesn't make much sense otherwise, if the CPU has proven superior in almost every way under artificially high loads that real world high loads shouldn't cause such drops unless there is a factor everyone is ignoring.
Right now I'd say AMD is definitely running a stronger PCI-E controller, it's the only logical thing I can think of, as AMD's memory controller is obviously weaker than Intel's right now.
Source ?As promised the screen caps:
16801060 and 1920.1080 and aa8 lol
thxDonanim.
yeah man this Review Not professional16801060 and 1920.1080 and aa8 lol
Seemes to be running into other limitations, hard to judge the gaming performance.
X2 555 @ B55 @ 4050 1.4v, NB @ 2700 1.35v Fuzion V1
Gigabyte 890gpa-ud3h v2.1
HD6950 2GB swiftech MCW60 @ 1000mhz, 1.168v 1515mhz memory
Corsair Vengeance 2x4GB 1866 cas 9 @ 1800 8.9.8.27.41 1T 110ns 1.605v
C300 64GB, 2X Seagate barracuda green LP 2TB, Essence STX, Zalman ZM750-HP
DDC 3.2/petras, PA120.3 ek-res400, Stackers STC-01,
Dell U2412m, G110, G9x, Razer Scarab
Well game benchmarks are fail.. they show exactly what many others and me where saying -> gpu limitation @ that high res... regardless what cpu is used all perform the same... a difference of 1-2fps is laughable... and yes the scailing in the graphs is also bad.. but well I just made the screen caps.. blame donanimhaber.
for sure??
http://maxforces.com/articles.php?ar...38&rowstart=12
Comparison 4Ghz (920) vs 4.2Ghz Thurban
Use google translator Polish-English
games are the worst
Heatware Cecil
1+Well game benchmarks are fail.. they show exactly what I and many others where saying -> gpu limitation and that high res... regardless what cpu is used all perform the same... a difference of 1-2fps is laughable...
Did you know man this game benchmarks Settings Remember Me with AMD Slices
One hundred years from now It won't matter
What kind of car I drove What kind of house I lived in
How much money I had in the bank Nor what my cloths looked like.... But The world may be a little better Because, I was important In the life of a child.
-- from "Within My Power" by Forest Witcraft
lolWell maybe its in the offical amd review kit guidelines how to bench games?...
AMD This is wrong
One hundred years from now It won't matter
What kind of car I drove What kind of house I lived in
How much money I had in the bank Nor what my cloths looked like.... But The world may be a little better Because, I was important In the life of a child.
-- from "Within My Power" by Forest Witcraft
This game's benchmark settings must have a strong memory then, I would have forgotten you with AMD slices right away.
Obsolescence be thy name
Bookmarks