Page 175 of 220 FirstFirst ... 75125165172173174175176177178185 ... LastLast
Results 4,351 to 4,375 of 5495

Thread: SSD Write Endurance 25nm Vs 34nm

  1. #4351
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    609
    Todays update:

    m4
    888.4214 TiB
    3758 hours
    Avg speed 74.48 MiB/s.
    AD gone from 107 to 102.
    P/E 15319.
    MD5 OK.
    Reallocated sectors : 00


    Intel X25-M G1 80GB
    618.88 TiB
    23070 hours
    Reallocated sectors : 156
    Available Reserved space: 90
    MWI=124
    MD5 =OK
    42.06 MiB/s on avg


    Intel X25-E 64GB
    45.09 TiB
    157-30=127 hours
    Reallocated sectors : 0
    Available Reserved space: 100
    MWI=99
    MD5 =OK
    101.49 MiB/s on avg
    1: AMD FX-8150-Sabertooth 990FX-8GB Corsair XMS3-C300 256GB-Gainward GTX 570-HX-750
    2: Phenom II X6 1100T-Asus M4A89TD Pro/usb3-8GB Corsair Dominator-Gainward GTX 460SE/-X25-V 40GB-(Crucial m4 64GB /Intel X25-M G1 80GB/X25-E 64GB/Mtron 7025/Vertex 1 donated to endurance testing)
    3: Asus U31JG - X25-M G2 160GB

  2. #4352
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    467
    Patriot Torqx-2 64GB - Day 92 - Not running

    Drive hours: 2,036
    ASU GiB written (previous run): 144,175.53 GiB (140.8 TiB)
    ASU GiB written (current run): 0.00 GiB (0 TiB)
    ASU GiB written (Total): 144,175.53 GiB (140.8 TiB)
    Avg MB/s: 0 MB/s
    MD5: OK

    Bad blocks: 20 grown, 83 factory
    Wear cycle counter: 9067 average erase cycles, 13875 maximum erase cycles.
    Total ECC Error Count: 1
    SATA PHY error count: 250

    Intel 520 60GB - Day 84

    Drive hours: 1,964
    ASU GiB written: 625,572.45 GiB (610.91 TiB)
    Avg MB/s: 95.40 MB/s
    MD5: OK

    Host GB written (F1): 630,028.75 GiB (615.26 TiB, 20160920 raw)
    NAND writes (F9): 446,021 GiB (435.57 TiB)

    Reallocated sectors (05): 0
    Failure count (AB, AC): 0 program, 0 erase
    Raw Error Rate (8B): 115 normalised
    Avaliable Reserved Space (AA): 100 normalised
    Media Wearout Indicator (E9): 1

    Vertex 4 128GB - Day 31

    Drive hours: 759 (556 + 203)
    ASU GiB written: 329,433.46 GiB (321.71 TiB)
    Avg MB/s: 125.83 MB/s
    MD5: OK

    Sector GB written (E8): 332,337.96 GiB (324.55 TiB, 486156078177 + 210807149746 raw)
    Reallocated sectors (05): 1
    Raw Read Error Rate (01): 6
    Remaining Life (E9): 48 (78 current - 30)

    Time to attempt to resurrect the Torqx 2 drive --- again!

  3. #4353
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,838
    Kingston SSDNow 40GB (X25-V)

    960.52TB Host writes
    Reallocated sectors : 05 43
    Available Reserved Space : E8 99
    POH 8611
    MD5 OK

    33.22MiB/s on avg (~98 hours)

    Endurance_cr_20120517.png

    Endurance_PEsummary_20120517.png

    The Vertex 4 is getting close to 3K which is spec for the NAND. (according to some review sites)
    Last edited by Anvil; 05-17-2012 at 08:18 AM.
    -
    Hardware:

  4. #4354
    SSDabuser
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Rocket City
    Posts
    1,434
    A few weeks back, I tried to calculate how many PE cycles the V4's firmware associated with MWI. It looked as though the MWI was based on 7K PE cycles. Canthearu's V4 only had 100TB back then, so maybe I did something wrong. But the flash is only 3K rated.

  5. #4355
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,838
    Based on MWI it looks to aim for ~5K.
    (~2700 cycles and 48% remaining)
    -
    Hardware:

  6. #4356
    SSDabuser
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Rocket City
    Posts
    1,434
    Samsung 830 256GB Day 60

    1,427,874.66GiB
    1,394.41 TiB

    282.48
    MB/s Average
    1415 Hours

    6204 Wear Leveling Count
    MWI 1

    5/0 Erase/Program Fail
    Used Reserved Block Count: 10/20480 sectors

  7. #4357
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    467
    Well, MWI is going down a lot quicker for the V4 on 1.4RC.

    Typical OCZ to cheap out on the NAND and not tell anyone.

  8. #4358
    SSDabuser
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Rocket City
    Posts
    1,434
    Quote Originally Posted by canthearu View Post
    Well, MWI is going down a lot quicker for the V4 on 1.4RC.

    Typical OCZ to cheap out on the NAND and not tell anyone.
    It does seem to be decreasing faster on 1.4RC6. In the calculations I performed, the MWi was at 88 and I assumed 115GB per PE cycle. At the time, it worked out to around 7K PE cycles that MWI was based on. They may have tweaked it for RC6.

  9. #4359
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,124
    So, if I'm reading the charts correctly, currently the highest endurance drives are Intel & Samsung?

    Also, just to clarify, Anvil, does your utility do any crc checks of the data in the read cycle (i.e. will it catch any errors if the drive mis-writes or mis-reads them back to your application?) Basically seeing if we have the data here that would also help bound bit error expectations on the drives that are being tested.

  10. #4360
    SSDabuser
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Rocket City
    Posts
    1,434
    Quote Originally Posted by stevecs View Post
    So, if I'm reading the charts correctly, currently the highest endurance drives are Intel & Samsung?
    The second chart shows estimated current PE cycle count for presently running drives (not the past drives). So far Intel, Crucial, and Samsung are doing the best, but then, 6 of the 8 are made by those three companies. And they each own fabs, so it shouldn't be that surprising.

  11. #4361
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,838
    Quote Originally Posted by stevecs View Post
    Also, just to clarify, Anvil, does your utility do any crc checks of the data in the read cycle (i.e. will it catch any errors if the drive mis-writes or mis-reads them back to your application?) Basically seeing if we have the data here that would also help bound bit error expectations on the drives that are being tested.
    There is a MD5 test which is being performed every n loops, default is every 5 loops.
    I perform the test on a ISO image, about 2GB in size.
    (the file doesn't sit on the drive, it's copied to the drive when testing is due, in case there is an error it is reported)
    -
    Hardware:

  12. #4362
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    467
    Nope, the Torqx 2 is finished. While it did secure erase and I was able to push slightly more data to it ... windows event viewer is continually reporting write errors and ASU is unresponsive. I think it also crashed my endurance rig/HTPC last night.

    My last status update is probably accurate enough for this drive. Add on 5TiB if you care.

    Torqx 2 = dead and unloved

  13. #4363
    SSDabuser
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Rocket City
    Posts
    1,434
    Like my MTRONS and Turbos and Octane, it too is an also-ran. The Phison needs some work.

  14. #4364
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,838
    The departure of the Torqx 2 was expected, not overly impressive.

    I'm debating what to use as the next drive, the SF drives have been done almost to death and so I'm looking at something else.


    There are some great offers on 128GB Petrol, Octane and m4, some of them have been done (Octane) and the m4 is currently being tested in 64GB capacity.

    Late last night I started thinking about testing 3K drives, i.e. Intel 330 or the Kingston HyperX 3K, they are both interesting drives but then we are back on the SF controller...
    (still got the Force 3 though, could do some other compression ratio testing...)
    -
    Hardware:

  15. #4365
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    609
    3K units are very interesting and the plextor m3/m3p would have been a good contestant.
    1: AMD FX-8150-Sabertooth 990FX-8GB Corsair XMS3-C300 256GB-Gainward GTX 570-HX-750
    2: Phenom II X6 1100T-Asus M4A89TD Pro/usb3-8GB Corsair Dominator-Gainward GTX 460SE/-X25-V 40GB-(Crucial m4 64GB /Intel X25-M G1 80GB/X25-E 64GB/Mtron 7025/Vertex 1 donated to endurance testing)
    3: Asus U31JG - X25-M G2 160GB

  16. #4366
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Istanbul
    Posts
    606
    Quote Originally Posted by B.A.T View Post
    3K units are very interesting and the plextor m3/m3p would have been a good contestant.
    Im looking forward to that to see what toshibas 24nm nands doing

  17. #4367
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    609
    Todays update:

    m4
    895.2967 TiB
    3785 hours
    Avg speed 74.44 MiB/s.
    AD gone from 102 to 98.
    P/E 15435.
    MD5 OK.
    Reallocated sectors : 00


    Intel X25-M G1 80GB
    622.76 TiB
    23097 hours
    Reallocated sectors : 156 to 157
    Available Reserved space: 90
    MWI=124
    MD5 =OK
    42.03 MiB/s on avg


    Intel X25-E 64GB
    54.54 TiB
    184-30=154 hours
    Reallocated sectors : 0
    Available Reserved space: 100
    MWI=99
    MD5 =OK
    101.46 MiB/s on avg
    1: AMD FX-8150-Sabertooth 990FX-8GB Corsair XMS3-C300 256GB-Gainward GTX 570-HX-750
    2: Phenom II X6 1100T-Asus M4A89TD Pro/usb3-8GB Corsair Dominator-Gainward GTX 460SE/-X25-V 40GB-(Crucial m4 64GB /Intel X25-M G1 80GB/X25-E 64GB/Mtron 7025/Vertex 1 donated to endurance testing)
    3: Asus U31JG - X25-M G2 160GB

  18. #4368
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    467
    Still deciding if I should throw a sandisk extreme 120gig into the mix .... they are quite inexpensive, and would be interesting to test the 24nm NAND.

  19. #4369
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,838
    That is an interesting drive!
    I was considering that one but the shop that sells them extremely cheap doesn't sell to businesses. (I won't get a tax refund)

    Looks like the Intel 330 could be it!
    Plextors are still too expensive here, the M3P (~$260) is more or less 2x the price of a SanDisk Extreme and about $50 more than most other drives like the Intel 520 (~$210), almost $100 more than an m4 ($165).
    -
    Hardware:

  20. #4370
    SSDabuser
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Rocket City
    Posts
    1,434
    I happen to not be using my 128GB M3P at the moment... It has host writes and MWI now...

    Actually, I'm not using most of my drives. But I really want to test the M3P!

    They're $210 here at the moment, but the 128GB 830 is only $109 this weekend, so if I were making a buying decision, I'd take the 830. Since I already own the M3P, the choice is clear.

    Can anyone think of a good reason not to test it?
    Last edited by Christopher; 05-18-2012 at 05:08 AM.

  21. #4371
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,838
    I won't be entering a M3P so feel free

    Agility 4s are starting to surface, wonder whats up with that vs Vertex 4?

    Not much info on the Agility 4, this is all I have found on the 128GB (Agility 4 Max R/W 400 MB/ 300 MB sec)
    -
    Hardware:

  22. #4372
    SSDabuser
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Rocket City
    Posts
    1,434
    Samsung 830 256GB Day 61

    1,452,304.28GiB
    1,418.26 TiB

    297.51
    MB/s Average
    1438 Hours

    6311 Wear Leveling Count
    MWI 1

    5/0 Erase/Program Fail
    Used Reserved Block Count: 10/20480 sectors

  23. #4373
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    467
    Intel 520 60GB - Day 86

    Drive hours: 2,011
    ASU GiB written: 637,689.27 GiB (622.74 TiB)
    Avg MB/s: 95.42 MB/s
    MD5: OK

    Host GB written (F1): 642,255.88 GiB (627.20 TiB, 20552188 raw)
    NAND writes (F9): 454,676 GiB (444.02 TiB)

    Reallocated sectors (05): 0
    Failure count (AB, AC): 0 program, 0 erase
    Raw Error Rate (8B): 108 normalised
    Avaliable Reserved Space (AA): 100 normalised
    Media Wearout Indicator (E9): 1

    Vertex 4 128GB - Day 33

    Drive hours: 801 (556 + 245)
    ASU GiB written: 345,315.27 GiB (337.22 TiB)
    Avg MB/s: 123.96 MB/s
    MD5: OK

    Sector GB written (E8): 348,370.44 GiB (340.21 TiB, 486156078177 + 244429690650 raw)
    Reallocated sectors (05): 4
    Raw Read Error Rate (01): 6
    Remaining Life (E9): 44 (74 current - 30)

    Hmm, 3 more bad blocks in the last 48h. Hopefully this vertex 4 isn't following the same path as the octane before it.

  24. #4374
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    2,838
    Might not be a good idea to flash to 1.4 as SMART values are reset.

    The next 48hours should tell if there is something going on, there shouldn't be that much in common with the Octane except for the casing.
    -
    Hardware:

  25. #4375
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    467
    Quote Originally Posted by Anvil View Post
    The next 48hours should tell if there is something going on, there shouldn't be that much in common with the Octane except for the casing.
    Except for the same people writing the firmware!

Page 175 of 220 FirstFirst ... 75125165172173174175176177178185 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •