Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 76

Thread: ADATA: 8GB unbuffered DIMMs, get your 8GB unbuffered DIMMs, now at Newegg

  1. #26
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Bay Area, California
    Posts
    705
    Quote Originally Posted by eXa View Post
    If your buying this ram its for more than 16gb of ram (if not then just buy 4/6 4gb sticks), so 32 or 48gb ram...
    Now my question: when do you "need"/want to use ECC? 32/48GB ram is starting to be quite an amount...
    From what I've seen, memory reliability (per bit) goes up with the size. Such that the (per module) failure rate stays constant.
    Obviously, the manufacturers can't make larger and larger ram modules while maintaining the same (per bit) failure rate, otherwise, the (per module) failure rate will just keep going up.

    Say a few years from now, you can't sell a 128GB module with the same (per bit) failure rate as a 4GB module today - or they'll all be coming back to RMA.
    Main Machine:
    AMD FX8350 @ stock --- 16 GB DDR3 @ 1333 MHz --- Asus M5A99FX Pro R2.0 --- 2.0 TB Seagate

    Miscellaneous Workstations for Code-Testing:
    Intel Core i7 4770K @ 4.0 GHz --- 32 GB DDR3 @ 1866 MHz --- Asus Z87-Plus --- 1.5 TB (boot) --- 4 x 1 TB + 4 x 2 TB (swap)

  2. #27
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    151
    32GB sounds about right for a video editing workstation. As soon as you need to mix more than a couple video tracks, that'll fill right up.

  3. #28
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    447
    Yes finally! 8gb! this will be huge for sandy-e motherboards, considering most boards will only be 4 dimms (cept for a few high end $$ 8 dimm boads). 16gb on a high end machine is good but not great. I wanted a least 24, now I can get 32gb~


    I mean, its silly how you can get 24 gigs on your average 6-dimm x58 board...but the platform replacing it, x79, only 4 dimms average...WEAK. This corrects the issue, hopefully prices will drop a lot by the time sandye launches
    Iron Lung 3.0 | Intel Core i7 6800k @ 4ghz | 32gb G.SKILL RIPJAW V DDR4-3200 @16-16-16-36 | ASUS ROG STRIX X99 GAMING + ASUS ROG GeForce GTX 1070 STRIX GAMING | Samsung 960 Pro 512GB + Samsung 840 EVO + 4TB HDD | 55" Samsung KS8000 + 30" Dell u3011 via Displayport - @ 6400x2160

  4. #29
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    3,858
    Sold out
    i5 750 4.20GHz @ NH-D14 | 8GB | P7P55DLE | 8800U | Indilinx SSD + Samsung F3 | HAF922 + CM750W
    Past: Q6600 @ 3.60 E6400 @ 3.60 | E6300 @ 3.40 | O165 @ 2.90 | X2 4400+ @ 2.80 | X2 3800+ @ 2.70 | VE 3200+ @ 2.80 | WI 3200+ @ 2.75 | WI 3000+ no IHS @ 2.72 | TBB 1700+ @ 2.60 | XP-M 2500+ @ 2.63 | NC 2800+ @ 2.40 | AB 1.60GHz @ 2.60
    Quote Originally Posted by CompGeek
    The US is the only country that doesn't use [nuclear weapons] to terrorize other countries. The US is based on Christian values, unlike any other country in the world. Granted we are straying from our Christian heritage, but we still have a freedom aimed diplomatic stance.

  5. #30
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Between Sky and Earth
    Posts
    2,035
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    8gb 1333 999 dimms... for gaming?
    what games need 16-24gb of memory? 0_o

    nice to see 8gb dimms, but weird they try to sell it as gaming stuff...
    Guess you never played a game installed on a Ram Disk... If you think SSD are fast, you ain't seen nothing yet.

  6. #31
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,116
    Deep breath:

    Quote Originally Posted by [XC] Synthetickiller View Post
    The price for this kit is nuts. 2x8gb 1333 ECC kits can be had for $100 less than this kit.
    Not unbuffered ECC...


    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    I'm still using 3x2GB DIMMs, lol. And I don't see much need to upgrade...
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    8gb 1333 999 dimms... for gaming?
    what games need 16-24gb of memory? 0_o
    You might be on the wrong forum, dogs. This one is called xtreme systems. If all you want is 4GB dimms then buy up. They're as cheap as memory ever gets.


    Quote Originally Posted by cirthix View Post
    There is no reason for this ram to be more expensive than 8gb reg ecc
    Except there is nothing else like it. Supply and demand, you know? And look at the voltage. These are new chips.


    Quote Originally Posted by poke349 View Post
    From what I've seen, memory reliability (per bit) goes up with the size.
    Memory reliability has roughly gone up over time, but not because of the chips have more capacity... all else being equal, more memory means more errors, full stop...

    I would rather everyone use unbuffered ECC, but that is not the news story. Maybe next month.

  7. #32
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    2,267
    No need for rebuttals. Why does it seem that people who just voiced their opinions are not welcome unless they say "Its great, any price, I am on board."

    We don't need to argue just because other people entered the discussion.

    I think its great, I just will wait until the price falls. Others feel that its excessive memory that isn't really necessary. What's wrong with that?

    Edit: That said, A-Data didn't price it there because of people like me. They knew that Demand would be there given the limited supply. Once competition arrives with the same thing we'll see prices fall.
    Last edited by Stewie007; 07-30-2011 at 05:12 PM.
    Regards, Stew.....

    - This message brought to you by Frank Lee E. Snutz

  8. #33
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Shanhai China
    Posts
    669

    In two years time

    Well just looking down the line till 2013 and the average PC will have 6-8CPUs, 256GB SSD, 24-32GB RAM,8TB HDs, 4GB GPUs and it still wont score 7.9 on Windows Experience Index!
    Last edited by chinaguy; 07-30-2011 at 05:17 PM.
    24/7 PC CoolerMaster CM690 + 7 fans(its HOT as HELL in Shanghai) Intel Xeon E3 1230 3.3-3.7Ghz, 2x8GB DDR3 1600 G-Skill, HD GT630 2GB, Scandisk Pro 256SSD 2x2TB Green, 2x 3TB WD Green Data Drives. HTPC Q8400, EP45 UD3L 4x1GB Gskill6400, 1xWD Black 640GB,2x2TB WD Green, 2xWD 1TB Blue(RAID1), Sapphire 4530 512MB,

    Computers have enabled people to make more mistakes faster than almost any invention in history, with the possible exception of tequila and hand guns.

    Mitch Ratcliffe, U.S. technology journalist and blogger

  9. #34
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    2,267
    Windows Experience Index............ eheheheheee....
    Regards, Stew.....

    - This message brought to you by Frank Lee E. Snutz

  10. #35
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,671
    Quote Originally Posted by Tenknics View Post
    Yes finally! 8gb! this will be huge for sandy-e motherboards, considering most boards will only be 4 dimms (cept for a few high end $$ 8 dimm boads). 16gb on a high end machine is good but not great. I wanted a least 24, now I can get 32gb~


    I mean, its silly how you can get 24 gigs on your average 6-dimm x58 board...but the platform replacing it, x79, only 4 dimms average...WEAK. This corrects the issue, hopefully prices will drop a lot by the time sandye launches
    I'm quite sure that higher end X79 boards will have 8 dimm slots.

    I thought I was crazy buying two lots of 12 Gb ram, if I had waited until now I could have saved Ģ50 too.

    Everything became noticeably quicker with the 4 Gb dimms, but one kit really would have sufficed. I just like to fill all my slots for no reason

    Quote Originally Posted by chinaguy View Post
    Well just looking down the line till 2013 and the average PC will have 6-8CPUs, 256GB SSD, 24-32GB RAM,8TB HDs, 4GB GPUs and it still wont score 7.9 on Windows Experience Index!
    Lol, I only have 7.5
    Last edited by Mungri; 07-30-2011 at 07:34 PM.

  11. #36
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Shanhai China
    Posts
    669

    Nasa 1966

    I wounder how much RAM there was in the United States of America in 1966, did that add up to 8GB!

    Thats just to put things into prospective for anybody born after 1985. I can now fit under my desk more CPU processing power, more Hard Disk Storage and RAM then exsisted in the entire United States of America in 1966!!!
    24/7 PC CoolerMaster CM690 + 7 fans(its HOT as HELL in Shanghai) Intel Xeon E3 1230 3.3-3.7Ghz, 2x8GB DDR3 1600 G-Skill, HD GT630 2GB, Scandisk Pro 256SSD 2x2TB Green, 2x 3TB WD Green Data Drives. HTPC Q8400, EP45 UD3L 4x1GB Gskill6400, 1xWD Black 640GB,2x2TB WD Green, 2xWD 1TB Blue(RAID1), Sapphire 4530 512MB,

    Computers have enabled people to make more mistakes faster than almost any invention in history, with the possible exception of tequila and hand guns.

    Mitch Ratcliffe, U.S. technology journalist and blogger

  12. #37
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    The Curragh.
    Posts
    1,294
    Quote Originally Posted by bhavv View Post

    Lol, I only have 7.5
    I'm on 5.9 thanks to not having an SSD yet.

    Everytime I go to buy one I change my mind.

    Also I'd love these 8GB dimms. Hmm...two of them in my next m-ITX system.

    Should stop me from having to worry about ram for a while then haha.

  13. #38
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    2,267
    Mine is stuck at 5.9 too..... My wife's is at 4.3 thanks to her laptop graphics hehehehe.....However by the time I have the $$$ and time to finish my chiller and get the new computer Bulldozer will probably be on its second generation and this stuff will be cheaper..... and faster. ^_^
    Regards, Stew.....

    - This message brought to you by Frank Lee E. Snutz

  14. #39
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by Hell Hound View Post
    Read this:
    http://developer.amd.com/documentati...ure_Topics.pdf

    Gives you a idea why more memory is better.
    why i thought less memory was better! :o
    OMG! *runs to bank and withdraws savings and rushes to computer market*
    pls...

    of course more memory is better, i just dont think its needed for games...

  15. #40
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,079
    Why the "gaming" label?

  16. #41
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,116
    Quote Originally Posted by El Maņo View Post
    Why the "gaming" label?
    You should probably pose that question to ADATA.

  17. #42
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    2,267
    Quote Originally Posted by El Maņo View Post
    Why the "gaming" label?
    Who markets desktop memory like this toward anyone else? Its pretty obvious why they are marketing it toward gamers.
    Regards, Stew.....

    - This message brought to you by Frank Lee E. Snutz

  18. #43
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,079
    Quote Originally Posted by Stewie007 View Post
    Who markets desktop memory like this toward anyone else? Its pretty obvious why they are marketing it toward gamers.
    I don't get it. There are only a very few games that have 64bit executable.
    If you want to use dual channel you need to buy 16GB.

    Unless you plan on playing a dozen games at the same time I can't see why a gamer would need more than 6GB.

  19. #44
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    2,267
    Quote Originally Posted by El Maņo View Post
    I don't get it. There are only a very few games that have 64bit executable.
    If you want to use dual channel you need to buy 16GB.

    Unless you plan on playing a dozen games at the same time I can't see why a gamer would need more than 6GB.
    I agree. However, it has already been established that the folks who have bought this aren't interested in need. It is about having it because it is there.

    Did I need a 361HP car? Will it NEED to have 450+ after I modify the engine? No. Of course, I can't do any of this unless I have the financing to support it.

    RAM is obviously a lot cheaper, but the point is your or I aren't willing to spend $330 just to have something. Others are willing.
    Regards, Stew.....

    - This message brought to you by Frank Lee E. Snutz

  20. #45
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,671
    Quote Originally Posted by Stewie007 View Post
    Mine is stuck at 5.9 too..... My wife's is at 4.3 thanks to her laptop graphics hehehehe.....However by the time I have the $$$ and time to finish my chiller and get the new computer Bulldozer will probably be on its second generation and this stuff will be cheaper..... and faster. ^_^
    I got 7.7 on CPU and Ram (My cas 6 2 Gb sticks used to be 7.9 ), 7.9 on graphics, 7.5 on the SSD.

    Triple channel Cas 9 1600 Mhz is all you need on X58, there are no gains at all from having faster stuff. On SB you want at least 1866 Mhz. These 8 Gb sticks are most definitely not performance / gaming ram.

    I could actually get my 2 Gb sticks replaced on warranty too, they are Geil 2133 Mhz ones that arent even stable at 1900 Mhz, but I kept them for their Cas 6 clocks of up to 1700 Mhz. I'll have to test each pair individually though and I cant be bothered to do that. Plus I'd have to post them to Taiwan and I dont think Geil have anything thats better than Cas 6 1700 Mhz dimms.

    Quote Originally Posted by El Maņo View Post
    Unless you plan on playing a dozen games at the same time I can't see why a gamer would need more than 6GB.
    For greed, I have an obsession with wanting to fill all my slots with decent stuff, and that is currently done. Somehow I have to force myself to keep it all for a few more years, I'm already twitching to buy the 4 Gb cas 7 1600 Mhz G.Skill modules and selling my Corsairs, but it would make no difference on X58, and there will be far better ram released next year for Ivy Bridge.
    Last edited by Mungri; 07-31-2011 at 10:35 AM.

  21. #46
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    2,267
    Quote Originally Posted by bhavv View Post
    I got 7.7 on CPU and Ram (My cas 6 2 Gb sticks used to be 7.9 ), 7.9 on graphics, 7.5 on the SSD.
    My stuff is quite old..... well, in tech terms its old. Phenom 9850, Radeon 3870 X2..... Its not going to be updated at all.... I'm saving that $$$ for the chilled rig..
    Regards, Stew.....

    - This message brought to you by Frank Lee E. Snutz

  22. #47
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    Quote Originally Posted by El Maņo View Post
    Unless you plan on playing a dozen games at the same time I can't see why a gamer would need more than 6GB.
    Although a gamer, I do sometimes do things other than games. It was pretty cramped back when I was on 8 GB when I'd do some development work. I had to upgrade to 12.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  23. #48
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Chicago,Illinois
    Posts
    1,182
    Same one's that use to say quad core will never be needed.
    I would like the kit to be 1866 cs 6,but that won't be till gen3 bd @ least.



  24. #49
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,374
    Gaming may not require much memory, but de novo sequence assembly of the human genome requires machines with 512 Gb and beyond . There will always be ways to use up more memory, more processors, or more storage space. It may take a little bit for consumer software to catch up to the progress, but there is plenty of academic and industrial research going on that can put it to use. Give it time, and you'll find that you don't have enough space on your boot drive as windows has taken up the first terabyte from the install , or need more than 64 Gb of memory. Sometimes the hardware becomes less an immediate necessity and more an opportunity to do things previously impossible on a traditional computer.

  25. #50
    Xtreme CCIE
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    3,842
    There is not the slightest chance I would ever buy this product - that price is completely unreasonable. For the cost difference vs. ECC memory alone you could actually probably just move to a dual-socket (server-grade) system in the first place and enjoy the same amount of memory, but with better performance* and better overall stability (due to use of ECC and server-grade parts).

    *Statement assumes that to bother to spend that much on RAM you're using a high-end consumer CPU, which you could then replace with two mid-end server-grade CPU's instead to still total more horsepower.


    Quote Originally Posted by bamtan2 View Post
    Deep breath:
    <quote pointing out that 2x8GB ECC kits are at least $100 cheaper>
    Not unbuffered ECC...
    That's exactly why this kit is ridiculous. ECC kits require additional logic and memory components, and are typically built to a higher standard - they are notably cheaper to build. Hence it's bananas that anyone would pay this much for a cheaper product.
    Last edited by Serra; 07-31-2011 at 04:58 PM.
    Dual CCIE (Route\Switch and Security) at your disposal. Have a Cisco-related or other network question? My PM box is always open.

    Xtreme Network:
    - Cisco 3560X-24P PoE Switch
    - Cisco ASA 5505 Firewall
    - Cisco 4402 Wireless LAN Controller
    - Cisco 3502i Access Point

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •