Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Multiplier Unlocked Fusion-A8 3870 APU On it's Way

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Istanbul,Turkey
    Posts
    50

    Post Multiplier Unlocked Fusion-A8 3870 APU On it's Way

    According to the article Fusion-A8 3870 will be released in Q4 2011.There is no certain info about clock speed but it's speculated to have a clockspeed of 3.10Ghz.Certain is that the TDP is 100watts,it sports 1MB L2 cache for each core (4Mb total) and integrated Radeon HD 6550D graphics.





    Source: http://www.donanimhaber.com/tm.asp?m=50858785 (of course )
    • ABIT-IP35
    • C2Q Q6600@3.33Ghz@Swiftech Apogee GT
    • Palit GTX460 768mb@Swiftech MCW60@1000mhz-1.212v
    • Kingston 3gb 800mhz
    • Alphacool NexXxoS Xtreme III Rev.2 360mm
    • CM Stacker 830
    • Samsung 2233BW 22'' TFT
    • Creative X-Fi Xtrememusic
    • Gigaworks Progamer G500

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    201
    This would be fun to mess around with. Lots of reviewers thought this CPU is being held back from being locked.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    1,246
    Amd needs to improve process in order to scale with voltage.Since my 3850 needs 1.4V for 3.4 ghz,it's voltage limited not BLCK.So an unlocked version with same overclock capacity would mean nothing.We need LLANO to make 4.0 at least for daily use in order to be competitive.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Devon
    Posts
    3,437
    Quote Originally Posted by Alex-Ro View Post
    Amd needs to improve process in order to scale with voltage.Since my 3850 needs 1.4V for 3.4 ghz,it's voltage limited not BLCK.So an unlocked version with same overclock capacity would mean nothing.We need LLANO to make 4.0 at least for daily use in order to be competitive.
    I think one of the reasons we don't have unlocked parts from the get go is that AMD is aware they are process limited at the moment. Black edition will probably have either new stepping or improved process to allow better clocks. Ideally both!
    RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W

    RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU

    SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
    XBONE paired with 55'' Samsung LED 3D TV

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Hopatcong, NJ
    Posts
    1,078
    That's a good point Lightman. Releasing an unlocked part in the current state of Llano would probably be more harm than good. As it is, power consumption, clocks, voltage could all be better on desktop. As the 32nm process matures, I'm sure we'll start seeing better clocking chips... just like we saw in Phenom II launch (720BE/940BE) vs today's parts. Amazing what AMD was able to squeeze out of 45nm

  6. #6
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    US
    Posts
    1,379
    Quote Originally Posted by Alex-Ro View Post
    Amd needs to improve process in order to scale with voltage.Since my 3850 needs 1.4V for 3.4 ghz,it's voltage limited not BLCK.So an unlocked version with same overclock capacity would mean nothing.We need LLANO to make 4.0 at least for daily use in order to be competitive.
    Agreed. While 1.4v is the stock voltage, and OCing with it seems to yield you something, it doesn't leave much room to move up. Mine does 3.5 with ~1.475v, but I'm not too comfortable with moving past that at this moment. If these chips came stock at 1.1v or 1.2v and were still comfortable with 1.4v+ that might be a game changer.

    As far as unlocked parts go, it's sort of a waste unless they unlock the GPU multi too (which isn't even exposed on my bios/uefi). Pushing up the ref clock unlocks the magic of this cpu since it moves the graphics up too. TBQH, I'd be happy with just a PCI-E multi to adjust. Fortunately, I can still use the x1 slot on my mobo, since it doesn't seem to run at insano speed with the ref clock at 150. The x16 slots seem pretty much useless at that clock.

    --Matt
    Last edited by mattkosem; 07-19-2011 at 10:13 AM.
    My Rig :
    Core i5 4570S - ASUS Z87I-DELUXE - 16GB Mushkin Blackline DDR3-2400 - 256GB Plextor M5 Pro Xtreme

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    151
    Quote Originally Posted by mattkosem View Post
    TBQH, I'd be happy with just a PCI-E multi to adjust. Fortunately, I can still use the x1 slot on my mobo, since it doesn't seem to run at insano speed with the ref clock at 150. The x16 slots seem pretty much useless at that clock.

    --Matt
    Sounds like clock skew/jitter; with a single lane there's only one signal so nothing to worry about. With 16 lanes running at insane speed, a "minor" variance in propagation in any of those lanes will probably be larger than an individual bit-time.

  8. #8
    Brilliant Idiot
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Hell on Earth
    Posts
    11,015
    Quote Originally Posted by xBanzai89 View Post
    This would be fun to mess around with. Lots of reviewers thought this CPU is being held back from being locked.
    Those reviewers would find out quickly an unlocked multi gains them little to nothing.
    heatware chew*
    I've got no strings to hold me down.
    To make me fret, or make me frown.
    I had strings but now I'm free.
    There are no strings on me

  9. #9
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Sillicon Valley, California
    Posts
    1,261
    AMD: no longer the cheaper choice for more fun. They had design problem as an IDM and its even worse after they spin out Global Foundry.
    Athlon 64 3200+ | ASUS M2A-VM 0202 | Corsair XMS2 TWIN2X2048-6400 | 3ware 9650SE 4LPML | Seasonic SS-380HB | Antec Solo
    Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.0GHz | ASUS P5WDG2-WS Pro 1001 | Gigabyte 4850HD Silent | G.Skill F2-6400PHU2-2GBHZ | Samsung MCCOE64G5MPP-0VA SLC SSD | Seasonic M12 650 | Antec P180
    Core i7-2600K @ 4.3 GHz @ 1.30V | ASUS P8P67 Pro | Sparkle GTX 560 Ti | G.Skill Ripjaw X F3-12800CL8 4x4GB @ 933MHz 9-10-9-24 2T | Crucial C300 128GB | Seasonic X750 Gold | Antec P183


    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    DRAM production lines are simple and extremely cheap in a ultra low profit market.

  10. #10
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    US
    Posts
    1,379
    Quote Originally Posted by hyc View Post
    Sounds like clock skew/jitter; with a single lane there's only one signal so nothing to worry about. With 16 lanes running at insane speed, a "minor" variance in propagation in any of those lanes will probably be larger than an individual bit-time.
    I just figured it's probably furnished by the FCH and that the FCH must have its own clockgen for the lanes it provides. The other onboard devices all work fine so it makes sense. Who knows for sure though.

    --Matt
    My Rig :
    Core i5 4570S - ASUS Z87I-DELUXE - 16GB Mushkin Blackline DDR3-2400 - 256GB Plextor M5 Pro Xtreme

  11. #11
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Evje, Norway
    Posts
    3,419
    The first Phenom II's didnt clock very vell either but now they clock fairly well.
    Quote Originally Posted by iddqd View Post
    Not to be outdone by rival ATi, nVidia's going to offer its own drivers on EA Download Manager.
    X2 555 @ B55 @ 4050 1.4v, NB @ 2700 1.35v Fuzion V1
    Gigabyte 890gpa-ud3h v2.1
    HD6950 2GB swiftech MCW60 @ 1000mhz, 1.168v 1515mhz memory
    Corsair Vengeance 2x4GB 1866 cas 9 @ 1800 8.9.8.27.41 1T 110ns 1.605v
    C300 64GB, 2X Seagate barracuda green LP 2TB, Essence STX, Zalman ZM750-HP
    DDC 3.2/petras, PA120.3 ek-res400, Stackers STC-01,
    Dell U2412m, G110, G9x, Razer Scarab

  12. #12
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Bangkok,Thailand (DamHot)
    Posts
    2,693
    it would be more fun
    Intel Core i5 6600K + ASRock Z170 OC Formula + Galax HOF 4000 (8GBx2) + Antec 1200W OC Version
    EK SupremeHF + BlackIce GTX360 + Swiftech 655 + XSPC ResTop
    Macbook Pro 15" Late 2011 (i7 2760QM + HD 6770M)
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) , Huawei Nexus 6P
    [history system]80286 80386 80486 Cyrix K5 Pentium133 Pentium II Duron1G Athlon1G E2180 E3300 E5300 E7200 E8200 E8400 E8500 E8600 Q9550 QX6800 X3-720BE i7-920 i3-530 i5-750 Semp140@x2 955BE X4-B55 Q6600 i5-2500K i7-2600K X4-B60 X6-1055T FX-8120 i7-4790K

  13. #13
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    yes, Im looking forward for my first APU BE :-).
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  14. #14
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    The only reason why this model may be an actual improvement over 3850 is higher starting clock. OCing is already possible via base clock with 3850 and its multiplier is high enough for maximum stable OC on air(air cooling is what most buyers will use).

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •