Bulldozers first screens

[JPQY]

heh, I cant say it. But, its not bad, thats all.

It should be better for Chess

And very close too a 980x ..hoppely it can pass it with his 2cores more!

JP.

[undone]

http://diybbs.zol.com.cn/10/11_99255.html

googlish:
http://translate.google.com/translat...F11_99255.html

[undone]

double post.

[AKM]

[muziqaz]

1.9v nearly 2v do I see Athlon XP again?

[zalbard]

You see a fake since CPU-Z does not support BD yet.

[muziqaz]

You see a fake since CPU-Z does not support BD yet.

I treat every CPU Z about BD as fake anyway, but that does not stop the discussion

[Tomasis]

fake? or it was Chew who is benching it with Dice?

[undone]

Comparing to the screenshot that made by CPU-Z's author himself
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=887

[DarthShader]

TDP 186W? Yeah, right.

[[XC] Oj101]

Agreed. TDP is stock TDP, it doesn't scale with speed and voltage. I think it's clear that BD will clock higher than Thuban, 6GHz suicide at almost 2v is a joke.

[Sw1tchfoot]

Who's to say Bulldozer really is "Delayed"

They confirmed that their roadmap did not change. Which (if they haven't changed their minds) means it will be announced/launched at the "E3 2011 Show in June" but won't ship until later.

I'm suprised that people are getting to enraged that it wasn't launched at Computex, when there was no true indication of it in the first place.

[jimbo75]

Who's to say Bulldozer really is "Delayed"

They confirmed that their roadmap did not change. Which (if they haven't changed their minds) means it will be announced/launched at the "E3 2011 Show in June" but won't ship until later.

I'm suprised that people are getting to enraged that it wasn't launched at Computex, when there was no true indication of it in the first place.

This is intarweb forumz, logic is a false god, heathen!

[XRL8]

Everyone can say its been delayed, im not saying because lack of computex launch.But because AMD said Q2 2011, and now AMD says Q3 2011.Thats a delay.

[LowRun]

who's to say bulldozer really is "delayed"

amd

[undone]

I don't know if this was posted before. This maybe a B1 stepping engineering sample.

[bingo13]

A good fake would have accounted for the multiplier lock on B0, hint it is below 27x...

[FlanK3r]

...but from my side I think, its fake too (reworking from this original http://tof.canardpc.com/view/3e0723d...76aed91606.jpg )

[sniper_sung]

Some screenshots for an ES sample (which seems to be buggy):

http://www.chiphell.com/thread-210024-1-1.html

Another ES is going to be reviewed soon.

[muziqaz]

With that chess benchmark my 4ghz phenom x6 scores 29points.
And I believe BD is allergic to Super Pi. Why are we still having so many people who are running that thing on every BD ES chip?

Edit: and my stock 3.2ghz 955BE score 4525 marks in 3dmark 06(cpu score)

[sniper_sung]

Live review of the other ES:

http://www.chiphell.com/thread-210890-1-1.html

[undone]

Live review of the other ES:

http://www.chiphell.com/thread-210890-1-1.html

It's still a B0 stepping engineering chip. Look at the bios screen.

ZD28251W8K44

[XRL8]

This live review of other sample better be B1 cos with B0 it seems its pointless.
I dont know if this code "ZD28251W8K44 " mean B0, but if yes, than it seems there is one cpu floating around everywhere

[Oese]

1 core chess looks much better then 8 core. Its more like 4 cores then 8...

3dm06 too, looks more like 4 cores. Maybe the µCode is not optimized to make use of the shared resources in a decent manner on that B0 stepping..

[informal]

It's pointless guys. Those are real chips but they are just ES.