Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 36 of 36

Thread: Sandy Bridge contest @ Futuremark

  1. #26
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    17,468
    ended prematurely?
    Team.AU
    Got tube?
    GIGABYTE Australia
    Need a GIGABYTE bios or support?



  2. #27
    Wanna look under my kilt?
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Glasgow-ish U.K.
    Posts
    4,509
    I kinda picked last night to bring it back up because it lined up with the end... 15th may?
    Quote Originally Posted by T_M View Post
    Not sure i totally follow anything you said, but regardless of that you helped me come up with a very good idea....
    Quote Originally Posted by soundood View Post
    you sigged that?

    why?
    ______

    Sometimes, it's not your time. Sometimes, you have to make it your time. Sometimes, it can ONLY be your time.

  3. #28
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Espoo.fi
    Posts
    12
    Hey guys,

    Sorry for not replying here earlier.

    The submit counter was basically based on the number of benchmark submits coming in that fulfilled either segment criteria, so the vast majority were 3DMark 11, Performance preset -submits with a Sandy Bridge CPU and a single discrete graphics card which is a very popular combination.

    The top list just filtered this to the top 8 after applying all validity criteria.

    Futuremark receives about 20k benchmark results every day, so the number of submits that match contest criteria is bound to be large as we don't require our users to jump through additional hoops to enter. Naturally most don't intend to compete for the high score, but all qualify for the lucky draw prizes for example.
    pasi (at) futuremark.com
    Site Manager
    Futuremark

  4. #29
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10,379
    Lucky draw idea is cool, i fully agree. But it totally falsifies the number of people that intentionally submitted a score for the competition... This should not have been exposed like this... it's totally wrong...
    Question : Why do some overclockers switch into d*ckmode when money is involved

    Remark : They call me Pro Asus Saaya yupp, I agree

  5. #30
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Espoo.fi
    Posts
    12
    It's true that given the large number of submits we receive all the time the number is not indicative of users who were running benchmarks just for entering the contest, but I don't want to have users jump through unnecessary hoops to enter contests given that we have a validation process already in place for everyone sending us their scores.

    Also for anyone on the leaderboard it's still a number of real benchmark submissions during the contest period that were slower, so it's still something.
    pasi (at) futuremark.com
    Site Manager
    Futuremark

  6. #31
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    17,468
    Quote Originally Posted by Leeghoofd View Post
    Lucky draw idea is cool, i fully agree. But it totally falsifies the number of people that intentionally submitted a score for the competition... This should not have been exposed like this... it's totally wrong...
    here we go again

    http://www.asrock.com/news/index.asp?cat=News&ID=329

    The competition which ran from January 16 to February 12, 2012 attracted approximately 100,000 entries worldwide that made the competition was extremely intense. With 22 entries scoring exceeding P10,000 on 3DMark11 test from the competition and myriads of positive reviews from the global media, ASRock X79 and Z68 series is widely regarded as motherboards of high reliability and excellent performance.
    Team.AU
    Got tube?
    GIGABYTE Australia
    Need a GIGABYTE bios or support?



  7. #32
    Wanna look under my kilt?
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Glasgow-ish U.K.
    Posts
    4,509
    Hey Dinos I was speaking to someone about this very thing earlier.

    After some very quick maths, we figured out there might have been 77 valid and relevant SB-E results. Yes..... 77.


    Do ASRock even HAVE 100,000 users? (entrants had to use ASR board)
    Quote Originally Posted by T_M View Post
    Not sure i totally follow anything you said, but regardless of that you helped me come up with a very good idea....
    Quote Originally Posted by soundood View Post
    you sigged that?

    why?
    ______

    Sometimes, it's not your time. Sometimes, you have to make it your time. Sometimes, it can ONLY be your time.

  8. #33
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    251
    Quote Originally Posted by dinos22 View Post
    Yeah a competition no 79xx user can enter thanks to no official futuremark approved driver. Nice.....

    Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
    4960X@4.7 | Asus RIVF | 16Gb@2400 | 256Gb 840 Pro | R9 290 | AX-860W | 540Air | Custom W/C

  9. #34
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    17,468
    seriously FM this is a joke, why are you feeding manufacturers such stupid figures, common!!!
    Team.AU
    Got tube?
    GIGABYTE Australia
    Need a GIGABYTE bios or support?



  10. #35
    Champion
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    237
    Yeah a competition no 79xx user can enter thanks to no official futuremark approved driver. Nice.....
    That's actually AMD's fault. Catalyst 12.1 did not support 7970 for some reason.
    GOOC 2009 EU: #3
    MSI MOA 2009 EU: #3
    MSI MOA 2009 WW: #1
    MSI MOA 2010 EU: #1
    MSI MOA 2010 WW: #1
    MSI MOA 2011 EU: #4

    ** and some screw-ups i don't wanna mention

  11. #36
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,584
    i think asrock is going in the right direction though. go go nickshih


Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •