Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 49 of 49

Thread: EVGA P67 and 3Dmark2001 benchmark

  1. #26
    ¿
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    4,772
    Oh yeah!!

  2. #27
    take me to the manbar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    South Africa :)
    Posts
    1,179
    beastlike run!

    So it seems the gigabyte still score a bit higher than the evga's?

    I want to see moaaaaaar! and pics!

  3. #28
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    221
    Congrat mate!!! This chip it´s a shame :P

  4. #29
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Russia,Voronezh
    Posts
    106
    damn....


    S370 WR:



  5. #30
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    İstanbul-TURKIYE
    Posts
    144
    Great job Vince and Tin. congrats..
    HWA OC TEAM TÜRKİYE



    Sorry my bad English

  6. #31
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    59
    Sick score guys! Wonder how much room is left...(136K possible?)

    Keep pushing!

    Cant wait for EVGA to arrive

  7. #32
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Oslo, Norway
    Posts
    1,218
    hoho! here we go

  8. #33
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Philly
    Posts
    198
    Quote Originally Posted by Vivi View Post
    beastlike run!

    So it seems the gigabyte still score a bit higher than the evga's?

    I want to see moaaaaaar! and pics!

    giga who?

    Great job Vince
    Mobo: eVGA x58 Classified (759)
    CPU: i7-990x
    GPU: 2xGTX 580
    Cooling: F1 Gemini/Tek-9 Fat LN2 | 12k BTU Chiller HK 3.0/DD Water Block
    RAM: 3 x 2gb DDR3 Crucial Ballistix Tracers
    HD: OCZ LE SSD 100GB | OCZ Vertex 2 SSD 60GB
    PSU: PC Power & Cooling 1200W
    OS: Win7 64-Bit | XP Pro
    Monitor: Dell 2707 LCD

  9. #34
    Xtreme XIP
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    1,559

    Thumbs up

    Hell Yeah the king its back , amazing run Vincy that eVGA Board its smoking fast bro , me wants

  10. #35
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    55
    well done guys.

    You used gtx275 lightning this time, so gtx285 classified at your outstanding clocks is not the better choise?

  11. #36
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    Posts
    2,219
    Wow what a chip :O
    MB Reviewer for HWC
    Team OCX Bench Team

  12. #37
    Quote Originally Posted by SuicidePhoenix View Post
    well done guys.

    You used gtx275 lightning this time, so gtx285 classified at your outstanding clocks is not the better choise?
    It would be the better choice if it were still working properly . I guess grinding 1.6v through it at those clocks and full pot on the TEK was too much for it. Other tests were impacted negatively by switching to the LG tho. GTX285 at really high clocks is the way.

  13. #38
    Admin
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    5,225
    Quote Originally Posted by k|ngp|n View Post
    It would be the better choice if it were still working properly . I guess grinding 1.6v through it at those clocks and full pot on the TEK was too much for it. Other tests were impacted negatively by switching to the LG tho. GTX285 at really high clocks is the way.
    And what about the 280?

  14. #39
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    120
    waiting for the lightning SLI + Sandy to break the overall WR

  15. #40
    Diablo 3! Who's Excited?
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Boulder, Colorado
    Posts
    9,412
    Board is looking good Nice run also

  16. #41
    Quote Originally Posted by Gautam View Post
    And what about the 280?

  17. #42
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    423
    what's the problem with new cards at 01?
    why 580,6970 etc.. performs bad ?

  18. #43
    take me to the manbar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    South Africa :)
    Posts
    1,179
    Quote Originally Posted by KanGaXx View Post
    what's the problem with new cards at 01?
    why 580,6970 etc.. performs bad ?
    drivers

    if gtx 580 worked with 182.50 driver we would see a whole new kind of wr .

  19. #44
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Shangri-La
    Posts
    270
    Nice benching guys

    waiting for dual card damage......

  20. #45
    Xtreme XIP
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    1,559

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by Afrokalle View Post
    waiting for dual card damage......
    +1

  21. #46
    Hardware Nightmare
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Taipei :)
    Posts
    854
    Taking GND reference from another galaxy

    Electronics engineering @ extreme overclocker
    LN2: Cel347@8199.5MHz,920@5300,E8600@6610,QX9650@5700,X 3050@4311,X3470@5060

  22. #47
    Xtreme XIP
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    1,559

    Thumbs up

    The King its ready for Battle

    Congrats Vince awsome run
    ( I wonder how high its that back up 136k )

    Last edited by chispy; 05-17-2011 at 08:11 PM.

  23. #48
    Xtreme XIP
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    1,559

    Talking

    Congratz Vincy #1 again in single 01 VGA , 136401 its your lowest back up , please save a 138k run for last back up
    Well done bro , The PURE way...



    http://hwbot.org/submission/2176108_...5_136401_marks

  24. #49
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    246
    Incredible guys
    http://www.xtremehardware.com/

    The Best Scene of Hardware In Italy

    Follow Us And Add Me http://www.facebook.com/?ref=tn_tnmn...00003658778509

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •