Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: questions about the bitcoin application and mining?

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,445

    questions about the bitcoin application and mining?

    when i receive a transaction it waits for confirmations....ok i get that part. but now i have 20+ received transactions that keep receiving confirmations? i mean dont these things go away? the bitcoin program now takes up 100mb of ram???? my second question is about mining? why does each gpu need its own worker? i mean why cant multiple gpus be on the same worker? i see some workers that do 8gh/s, and there is no card out there that can do that speed alone?


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Capture.JPG 
Views:	381 
Size:	45.6 KB 
ID:	118967



    thanks.
    [MOBO] Asus CrossHair Formula 5 AM3+
    [GPU] ATI 6970 x2 Crossfire 2Gb
    [RAM] G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 16GB (4 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 1600
    [CPU] AMD FX-8120 @ 4.8 ghz
    [COOLER] XSPC Rasa 750 RS360 WaterCooling
    [OS] Windows 8 x64 Enterprise
    [HDD] OCZ Vertex 3 120GB SSD
    [AUDIO] Logitech S-220 17 Watts 2.1

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Around the corner
    Posts
    175
    There are clients like Diablo Miner that creates 1 "worker" and binds all of your GPU's in the system to that one worker. Some pools allow multiple clients to send to the same worker as well. Really there is no benefit to either way, other than it's harder to track GPU performance without multiple workers. Transaction confirms will continue to climb as long as blocks are being solved. You do not need to leave bitcoin open, in fact, it is much less secure than encrypting the wallet.dat and only opening it when you need to.
    Main Comp (Win 7): ASUS R4E, i7-3930k @ 4.9GHz, G.Skill Ripjaw Z 4x4GB @ 2133MHz, ATI 6950flash/6970 Xfire, Custom Watercooling
    3x Asus VW246H eyefinity; Polk Audio Monitor 40's (L,R), CS10 (C), Klipsch KG^4 (S), Sony STR-DA1000ES; all in a custom built desk
    Server: (Ubuntu 11.04) i7-920 @ 3.8GHz, 24GB G.Skill

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,445
    ok thanks.
    [MOBO] Asus CrossHair Formula 5 AM3+
    [GPU] ATI 6970 x2 Crossfire 2Gb
    [RAM] G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 16GB (4 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 1600
    [CPU] AMD FX-8120 @ 4.8 ghz
    [COOLER] XSPC Rasa 750 RS360 WaterCooling
    [OS] Windows 8 x64 Enterprise
    [HDD] OCZ Vertex 3 120GB SSD
    [AUDIO] Logitech S-220 17 Watts 2.1

  4. #4
    Fanboy of Good Products
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    4,050
    I've got a question. Why does the hash rate seem higher when i view directly in GUIminer than it does when i view in my account on BTC Guild? BTC Guild reports each of my five cards hash rates at about 15-30 m/h slower. Which one is correct?
    Cruncher #1: EVGA Z68 FTW | i7-2600k @ 4.5 | 6GB Ram
    Cruncher #2: Supermicro Dual-Socket | 2 x 6-core Opterons | 4GB Ram
    Cruncher #3: 8-core Xserve 1,1

    T400 for non-crunching



    "But don't think you'll run me over - It's, ah, planting season here in Texas... and the farm is growing..." -Otis11 on crunching WCG

  5. #5
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Plymouth (UK)
    Posts
    5,279
    Some sites mention this on the page somewhere. Site figures are often not accurate. Your mining software figures will be better. There may be some weight in the idea that what the sites calculate takes into consideration time to send the finished share but having seen my cards reported as anything between 350 and 475 when mining full speed I just treat the site figures as a means of seeing (remotely) that my cards are running.


    My Biggest Fear Is When I die, My Wife Sells All My Stuff For What I Told Her I Paid For It.
    79 SB threads and 32 IB Threads across 4 rigs 111 threads Crunching!!

  6. #6
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    403
    Quote Originally Posted by OldChap View Post
    Some sites mention this on the page somewhere. Site figures are often not accurate. Your mining software figures will be better. There may be some weight in the idea that what the sites calculate takes into consideration time to send the finished share but having seen my cards reported as anything between 350 and 475 when mining full speed I just treat the site figures as a means of seeing (remotely) that my cards are running.
    +1 also some sites look at what work your workers have done in 10-15 min so this number will be a average and not a actual value.
    Main Rig

    Gigabyte z78x-OC Bios F5n
    i7-4770k batch L310B492 Malay @ 4.5ghz with HT 1.2v
    Samsung Green 8GB 2x4GB MV-3V4G3D/US DDR3 1.3v 30nn
    HiS ATI HD 6950
    Corsair Force GT 120 GB Sata3 SSD (boot drive) on Intel sata3 controller port0
    Samsung 320GB HD322GJ 7200 RPM 16M cache on Intel sata3 controller port1
    Sony Optiarc DVD-RW AD-7240S on Intel sata3 controller port4
    CORSAIR CMPSU-850TX PSU
    Swiftech MCP655-B Pump
    EK Suppreme HF Cpu Block
    Swiftech Mcres Micro Rev 2 Reservoir
    Black Ice GTX Xtreme 360 Radiator

    Server
    HAF 932
    Gigabyte z77x-UD3H F13
    i7-3770S batch 3212B621 supports VT-D and low power
    32GB 4x8gb Muskin Enhanced Blackline 10-10-10-27@1.65v
    Vmware vSphere ESXi 5.0u1
    4x500GB Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.D Raid 10 on a IBM M1015 <- DataStore
    Sapphire HD 5850

  7. #7
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    AB. Canada
    Posts
    827
    myself i use cgminer. 1 account for all GPU's as CJ145 said

    my question i have about confirmations. what are all these confirmations?
    verification that teh computed block is correct? so computed multiple times?


    "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds" - (Einstein)

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •