Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Phoronix: First Look: AMD Trinity APU, Linux Already Runs Well

  1. 10-08-2011, 09:13 AM #1
    BrowncoatGR
    BrowncoatGR is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Thessaloniki, Greece
    Posts
    1,307

    Phoronix: First Look: AMD Trinity APU, Linux Already Runs Well

    There don't appear to be any actual numbers though and i couldn't find them on openbenchmarking.org either, so it's possible they have been removed. The article is also partly a plug for their other ventures.


    One of the AMD Linux engineering systems for Trinity is running nicely even on Ubuntu 11.04 with the Linux 2.6.38 kernel. The CPU string is AMD Eng Sample 2M252057C4450_32/25/16_9900_609 and its graphics are the Trinity Devastator Mobile with 512MB of video memory and an AMD Pumori motherboard. The PCI ID on the Trinity Devastator appears to be 0x9900. This Trinity APU is quad-core and running at 2.50GHz. The current quad-core Llano offerings are clocked at 2.6GHz (A6-3650) and 2.9GHz (A8-3850), while this Trinity part is clocked slower, it's numbers are nice compared to my A8-3850 Linux system.
    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...ty_early&num=1
    Seems we made our greatest error when we named it at the start
    for though we called it "Human Nature" - it was cancer of the heart
    CPU: AMD X3 720BE@ 3,4Ghz
    Cooler: Xigmatek S1283(Terrible mounting system for AM2/3)
    Motherboard: Gigabyte 790FXT-UD5P(F4) RAM: 2x 2GB OCZ DDR3 1600Mhz Gold 8-8-8-24
    GPU:HD5850 1GB
    PSU: Seasonic M12D 750W Case: Coolermaster HAF932(aka Dusty )
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 10-08-2011, 09:53 AM #2
    AKM
    AKM is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    239
    Interesting if quad Trinity is doing "nice" vs quad Llano despite lower clocks, because according to recent leaks 4Ghz+ quad Bulldozer is well behind Deneb.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 10-08-2011, 10:12 AM #3
    blindbox
    blindbox is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    800
    The article author said he removed the juicy tidbits.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 10-08-2011, 10:36 AM #4
    Lightman
    Lightman is offline
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Devon
    Posts
    3,437
    Quote Originally Posted by AKM View Post
    Interesting if quad Trinity is doing "nice" vs quad Llano despite lower clocks, because according to recent leaks 4Ghz+ quad Bulldozer is well behind Deneb.
    My thoughts exactly.

    What does this mean? BD launching next week is bugged like hell or is it just AMD play to keep real numbers till launch?
    RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W

    RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU

    SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
    XBONE paired with 55'' Samsung LED 3D TV
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 10-08-2011, 01:40 PM #5
    informal
    informal is offline
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Let's wait and see how Bulldozer does first. By the look of things,not really good even against X6/X4,stock vs stock of course.
    Bulldozer IPC decrease procedure ! <=Terrace posted way too much
    My latest blog
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 10-09-2011, 01:36 AM #6
    FlanK3r
    FlanK3r is offline
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    Send a message via ICQ to FlanK3r
    it will be still interesting...Zambezi vs Piledriver core to core
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 10-09-2011, 03:35 AM #7
    Pantsu
    Pantsu is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    409
    Trinity uses improved piledriver cores, so it's good to hear they're doing nicely.
    "No, you'll warrant no villain's exposition from me."
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 10-09-2011, 10:32 AM #8
    TESKATLIPOKA
    TESKATLIPOKA is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Slovakia
    Posts
    169
    The question is if turbo +700 Mhz worked and on what speed most of the time.
    AMD Eng Sample 2M252057C4450_32/25/16_9900_609
    default 2.5Ghz, turbo 3.2Ghz, NB 1.6Ghz, stepping B6
    AMD Eng Sample 2D332158A2350_36/33/16_9991_711
    default 3.3Ghz, turbo 3.6Ghz, NB 1.6Ghz, stepping B6

    http://www.blog.de/srv/media/media_p...tem_ID=5824294
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules