OCN2
Page 9 of 26 FirstFirst ... 678910111219 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 225 of 646

Thread: Battlefield 3: New Video

  1. #201
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Near Venice as they say
    Posts
    1,314
    Arrived from work, started downloading
    TRUE Lapped - Intel Core i7 2600k 4,7Ghz - ASRock P67 Extreme4 Gen3 - Nvidia GTX 1080 FE - 16Gb Crucial 2133 Mhz CL9 1,51v - Crucial M4 256Gb - Crucial MX300 1050Gb - Corsair AX850 - Fractal Define R3


  2. #202
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by GoldenTiger View Post
    Here are my screenshots for comparison of the settings:

    LOW: http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/8318/lowt.jpg

    ULTRA: http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/1687/ultraa.jpg

    It's bugged, no question, and stuck on LOW. I did restart the game as well before to see if settings changes would work then and there's no change at all. I tried custom with everything maxed, ultra, and low presets, nothing changes.
    wouldn't be suprised since they want have as many players as possible, so they locked in on low or better on a fixed setting, which hasn't to be low.

  3. #203
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Planet Express HQ, US
    Posts
    385
    "Thanks for the f-shack. Love, Dirty Mike & The Boys" - from Dirty Mike & The Boys

  4. #204
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Planet Express HQ, US
    Posts
    385
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet331 View Post
    wouldn't be suprised since they want have as many players as possible, so they locked in on low or better on a fixed setting, which hasn't to be low.
    yeah i dont think its on low ... probably med-high i am guessing?

    btw a 6days old post:
    DICE: Battlefield 3 Beta Graphics Not Equal To Final Version
    "Thanks for the f-shack. Love, Dirty Mike & The Boys" - from Dirty Mike & The Boys

  5. #205
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Brighton, UK
    Posts
    211
    I.. I'm speechless..

    What the hell did I just play? Please tell me that wasn't Battlefield 3..

    - I have never seen such a retarded method of joining a server in my life.. I am truly shocked how appalling this is.
    - Game starts windowed. Change settings, windows again.
    - The game lag is WORSE than BC2!

    Theres endless more, I'm just going back to try again... Put it this way, If it's no better this time around I'm canceling my order. This is just a horrific experience.

    The best way I can describe it so far is a mix between MOH(recent one) and BC2.

  6. #206
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    511
    Quote Originally Posted by Philip_J_Fry View Post

  7. #207
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    74

    Windows 7 Pro 64
    GA-Z77X-UD3H Bios F13
    Intel i5 2500K @ 4.3Ghz 1.3xxv
    TRUE - Scythe S-FLEX 1600 rpm
    G.Skill RipJaws 4x4GB CL9-9-9-24 (DDR3-1600)
    AMD 6950 1GB Unlocked Shaders
    2 x Crucial c300 64GB in raid 0
    2 x Samsung Spinpoint F3 1GB in raid 1
    Corsair HX 750W
    Antec P182

  8. #208
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Planet Express HQ, US
    Posts
    385
    i like how PS3 gamer claims that "oh the cell has so much more power untapped. it should be as good if not better than PC version. look at uncharted 3!"

    cant wait to use that comparison to debunk their claim.
    "Thanks for the f-shack. Love, Dirty Mike & The Boys" - from Dirty Mike & The Boys

  9. #209
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Baltimore, MD USA
    Posts
    359
    ugg... hopefully new drivers can get the 6970 a little more FPS... I might have to get two to play this the way I want to...
    i5 4690k @ stock on Apogee GTX
    MB ????
    RAM ???
    HD6970 on mcw60
    PA120.3
    Custom Built Case

    My Blog:
    http://www.destructoid.com/blogs/Locke

  10. #210
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,080
    Quote Originally Posted by Philip_J_Fry View Post
    i like how PS3 gamer claims that "oh the cell has so much more power untapped. it should be as good if not better than PC version. look at uncharted 3!"
    Mwa ha ha ha ha

    Poor thing.

  11. #211
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    74
    Quote Originally Posted by Locke View Post
    ugg... hopefully new drivers can get the 6970 a little more FPS... I might have to get two to play this the way I want to...
    Definitely wait till you play it, pc games hardware seem to have really maxed the game, I think they maxed all the driver options too because other people are reporting much better fps, unfortunately I haven't received my beta key yet but I have a 6950 1gb card that can do 5500 in 3dmark11 so I'll my results here when I get a chance to play.

    Windows 7 Pro 64
    GA-Z77X-UD3H Bios F13
    Intel i5 2500K @ 4.3Ghz 1.3xxv
    TRUE - Scythe S-FLEX 1600 rpm
    G.Skill RipJaws 4x4GB CL9-9-9-24 (DDR3-1600)
    AMD 6950 1GB Unlocked Shaders
    2 x Crucial c300 64GB in raid 0
    2 x Samsung Spinpoint F3 1GB in raid 1
    Corsair HX 750W
    Antec P182

  12. #212
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Near Venice as they say
    Posts
    1,314
    Crappy marketing from Nvidia...high to ultra changes nothing and my single tie 5870 (waiting for the second) is able to run it smoothly
    TRUE Lapped - Intel Core i7 2600k 4,7Ghz - ASRock P67 Extreme4 Gen3 - Nvidia GTX 1080 FE - 16Gb Crucial 2133 Mhz CL9 1,51v - Crucial M4 256Gb - Crucial MX300 1050Gb - Corsair AX850 - Fractal Define R3


  13. #213
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,263
    I hope it runs a lot better sans AA and Hbao. I played bc2 like that to get a solid 120 fps.
    Feedanator 7.0
    CASE:R5|PSU:850G2|CPU:i7 6850K|MB:x99 Ultra|RAM:8x4 2666|GPU:980TI|SSD:BPX256/Evo500|SOUND:2i4/HS8
    LCD:XB271HU|OS:Win10|INPUT:G900/K70 |HS/F:H115i

  14. #214
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Brighton, UK
    Posts
    211
    Ok whew, it's not to bad after several hours of play and adjusting to the play.

    There seems to be quite a few bugs, especially when you leap over stuff.. Overall it's just this server browser and windowing which is really ticking me off.

    Running quite nicely on 2x480's OC'd | Ultra in game settings | 16xAF/4xAA (Nvidia settings) Pretty much a constant ~60

  15. #215
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    So who agains said a webseit based serverbrowser in the browser is a good idea?

    Anyway its seems the map choixe just explodes right into there face... the offial forum explodes with "omfg cod clone/meatgrind shooter" etc... hilarious...

  16. #216
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    865
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet331 View Post
    So who agains said a webseit based serverbrowser in the browser is a good idea?

    Anyway its seems the map choixe just explodes right into there face... the offial forum explodes with "omfg cod clone/meatgrind shooter" etc... hilarious...
    seriously, the map choice for beta was a god awful decision on thier part....this is ing battlefield, if your gonna run a open beta to double as a demo.....use a map that makes battelfield....well, battlefield...morons at dice I swear.

    theres a balance between not showing off too much of the game, but showing off the game for what it is (or should be) obviously the "lets not show any of the game for a surprise" idiots won this argument.

    its not about surprises anymore, they have huge competition in the FPS market now....and they are trying to win over fans taking the "real" battlefield experience to console....show the freaking game for what it is and stop being so hush, hush...my god!! ....i swear if theres not some changes in decisions at dice, they are going to continue to be mediocre with games that shouldnt be. they need to rethink thier game plan here....everything was going alright till this decision.

    expect huge bugs/balancing issues with air vehicles on release....cause the idiots at dice right now have too big of a head and are trying to be way too close curtain about this game.
    Last edited by Decami; 09-27-2011 at 03:44 PM.
    This post above was delayed 90 times by Nvidia. Cause that's their thing, thats what they do.
    This Announcement of the delayed post above has been brought to you by Nvidia Inc.

    RIGGY
    case:Antec 1200
    MB: XFX Nforce 750I SLI 72D9
    CPU:E8400 (1651/4x9) 3712.48
    MEM:4gb Gskill DDR21000 (5-5-5-15)
    GPU: NVIDIA GTX260 EVGA SSC (X2 in SLI) both 652/1403
    PS:Corsair 650TX
    OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ultimate
    --Cooling--
    5x120mm 1x200mm
    Zalman 9700LED
    Displays: Samsung LN32B650/Samsung 2243BWX/samsung P2350


  17. #217
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    589
    Note to people trying to compare the graphical settings: Don't forget to reset the game, otherwise the changes don't apply, hence the "bug" named earlier. There is quite a difference between low and ultra, just try it with a reset of the game after the changes :P
    i7 2600K @ 4.6GHz/Maximus IV Extreme
    2x 4GB Corsair Vengeance 1866
    HD5870 1GB PCS+/OCZ Vertex 120GB +
    WD Caviar Black 1TB
    Corsair HX850/HAF 932/Acer GD235HZ
    Auzentech X-Fi Forte/Sennheiser PC-350 + Corsair SP2500

  18. #218
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Bulgaria
    Posts
    238
    Any idea what's the difference between DX10 and DX11?
    ASUS P5E Deluxe X48 | C2Q Q9550@testing[Fuzion v2+MCR320+MCP655] | G.Skill 4x2GB F2-8800CL5D-4GBPQ@testing | Sapphire 4870X2@ testing | 150GB WD VelociRaptor + 2xWD6400AAKS | Chieftec CFT-850-14C | Iiyama E2403WS | Razer DeathAdder | CM CosmosS Black

  19. #219
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    74
    Quote Originally Posted by spoof View Post
    Any idea what's the difference between DX10 and DX11?
    dx11 give them the ability to make better optimizations in the shaders.

    Windows 7 Pro 64
    GA-Z77X-UD3H Bios F13
    Intel i5 2500K @ 4.3Ghz 1.3xxv
    TRUE - Scythe S-FLEX 1600 rpm
    G.Skill RipJaws 4x4GB CL9-9-9-24 (DDR3-1600)
    AMD 6950 1GB Unlocked Shaders
    2 x Crucial c300 64GB in raid 0
    2 x Samsung Spinpoint F3 1GB in raid 1
    Corsair HX 750W
    Antec P182

  20. #220
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by Decami View Post
    seriously, the map choice for beta was a god awful decision on thier part....this is ing battlefield, if your gonna run a open beta to double as a demo.....use a map that makes battelfield....well, battlefield...morons at dice I swear.

    theres a balance between not showing off too much of the game, but showing off the game for what it is (or should be) obviously the "lets not show any of the game for a surprise" idiots won this argument.

    its not about surprises anymore, they have huge competition in the FPS market now....and they are trying to win over fans taking the "real" battlefield experience to console....show the freaking game for what it is and stop being so hush, hush...my god!! ....i swear if theres not some changes in decisions at dice, they are going to continue to be mediocre with games that shouldnt be. they need to rethink thier game plan here....everything was going alright till this decision.

    expect huge bugs/balancing issues with air vehicles on release....cause the idiots at dice right now have too big of a head and are trying to be way too close curtain about this game.
    Well they want the COD market, BC2 showed that.. and what does the COD crowd want -> linaer as meat grinder fps

  21. #221
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Baltimore, MD USA
    Posts
    359
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet331 View Post
    Well they want the COD market, BC2 showed that.. and what does the COD crowd want -> linaer as meat grinder fps
    QFT... Battlefield as we know it is dead. BF3 might take us a bit closer to BF2 and 2142 but the idea of large sprawling maps is gone. Even in the larger maps the cap points are close together with all this huge open space around it... rush really sucks... head on head cluster fighting is not what battlefield is about... but all my console wielding co-workers love rush over conquest as conquest takes too long and boring to keep their attention spans... also its easier for them to play together and do better... aka "synergy" since there is little chance of the bad guys flanking them. Rush is fun but for game play conquest is a better game due to a more fluid battlefield.

    COD = counterstrike from 10 years ago.. nothing new other than taking $90 a year on crappy "upgrades" and "updates" just to suit the fad that COD is a good game or a new game... its not really either... not saying that someone cant have fun playing a bad game.

    Battlefield is just that an entire field of battle with tanks and APC's and jets... its open and requires coordination to win... BC2 was about sitting and sniping with pistols that hit harder than assault rifles and SMG's from across the board...
    i5 4690k @ stock on Apogee GTX
    MB ????
    RAM ???
    HD6970 on mcw60
    PA120.3
    Custom Built Case

    My Blog:
    http://www.destructoid.com/blogs/Locke

  22. #222
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    469
    Quote Originally Posted by Locke View Post
    ...Battlefield is just that an entire field of battle with tanks and APC's and jets... its open and requires coordination to win... BC2 was about sitting and sniping with pistols that hit harder than assault rifles and SMG's from across the board...


    ahh sniping with overpowered pistols, that reminds me of my days playing the original halo, that thing was stupid powerful. 3 to head and they were dead

  23. #223
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,251
    Quote Originally Posted by phantomferrari View Post
    3 to head and they were dead
    i see wut you did there
    1. Asus P5Q-E / Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @~3612 MHz (8,5x425) / 2x2GB OCZ Platinum XTC (PC2-8000U, CL5) / EVGA GeForce GTX 570 / Crucial M4 128GB, WD Caviar Blue 640GB, WD Caviar SE16 320GB, WD Caviar SE 160GB / be quiet! Dark Power Pro P7 550W / Thermaltake Tsunami VA3000BWA / LG L227WT / Teufel Concept E Magnum 5.1 // SysProfile


    2. Asus A8N-SLI / AMD Athlon 64 4000+ @~2640 MHz (12x220) / 1024 MB Corsair CMX TwinX 3200C2, 2.5-3-3-6 1T / Club3D GeForce 7800GT @463/1120 MHz / Crucial M4 64GB, Hitachi Deskstar 40GB / be quiet! Blackline P5 470W

  24. #224
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Near Venice as they say
    Posts
    1,314
    Quote Originally Posted by Locke View Post
    QFT... Battlefield as we know it is dead. BF3 might take us a bit closer to BF2 and 2142 but the idea of large sprawling maps is gone. Even in the larger maps the cap points are close together with all this huge open space around it... rush really sucks... head on head cluster fighting is not what battlefield is about... but all my console wielding co-workers love rush over conquest as conquest takes too long and boring to keep their attention spans... also its easier for them to play together and do better... aka "synergy" since there is little chance of the bad guys flanking them. Rush is fun but for game play conquest is a better game due to a more fluid battlefield.

    COD = counterstrike from 10 years ago.. nothing new other than taking $90 a year on crappy "upgrades" and "updates" just to suit the fad that COD is a good game or a new game... its not really either... not saying that someone cant have fun playing a bad game.

    Battlefield is just that an entire field of battle with tanks and APC's and jets... its open and requires coordination to win... BC2 was about sitting and sniping with pistols that hit harder than assault rifles and SMG's from across the board...
    I told some pages ago this is BC3, so no news about that. And Frostbite 2 is just the first version with some improvements.
    It takes some elements from the latest MOH: like more deadly and less recoil weapons (with some accessories on them).
    I liked the fact that knifing is much more slow now.
    And yes, Battlefield as we know it is dead.
    TRUE Lapped - Intel Core i7 2600k 4,7Ghz - ASRock P67 Extreme4 Gen3 - Nvidia GTX 1080 FE - 16Gb Crucial 2133 Mhz CL9 1,51v - Crucial M4 256Gb - Crucial MX300 1050Gb - Corsair AX850 - Fractal Define R3


  25. #225
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Aland Islands, Finland
    Posts
    1,139
    Judging by the negative comment I guess you guys have played all the maps already?
    Asus Crosshair IV Extreme
    AMD FX-8350
    AMD ref. HD 6950 2Gb x 2
    4x4Gb HyperX T1
    Corsair AX1200
    3 x Alphacool triple, 2 x Alphacool ATXP 6970/50, EK D5 dual top, EK Supreme HF

Page 9 of 26 FirstFirst ... 678910111219 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •